Predator Question
#2
Re: Predator Question
The old release is better than the new release. I believe Fox controls this title everywhere in the world, so other regions are not going to offer different transfers.
#3
Banned
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: Predator Question
Question: What the hell is your issue w/ asking the same question for a growing number of films you're asking about?
Lethal Weapon
Predator
Terminator
What next? Terminator 2? Hard Boiled?
Lethal Weapon
Predator
Terminator
What next? Terminator 2? Hard Boiled?
#4
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Predator Question
What the hell is your issue with people looking to get questions answered on an internet forum? Seems like you think you own this forum, and only material that you think should be posted is allowed to be posted. Here's a tip for you. It wastes mroe of your time posting an asshole comment than it does to ignore a post. Hell, maybe think about posting a helpful post in the future. That way, you can actually contribute to this forum that you think you own.
#5
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#6
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Predator Question
What the hell is your issue with people looking to get questions answered on an internet forum? Seems like you think you own this forum, and only material that you think should be posted is allowed to be posted. Here's a tip for you. It wastes mroe of your time posting an asshole comment than it does to ignore a post. Hell, maybe think about posting a helpful post in the future. That way, you can actually contribute to this forum that you think you own.
#7
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Predator Question
Here's a mod note from a previous thread from the OP (bold and underlined by me):
Mod Note: You clearly haven't posted here much, even though you've been a member since 2004. We do want people to be descriptive in their thread titles, so other members know what the thread is about when they click on it. In addition, DVD Talk is not a replacement for Google, Bing, or any other search engine. If you have a question that can be quickly answered, such as when a certain title is being released on Blu-ray, it would behoove you to do a quick search online before posting the question here, especially if you're going to ask multiple times about different titles.
DVD Talk is a community, and we want people to be able to contribute. Posting multiple threads with vague titles asking for answers that could easily be answered by a quick online search is not productive. Thanks for your understanding.
I'm not trying to be an ass about this, but clearly from the OP previous conduct (looking at the number and type of threads he's started) and the fact moderators have asked him nicely in the past to cease this kind of conduct, the other member was not out of line (maybe could have been more polite) in asking the member to rethink the type of redundant thread topics/information that is readily available in existing threads or else where using google.
Mod Note: You clearly haven't posted here much, even though you've been a member since 2004. We do want people to be descriptive in their thread titles, so other members know what the thread is about when they click on it. In addition, DVD Talk is not a replacement for Google, Bing, or any other search engine. If you have a question that can be quickly answered, such as when a certain title is being released on Blu-ray, it would behoove you to do a quick search online before posting the question here, especially if you're going to ask multiple times about different titles.
DVD Talk is a community, and we want people to be able to contribute. Posting multiple threads with vague titles asking for answers that could easily be answered by a quick online search is not productive. Thanks for your understanding.
I'm not trying to be an ass about this, but clearly from the OP previous conduct (looking at the number and type of threads he's started) and the fact moderators have asked him nicely in the past to cease this kind of conduct, the other member was not out of line (maybe could have been more polite) in asking the member to rethink the type of redundant thread topics/information that is readily available in existing threads or else where using google.




