![]() |
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 10766778)
I would view the digital painting out of Natalie Portman's nipples (which were plainly visible through her white jumpsuit in the theatrical release) as damaging to the film, personally. :)
Still can't believe I didn't grab the maquette with her cameltoe showing when it was available... |
re: Star Wars
I didn't know about any of these things. Can some pics be posted of what we're talking about?
|
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 10766778)
I would view the digital painting out of Natalie Portman's nipples (which were plainly visible through her white jumpsuit in the theatrical release) as damaging to the film, personally. :)
|
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by milo bloom
(Post 10766988)
Still can't believe I didn't grab the maquette with her cameltoe showing when it was available...
|
re: Star Wars
No it was one of those really detailed little statues. About 6-8 inches tall and a very visible cameltoe.
|
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 10766778)
I would view the digital painting out of Natalie Portman's nipples (which were plainly visible through her white jumpsuit in the theatrical release) as damaging to the film, personally. :)
I remember seeing the movie in the theater and thinking it strange she was sporting Hoth nipples in a desert environment. On the DVD, the effect isn't as prominent. Didn't know if it was just because I was watching it on a sixty-foot screen, if they were removed for the home video release, or if my mind exaggerated the whole thing (ala the Sloane undressing scene in "Ferris Bueller's Day Off.") I think we need some "before and after" pictures to compare. |
re: Star Wars
I just need the "before" pictures.
|
re: Star Wars
2011 is the year of blurays!
|
re: Star Wars
I remember thinking the first time I saw AotC on digital projection opening night how much her nipples were visible. I just grabbed this pic off Google images:
Spoiler:
Might be an "after" shot |
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 10766778)
I would view the digital painting out of Natalie Portman's nipples (which were plainly visible through her white jumpsuit in the theatrical release) as damaging to the film, personally. :)
|
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Todd B.
(Post 10767446)
I just need the "before" pictures.
|
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 10767335)
Did they really remove them?
I remember seeing the movie in the theater and thinking it strange she was sporting Hoth nipples in a desert environment. On the DVD, the effect isn't as prominent. Didn't know if it was just because I was watching it on a sixty-foot screen, if they were removed for the home video release, or if my mind exaggerated the whole thing (ala the Sloane undressing scene in "Ferris Bueller's Day Off.") |
re: Star Wars
I haven't bothered to look but did they fix the nip slip in Jabba's palace in Return of the Jedi for the last couple of DVD releases?
|
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by mcnabb
(Post 10766134)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Totally agree with this. If Lucas just changes some subtle effects shots (Battle of Yavin comes to mind) or (changing Obiwans Home), fans like me wouldn't have been up in arms about the changes. Sure there would be a fanbase that would demand the originals, but it would be much smaller. The change that tipped me over the edge was removing Shaw from the Ghost Scene and adding Hayden. That killed any argument for Saga fans to say, "Well, if you don't like the PT, you don't have to watch em!!" Well, now I have to see Hayden Christenson in ROTJ everytime I watch it you stupid idiots! Hayden showing up at the end at least solidified an idea in Lucas's mind that Force ghosts are supposed to look the way they did when last "filled" (for lack of a better term) with the light side of the Force. Yes I know there's just as much a counter point that if Anakin went back to the light right when he killed the Emperor shouldn't he have stayed in Shaw form but one can choose to state he wasn't living enough to fully encapsulate or something like that. |
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by GoldenJCJ
(Post 10768030)
I haven't bothered to look but did they fix the nip slip in Jabba's palace in Return of the Jedi for the last couple of DVD releases?
(Fun fact, she was brought back to film additional scenes for the SE's in 97 and was in such good shape that she looks barely changed from 1983). |
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 10766778)
I would view the digital painting out of Natalie Portman's nipples (which were plainly visible through her white jumpsuit in the theatrical release) as damaging to the film, personally. :)
|
re: Star Wars
Yeah. I for one don't notice any difference between what I saw at the theater and what I see at home on DVD. Portman's nips look like they could poke a wookie's eye out in all versions I've ever seen. I think you folks need to calibrate your TV's.
|
re: Star Wars
1. The breast pop is still in Return of the Jedi. It's still in the '04 DVDs, so it survived two special editions.
2. Regarding AOTC, Nat's nips can still sort of be seen in the DVD version, so I don't think Lucasfilm scrubbed every trace of them, but I do recall at least one scene in the theatrical version where they're really prominent and pokey. Looked like she was smuggling a couple of marbles under that tight white top. And that isn't on the DVD. 3. I don't think Nat requested the removal, since the real things can be seen in a few of brief shots of "Closer." (Yeah, I know she was supposed to be more naked in Closer, and that nude scenes were allegedly filmed, but the nip slips in "Closer" survived to DVD and HD.) |
re: Star Wars
I'd just like to say that I'm infinitely more interested in this thread now that it's found its new topic, "Natalie Portman's nipples". Let's all stay in the here and now and forget about this Star Wars BD release that looks to be pretty crappy, anyway. :)
|
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 10768606)
I don't think Nat requested the removal, since the real things can be seen in a few of brief shots of "Closer." (Yeah, I know she was supposed to be more naked in Closer, and that nude scenes were allegedly filmed, but the nip slips in "Closer" survived to DVD and HD.)
|
re: Star Wars
At least the useless chatter has now become interesting :)
|
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by TomOpus
(Post 10768846)
At least the useless chatter has now become interesting :)
-The Death Star -Darth Vader -The Force -'I am a your father!" -Millenium Falcon -Slave Leia The Prequel Trilogy Legacy: -Jar Jar Binks -Natalie's nipples in AOTC |
re: Star Wars
GL's birthday is May 14. He turns 67. Will only nice things be said about him for that day?
TFN says it's confirmed that audio is DTS-HD MA and covers are non-lenticular. http://www.theforce.net/latestnews/s...its_138126.asp |
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by mcnabb
(Post 10768854)
The Classic Trilogy Legacy:
-The Death Star -Darth Vader -The Force -'I am a your father!" -Millenium Falcon -Slave Leia The Prequel Trilogy Legacy: -Jar Jar Binks -Natalie's nipples in AOTC |
re: Star Wars
I think we've forgotten that entire trilogy already. :rimshot:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.