Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

Star Wars

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-18-14 | 07:16 AM
  #3601  
Shannon Nutt's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,585
Received 412 Likes on 310 Posts
From: Pittsburgh, PA
re: Star Wars

All this talk about Disney seems to miss the point that there's nothing stopping FOX from releasing the original trilogy on Blu-ray - except perhaps access to original prints (which I assume they'd need permission from LucasFilm to use).

Seriously, I don't know what good it does FOX to own the distribution rights until 2020 (and the original film forever), if they never plan to do anything with them...obviously some sort of co-deal with Disney is in everyone's interest.
Old 08-18-14 | 09:32 AM
  #3602  
Giles's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 33,645
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Washington DC
re: Star Wars

And too bad the 3D conversions never panned out. I was kind of interested in seeing them as such
Old 08-18-14 | 09:55 AM
  #3603  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
All this talk about Disney seems to miss the point that there's nothing stopping FOX from releasing the original trilogy on Blu-ray - except perhaps access to original prints (which I assume they'd need permission from LucasFilm to use).

Seriously, I don't know what good it does FOX to own the distribution rights until 2020 (and the original film forever), if they never plan to do anything with them...obviously some sort of co-deal with Disney is in everyone's interest.
The LucasFilm hurdle is a pretty big obstacle. LucasFilm can't just demand that Fox release something they don't want to release and of course Fox has to run what they release through LucasFilm.

You could almost see it playing out in a courtroom because these agreements don't exist to allow one company to block things that would provide revenue to the other. If Disney refused to approve anything Fox wanted to do with the series beyond all reason Fox would likely have some grounds to sue them. Disney could also similarly sue Fox for sitting on the films for the next 16 years if they took the films OOP and refused to release them altogether.

These agreements are made in good faith and these scenarios would likely never happen though. Neither company would benefit by sabotaging the other's claim to the movies.

The reality of this is that Star Wars is Star Wars to the vast majority of people in the real world and Fox was happy to release the films the way Lucas wanted on DVD and Blu, and now if Disney sees it differently we're likely to get different versions.

If this does happen I predict a huge explosion of online hype and a sobering wake-up call when the sales are strong but unremarkable and ultimately less than the previous modified versions. You guys can all quote me on that.
Old 08-18-14 | 10:06 AM
  #3604  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Guru Askew

If this does happen I predict a huge explosion of online hype and a sobering wake-up call when the sales are strong but unremarkable and ultimately less than the previous modified versions. You guys can all quote me on that.
IF they get released in 2015, that would be 4 years after the previous releases, which came at the bubble before disc sales plummeted. Sales will be there, but it won't be as big as people think, and even getting retailers to stock them might be a challenge (remember, there are several SKUs out already for these films). Retailers have been reducing disc space, not expanding. And from what they currently have, it's bargain bin stuff and cheap prices. These will likely command a high price and be a difficult sale.

So yes, I agree with you.

But...If they do come out in 2015 when the new film arrives in Theaters, these would likely receive a boost in sales regardless if they are the modified or "original" versions.
Old 08-18-14 | 10:08 AM
  #3605  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 7,436
Received 92 Likes on 72 Posts
From: Philadelphia, PA
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Guru Askew

If this does happen I predict a huge explosion of online hype and a sobering wake-up call when the sales are strong but unremarkable and ultimately less than the previous modified versions. You guys can all quote me on that.
You could be exactly right, but so what? There is a demand for these versions, just like there was a demand for Superman 2:The Donnor Cut, so it shouldn't matter how many people buy them in the end. I don't know how many people ended up buying Superman 2:The Donnor Cut (I have some friends that did and some friends that didn't), but they still put it out fully remastered on DVD and BluRay, but does anyone on the Superman Message Boards question how many were actually sold?
Old 08-18-14 | 10:22 AM
  #3606  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,807
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
From: Parts Unknown
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Gizmo
But...If they do come out in 2015 when the new film arrives in Theaters, these would likely receive a boost in sales regardless if they are the modified or "original" versions.
I disagree. There would be a boost in sales regardless which version is released but not on the same level if the original (and so far unreleased) versions make their HD debuts. There would be a slew of new people, like myself, who would buy these that haven't purchased the 2 previous blu ray sets because they are the modified versions.
Old 08-18-14 | 10:23 AM
  #3607  
hdnmickey's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 12,524
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Cygnus
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by mcnabb
You could be exactly right, but so what? There is a demand for these versions, just like there was a demand for Superman 2:The Donnor Cut, so it shouldn't matter how many people buy them in the end. I don't know how many people ended up buying Superman 2:The Donnor Cut (I have some friends that did and some friends that didn't), but they still put it out fully remastered on DVD and BluRay, but does anyone on the Superman Message Boards question how many were actually sold?
It also can't help but to be affected by the prior releases. No going back in time and seeing exactly how many moe or less the true OT would have sold on BD if given a solo chance.
Old 08-18-14 | 10:50 AM
  #3608  
rocket1312's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,137
Likes: 0
Received 1,805 Likes on 1,229 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Guru Askew
If this does happen I predict a huge explosion of online hype and a sobering wake-up call when the sales are strong but unremarkable and ultimately less than the previous modified versions. You guys can all quote me on that.
Sobering to who? To Disney or Fox? Not sobering to me. I wouldn't care if they only sold one copy as long as that one copy went to me. I don't need any sort of public validation of the original trilogy. I just want to watch the movies.

And for those who are interested in these types of things, Harmy's Empire v2.0 has been released and it's pretty great.
Old 08-18-14 | 10:58 AM
  #3609  
madcougar's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,691
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Houston
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Gizmo
Thank god. Now all couple thousand hold outs can buy it and STFU.
And a few thousand more who already own multiple sets can rebuy them one more time!

Old 08-18-14 | 11:44 AM
  #3610  
Spiderbite's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 20,514
Received 2,851 Likes on 1,763 Posts
From: Jesusland, AL
re: Star Wars

They really could market the OOT in such a way that it could be the biggest BD release ever. Bring out the OOT completely cleaned up but with no added scenes or CG crap and state that it is the only way to see it, period. It won't be sold to TV, cable, shown in theaters, etc. and only released on BD (though I personally would love to see the OOT in a theater again).

With the right push, I have no doubt it would likely outsell anything else that has been released on BD. I am one of the holdouts and if they release this, it would make my day. I haven't watched the films in years and sold my crappy non-anamorphic release awhile back for some decent change. And as someone else said above, I don't give two shits about extras. Just give me the original films, cleaned up with a nice sound mix and call it a day.

I keep meaning to download the Harmy stuff but never get around to it. I have the first two film versions that he did but I believe he has updated them several times since.
Old 08-18-14 | 12:19 PM
  #3611  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by rocket1312
Sobering to who? To Disney or Fox? Not sobering to me. I wouldn't care if they only sold one copy as long as that one copy went to me. I don't need any sort of public validation of the original trilogy. I just want to watch the movies.
Agreed.
Old 08-18-14 | 12:29 PM
  #3612  
Hokeyboy's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,847
Received 1,034 Likes on 619 Posts
From: Fort Lauderdale, FL
re: Star Wars

So many people are entirely enmeshed with having their opinions/convictions/entire lifestyles validated by the masses, they're almost certain to project those sentiments onto others... especially those that disagree with them
Old 08-18-14 | 12:37 PM
  #3613  
rocket1312's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,137
Likes: 0
Received 1,805 Likes on 1,229 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Spiderbite
With the right push, I have no doubt it would likely outsell anything else that has been released on BD.
I like your enthusiasm, but that's not going to happen. According to this chart, the only catalog releases in the top 50 all-time best selling blu-rays are the first Star Wars boxset (I-VI) and a handful of animated Disney titles. Avatar is no.1 with 7+ million copies. Star Wars is no.45 at 1.7 million. Disney/Fox would probably be lucky to match those numbers.
Old 08-18-14 | 12:53 PM
  #3614  
milo bloom's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 18,942
Received 1,637 Likes on 1,190 Posts
From: Chicago suburbs
re: Star Wars

The idea that they wouldn't bother with another Bluray release because the market isn't what it used to be is just absurd. All you have to do is look at all the obscure horror films that get release after release, or how Criterion can release the films they do (with a price markup, of course), and then something like BladeRunner. Sure, it's got its fans, I'm one of them, but compared to Star Wars fans? If they can do a multi-version release for BladeRunner, they sure as hell can make the numbers work for Star Wars).

(And no offense to the people that like obscure horror and such, it was just an example).
Old 08-18-14 | 01:00 PM
  #3615  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by rocket1312
Sobering to who? To Disney or Fox? Not sobering to me. I wouldn't care if they only sold one copy as long as that one copy went to me. I don't need any sort of public validation of the original trilogy. I just want to watch the movies.

And for those who are interested in these types of things, Harmy's Empire v2.0 has been released and it's pretty great.
Sobering to the nerds who think the world hates George Lucas's prequel trilogy and altered OT. Sobering to the nerds who incorrectly feel their online petitions represent the real world. Sobering to the people who think Disney is on the verge of writing three enormously-successful films off as non-canon even after they've firmly established that the PT is canon even after the mass EU de-canonization.

I love all these releases like T2, Close Encounters, Blade Runner etc. that prevent multiple versions of films. My ideal Star Wars release would have every single little variation available and would let the viewer watch whatever version they watched or loved. Even down to all the little soundtrack quirks where different lines were used. If they let you choose between something as insignificant as the theatrical cut of RotS with the wipe or the DVD cut with the straight cut, I'd be thrilled. I'll happily add archival theatrical versions of any Star Wars film to my collection.

That said, I like the overwhelming majority of the changes Lucas made. The Greedo thing is the only thing that should go back to its earliest form. Some of the stuff needs to be further tweaked like the lightsaber consistency. Some of the stuff like Jedi Rocks and R2 behind the rocks in the first film stem from valid flaws that Lucas was right to address but addressed poorly.

But I like most of it. I like seeing Naboo and Coruscant celebrating the fall of the Empire. I feel more of a connection to a face I recognize from two films as a force ghost than a guy who isn't even recognizable compared to his heavily-made-up appearance moments before. I like having Ian McDiarmid consistently playing Palpatine in all 5 of his appearances.

The PT trilogy isn't going anywhere and I not only suspect that the latest Blu-ray editions will be the canon presentations of the films as they relate to the other two series, I also suspect that the majority of people viewing the original trilogy in the context of the other two trilogies will come to expect those changes, especially with the kids who have grown up loving the PT and Clone Wars.
Old 08-18-14 | 02:47 PM
  #3616  
rocket1312's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,137
Likes: 0
Received 1,805 Likes on 1,229 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Guru Askew
Sobering to the nerds who think the world hates George Lucas's prequel trilogy and altered OT. Sobering to the nerds who incorrectly feel their online petitions represent the real world. Sobering to the people who think Disney is on the verge of writing three enormously-successful films off as non-canon even after they've firmly established that the PT is canon even after the mass EU de-canonization.
I guess, but what difference does it make? It may shift the balance in some endless, mind-numbing argument over at theforce.net, but otherwise everyone would have gotten what they wanted in the end.
Old 08-18-14 | 03:07 PM
  #3617  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
re: Star Wars

So because Guru Askew likes the changes, no one should ask for the unaltered OT?
Old 08-18-14 | 03:16 PM
  #3618  
stvn1974's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 9,452
Received 1,379 Likes on 763 Posts
From: Oklahoma
re: Star Wars

Any person who likes Jedi Rocks should not only not be taken seriously but shouldn't even be allowed to voice their opinions in the first place. On anything whatsoever.
Old 08-18-14 | 06:01 PM
  #3619  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,974
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Illadelphia, PA
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by stvn1974
Any person who likes Jedi Rocks should not only not be taken seriously but shouldn't even be allowed to voice their opinions in the first place. On anything whatsoever.
This sequence was a colossal mistake and, along with Vader's ridiculous "No"s at the end, make the movie unwatchable at this point.
Old 08-18-14 | 06:46 PM
  #3620  
Cool New Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: New York City
re: Star Wars

jedi rocks was like watching a live forced abortion suddenly happen in the middle of a film
Old 08-18-14 | 06:50 PM
  #3621  
hdnmickey's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 12,524
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Cygnus
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Guru Askew
That said, I like the overwhelming majority of the changes Lucas made. The Greedo thing is the only thing that should go back to its earliest form. Some of the stuff needs to be further tweaked like the lightsaber consistency. Some of the stuff like Jedi Rocks and R2 behind the rocks in the first film stem from valid flaws that Lucas was right to address but addressed poorly.
Even the CGI extras thrown here and there for what appears to be no valid reason. And there is the Jabba scene which should have never been put back. No level of next gen CGI will ever make it work because it simply doesn't fit as a scene.
Old 08-18-14 | 06:58 PM
  #3622  
Shannon Nutt's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,585
Received 412 Likes on 310 Posts
From: Pittsburgh, PA
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by hdnmickey
Even the CGI extras thrown here and there for what appears to be no valid reason. And there is the Jabba scene which should have never been put back. No level of next gen CGI will ever make it work because it simply doesn't fit as a scene.
Right...because it simply repeats information found elsewhere in the movie. No decent director would leave that in his film.
Old 08-18-14 | 10:19 PM
  #3623  
hanshotfirst1138's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,678
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
From: Livonia MI
One of the things which works about Jabba is that especially in the first movie, he's a scary character who's spoken of in whispers even by badass smugglers. Therefore, not knowing is what makes him frightening. Lucas hasn't been able to understand this since at least the 1980s, but sometimes less is in fact more.
Old 08-18-14 | 11:35 PM
  #3624  
GoldenJCJ's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 32,564
Received 4,778 Likes on 2,989 Posts
From: Colorado
re: Star Wars

But seeing Jabba's eyes bug out when Han steps on his tail is HI-LARIOUS!!

I'll tell you what, George knows funny!
Old 08-19-14 | 05:50 AM
  #3625  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 7,436
Received 92 Likes on 72 Posts
From: Philadelphia, PA
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Guru Askew
Sobering to the nerds who think the world hates George Lucas's prequel trilogy and altered OT. Sobering to the nerds who incorrectly feel their online petitions represent the real world. Sobering to the people who think Disney is on the verge of writing three enormously-successful films off as non-canon even after they've firmly established that the PT is canon even after the mass EU de-canonization.
This is why this debate is so pointless, and I blame George Lucas for creating this rift in the SW fandom.

If he would have just released the OOT versions fully remastered in 2004 on DVD and 2011 on BluRay, this thread would not exist. Nobody cares what versions you like or changes you like, just like no one cares what versions I like. When you make 2 versions of ANYTHING whether it be a movie, a song, a piece of art, etc, naturally you are going to have one base of fans that likes one thing and another base of fans that like another thing. That is what George Lucas never understood!

This isn't about online petitions or people bitching on the internet, its about a demand for a product. Lord of the Rings, Terminator 2, Aliens, ET, Bladerunner, etc, all have multiple versions on DVD and BluRay, why is so hard for Star Wars (which is the most popular franchise in the history of movies) to have a boxset of both versions in the same quality????


Originally Posted by tommynorcal
jedi rocks was like watching a live forced abortion suddenly happen in the middle of a film

Last edited by mcnabb; 08-19-14 at 06:57 AM.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.