Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > HD Talk
Reload this Page >

Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicle BD may have outsold the SD.

Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicle BD may have outsold the SD.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-24-08 | 12:23 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicle BD may have outsold the SD.

This is interesting. On DvdSpot.com they have several Stats that are posted. The Top 20 Active DVDs show the most active DVDs (added, watched, reviewed) in the last 7 days.

The Blu-ray version of Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles had 89 "changes". The SD versions, including the Best Buy exclusive add up to 82 changes. It's hard to believe that there would be more sales of the BD version than SD. Maybe it's just that "videophiles" use services like DVDSpot or something else entirely.

The BD version of T:SCC was street priced nearly the same as the SD and many got it cheaper, through Warner. Hopefully, the pricing, like on this title becomes a trend.

Does anyone know where to find the real numbers on DVDs sold, of the different formats? I'm not sure where to get that info? Of course that would be more accurate than these stats from DVDspot.

Top 20 Active DVDs (last 7 days)
Dexter: The Second Season (97 / 4.68)
Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicle... Blu-Ray(89 / 4.23)
Street Kings (68 / 3.33)
Prom Night (62 / 1.96)
Street Kings (58 / 3.90)
House M.D.: Season Four (46 / 4.59)
Iron Man (46 / 4.41)
Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicle...SD DVD (46 / 4.44)
The Scorpion King 2: Rise of a Warrior (42 / 2.50)
Wizard of Gore (41 / 3.05)
The Proposition (39 / 4.09)
Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicle... Best Buy Steelbook(36 / 4.60)

http://www.dvdspot.com/
Old 08-24-08 | 12:34 PM
  #2  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
It didn't. I 100% guarantee you of that. If the BD gets 10% of the DVD sales that would be great and hopefully pushes Warner to release more TV on BD.

Then again, it gives them the A-OK we are willing to accept standard DD5.1 over TrueHD...
Old 08-24-08 | 04:53 PM
  #3  
Rogue588's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,094
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: WAS looking for My Own Private Stuckeyville, but stuck in Liberty City (while missing Vice City)
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
IIf the BD gets 10% of the DVD sales that would be great and hopefully pushes Warner to release more TV on BD.
I really don't understand why they're not to begin with. They already have the content in HD. Am I missing something? Does it really cost that much more to author a BR disc over a DVD?
Old 08-24-08 | 05:06 PM
  #4  
Adam Tyner's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,730
Received 2,823 Likes on 1,873 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by Rogue588
Does it really cost that much more to author a BR disc over a DVD?
I think it has more to do with opportunity cost than the actual sticker price of production.
Old 08-24-08 | 05:18 PM
  #5  
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,364
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: NY
Right, they're not going to plunk money into something yet that they're not sure would get the sales.
Old 08-24-08 | 06:24 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At the end of the VHS life cycle, they were still about $100, for the first 3 months or so after release. They were really sticking it to the rental places. I'm sure the studios would like to keep prices high as long as possible.
Old 08-24-08 | 06:26 PM
  #7  
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,364
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: NY
VHS tapes were always pretty high for the ones that didn't get day and date released in stores along with the rental stores.
Old 08-25-08 | 06:25 AM
  #8  
Trevor's Avatar
Challenge Guru & Comic Nerd
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 37,371
Received 951 Likes on 611 Posts
From: spiritually, Minnesota
Originally Posted by Rogue588
I really don't understand why they're not to begin with. They already have the content in HD. Am I missing something? Does it really cost that much more to author a BR disc over a DVD?
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
I think it has more to do with opportunity cost than the actual sticker price of production.
Exactly. Why push BR when DVD has 100 times the market base?
Old 08-25-08 | 11:00 AM
  #9  
clckworang's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 9,776
Received 894 Likes on 568 Posts
From: The toe nail of Texas
And I don't think DVDSpot can be considered a good resource for tracking sales. Most people I know have never heard of nor do they have any use for an online DVD database. Most consumers just don't need something like DVDSpot. That would mean that most users there are your more hardcore collector types, who are already more inclined to have gone Blu-ray than the average consumer.
Old 08-25-08 | 07:42 PM
  #10  
DVD Polizei's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 54,564
Received 299 Likes on 223 Posts
Not to mention, many have separate Blu-ray, HD DVD, and SD DVD accounts.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.