soooo.... what are Universal, Paramount/Dreamworks actually waiting for???
#51
Universal is still working on re-designing their new high-def logo. It took them forever to create that HD-DVD logo and that cool "whippy wind" sound effect at the beginning of their menus. Please be patient. Thank you!
#52
Cool New Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Artman
I'm gonna keep my expectations in check and say they'll start with their big new releases 4th qtr (iron man, indy4, hellboy2, mummy3 etc)...hopefully along with some of the more requested catalog's at that time. If it's sooner, great.
#53
Suspended
Originally Posted by sweenytodd
It will definitely be sooner than that - Spiderwick Chronicles will be Paramount's first return to BD.
#54
Cool New Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sony and the BDA need to make damn sure Iron Man gets a day and date release on BluRay. If they dont I would categorize them with Toshiba Management as the biggest group of trained monkeys ever.
I dont think we will se INdy 4 on BD this year because of one simple reason: Spieldberg is a douche.
I dont think we will se INdy 4 on BD this year because of one simple reason: Spieldberg is a douche.
#55
Suspended
Originally Posted by DegenerateX
I dont think we will se INdy 4 on BD this year because of one simple reason: Spieldberg is a douche. 

#56
Cool New Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
When will you be available on Blu-ray?
#58
Cool New Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
...and for fun, you know this how?
#59
Suspended
So they have no intentions of releasing Sweeny Todd, There Will Be Blood, Bee Movie or Cloverfield when work was already started (and I believe completed on some) on them?
#60
Cool New Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
So they have no intentions of releasing Sweeny Todd, There Will Be Blood, Bee Movie or Cloverfield when work was already started (and I believe completed on some) on them?
Of course, maybe Paramount is having their HD-DVD authoring house do work on these BDs and then transition to Sony for the brand new titles which is a possibility. I agree that it doesn't make sense, regardless of costs, why Paramount or Universal wouldn't get these in flux titles out asap. But no, I've heard nothing about those four titles and I'm ususally in a position to hear something.
#61
Suspended
Interesting. I believe we might be surprised if the announcements come next week or the week after from what I have heard. It would ring true with Spiderwick that's for sure...
#62
Spiderwick Chronicles was released almost exactly 2 months ago in theaters. So I'm guessing we won't see anything in stores until June?
And There Will Be Blood better damn well get a BD release in the US this year.
And There Will Be Blood better damn well get a BD release in the US this year.
#63
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Houston, Texas
Speaking of There Will Be Blood, wtf is up with the horrendous case for the dvd? I was at Target looking at the 1 and 2 disc and initially I thought it was some sort of preorder ticket or something.
#64
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by tonymontana313
Speaking of There Will Be Blood, wtf is up with the horrendous case for the dvd? I was at Target looking at the 1 and 2 disc and initially I thought it was some sort of preorder ticket or something.
#65
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Mr. Cinema
And There Will Be Blood better damn well get a BD release in the US this year.
#66
Suspended
Originally Posted by tonymontana313
Speaking of There Will Be Blood, wtf is up with the horrendous case for the dvd? I was at Target looking at the 1 and 2 disc and initially I thought it was some sort of preorder ticket or something.
#69
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Vendetta-AKK
I'm sure this is true about most of us complaining on here. What bothers me most about the wait is that I really want to buy recently releases like Atonement, There Will Be Blood, Etc..., and upcoming releases like Cloverfield, but I don't feel like buying any more standard DVDs, unless I absolutely have to.
It would be nice to know one way or the other. I would buy these on SD if I knew they would never be released on Blu, but until I get some info one way or the other I feel like waiting it out. But, it was awfully hard this week to walk by There Will Be Blood, such a fantastic film.
It would be nice to know one way or the other. I would buy these on SD if I knew they would never be released on Blu, but until I get some info one way or the other I feel like waiting it out. But, it was awfully hard this week to walk by There Will Be Blood, such a fantastic film.
what i don't understand is why they simply cancelled titles like TWWB which had already been announced and were probably in production. why not fill out the remaining schedule until May or June while making preparations to switch over with other producers? it's well known that existing HD DVD facilities could use the same lines as they do for sd, but blu-ray is a whole different set of equipment. it really doesn't make sense imho.
#70
Cool New Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Philadelphia, PA
Originally Posted by brizz
what i don't understand is why they simply cancelled titles like TWWB which had already been announced and were probably in production. why not fill out the remaining schedule until May or June while making preparations to switch over with other producers? it's well known that existing HD DVD facilities could use the same lines as they do for sd, but blu-ray is a whole different set of equipment. it really doesn't make sense imho.
#71
DVD Talk Legend
i'm assuming that is a smart-ass answer...as it isn't the same thing at all. going exclusive to HD meant they had a vested interest in not releasing the blu-rays - i.e. being exclusive. dropping HD DVD was forced on them, and there was no contract, agreement, or any other factor preventing them from selling the hd dvds they already had made or were in the process of making. Given that they won't be able to produce any of those that were already slated for HD for a number of months, it doesn't make any sense to have held the HD versions back. we all know that the first week of release is key to the sales #s, and a blu ray of TWWB in September isn't going to sell for shit compared to what an HD DVD would have sold last week.
#72
Originally Posted by brizz
i'm assuming that is a smart-ass answer...as it isn't the same thing at all. going exclusive to HD meant they had a vested interest in not releasing the blu-rays - i.e. being exclusive. dropping HD DVD was forced on them, and there was no contract, agreement, or any other factor preventing them from selling the hd dvds they already had made or were in the process of making. Given that they won't be able to produce any of those that were already slated for HD for a number of months, it doesn't make any sense to have held the HD versions back. we all know that the first week of release is key to the sales #s, and a blu ray of TWWB in September isn't going to sell for shit compared to what an HD DVD would have sold last week.
It does make sense that they canceled those titles. What store would carry the April releases? Most, if not all, Best Buy and Target stores have gotten rid of their inventories.
#73
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think he was insinuating that HD DVD is anything but dead. I also don't think he is pointing the blame at any stores for discontinuing HD DVD.
I believe the point he's making is that traditionally a title doesn't sell for squat if its release is not day and date with the DVD version. The awareness is there during the first week or two, and then it dies off.
It could definitely be true that had it been released on HD DVD on day one and BD two months from now, it would take the BD version a long time to catch up to the HD DVD version. During the middle of the format war, I think the opposite would have been true as well (now not so much).
I believe the point he's making is that traditionally a title doesn't sell for squat if its release is not day and date with the DVD version. The awareness is there during the first week or two, and then it dies off.
It could definitely be true that had it been released on HD DVD on day one and BD two months from now, it would take the BD version a long time to catch up to the HD DVD version. During the middle of the format war, I think the opposite would have been true as well (now not so much).
#74
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by bunkaroo
I have to wonder if the packaging thing came from P.T. Anderson. Seems like a weird thing for Paramount to try out of the blue (no pun intended).
#75
Suspended
Originally Posted by Mr. Cinema
It does make sense that they canceled those titles. What store would carry the April releases? Most, if not all, Best Buy and Target stores have gotten rid of their inventories.



