![]() |
When BetaNews asked why these manufacturers rushed out players that were not fully capable and potentially buggy due to their BD-J implementation, the Blu-ray partner pointed blame across the room to HD DVD. "We should have waited another year to introduce Blu-ray to the public, but the format war changed the situation," he said. HD DVD was already coming and the BDA had no choice but to launch Blu-ray.] |
Originally Posted by chanster
Hell the BDA CE reps already blamed Toshiba for the release of Blu Ray 1.0 players so the next logical argument for the BluCrew is to blame HDM niche's status on HD DVD as well.
see http://www.betanews.com/article/Blur...nto/1199841379 |
Originally Posted by Drexl
They really only could have delayed it about five months anyway, because the PS3 had to be released in late 2006.
But Sony probably needed other CE support to show consumers that Blu Ray wasn't some "gamer niche" so it pushed the other CE companies to release 1.0 players. But thats my purely my speculation. |
Would those saying that both format needs to exist be sad had Blu-Ray gone the way of the wind?
|
Originally Posted by dsa_shea
Would those saying that both format needs to exist be sad had Blu-Ray gone the way of the wind?
When you hear competition is good, IMO it is typically meant as "Blu-Ray would have shit on everyone had HD DVD not been there to keep them in check." However, HD DVD apparently was perfect out of the gate, so it didn't need to be kept in check. At least that's the impression I get. |
I'm in the camp that competition was good -- I'm very glad there was a format war, and adopters of both formats were better for it -- but I didn't think it was sustainable in the long term.
|
Originally Posted by dsa_shea
Would those saying that both format needs to exist be sad had Blu-Ray gone the way of the wind?
Blu-ray and HD DVD are home theater products. With players priced at $300 and $150 respectively, there is no good reason why a home theater hobbyist shouldn't own both formats. This has never been a hobby for penny-pinchers, and those prices are extremely reasonable. Anyone who believes that a combined $450 is too expensive for access to a large (and growing) library of genuine High Definition content is in the wrong hobby. |
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
I believe that HD media will be more than "niche".
Originally Posted by Josh Z
Unfortunately, what they are bound to find is that even if the war ends today, Blu-ray will remain in niche status for the foreseeable future
Eventually, HDM will supplant DVD as the dominant medium for movies (I can't imagine DVD still being the dominant medium 50 years from now). Not necessarily in the form of HD DVD or Blu-ray, but some form of HDM will takeover DVD sometime in the future. When? That remains to be seen. Most likely not in the next 5 years though. |
Originally Posted by Josh Z
The problem is that certain individuals are using the "HDM won't be a niche" argument to push an agenda that the only way for High Definition Media to break out of this niche is for one format to die, at which point the surviving format (conveniently the one they support) will experience explosive growth and rocket past DVD into mainstream mass acceptance.
Unfortunately, what they are bound to find is that even if the war ends today, Blu-ray will remain in niche status for the foreseeable future, because the public at large just doesn't give a damn about High Definition. All this nonsense about the evil format war and the need for one format to crush the other is pure bunk. There is no good reason why both formats can't coexist. The individual disagrees with what you continuously claim -- that duality was the only structure HD should have adopted and that now when it seems that it all comes to an end the future is incredibly bleak. It is the persistent notion of negativity and the sense that the public is and will be indifferent to any mass adoption process which you promote that is closer to an agenda. On the opposite end there is nothing but enthusiasm about the future of HD. The war, or competitive duality, would have never sustained a productive competition indefinitely. Hence, all recent developments. Pro-B |
Originally Posted by bunkaroo
I think this is a rhetorical question. :)
When you hear competition is good, IMO it is typically meant as "Blu-Ray would have shit on everyone had HD DVD not been there to keep them in check." However, HD DVD apparently was perfect out of the gate, so it didn't need to be kept in check. At least that's the impression I get. Hope that clarifies my position, at least for my posts. HD DVD certainly was not perfect, and I'm not saying it was. I suppose you'd have to poll HD format users to find out if more Blu-ray hardware and software was problematic than HD DVD hardware and software. But that's up to you. Would be interesting though, and I might start a poll which asks if Blu-ray and HD DVD users have experienced hardware and/or software issues. |
I don't think Blu-Ray has had too many hardware problems, but obviously the Java junk constantly keeping Samsung and LG owners from watching discs is unacceptable. For that reason alone I will never buy a Samsung or LG BD player.
On the HD DVD side, combos of course have been the worst thing about the format IMO. There's also the aforementioned 1080p issue with the A20/A30/A35 players. I would have been a much bigger supporter of the format if combos had never existed. As it is, against my better judgment I've still bought some in the past few months. |
Originally Posted by Josh Z
Unfortunately, what they are bound to find is that even if the war ends today, Blu-ray will remain in niche status for the foreseeable future, because the public at large just doesn't give a damn about High Definition. All this nonsense about the evil format war and the need for one format to crush the other is pure bunk. There is no good reason why both formats can't coexist.
|
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
I'm in the camp that competition was good -- I'm very glad there was a format war, and adopters of both formats were better for it -- but I didn't think it was sustainable in the long term.
I'm curious, do you actually have to be an actual owner of the BLU-RAY format to be a mod in this forum ???? |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:25 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.