Will WB's Blu-ray decision impact Criterion?
#26
Moderator
Originally Posted by Mammal
Criterion LD prices were $40-100 as I recall - and they were slow to adopt anamorphic video as well as DVD. Their approach to new technology has been rather conservative.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
I find it funny that someone who prides themselves on owning almost every Criterion, a company whose very existence is predicated upon releasing films of artistic merit in the highest quality possible, would not see the point in high definition media.
#28
DVD Talk Special Edition
Doesnt matter to me either way, I'd purchase just about anything they'd release.
But where's this article about Sony making that offer to Criterion from one of the above posts?
But where's this article about Sony making that offer to Criterion from one of the above posts?
#29
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, let me explain myself a little:
- Yes, I own 2 HDTV's. I've also just purchased a $6,000 HD projector to install at work (as I am over the AV department). I also work at the Weather Channel and am involved in building our new HD studio here. It still makes me laugh to have TWC in HD. I know about HD. I think sports look great on them. Star Wars looks great on them. Just not sure how 30's -40's B&W films are going to look 'that much better' on them, not do I think they were intended for HD, nor do I care. I like the images to be cleaned up and restored as much as the next guy, but I'm one of the people who has seen blu-ray and just kinda said 'ok' what's the fuss about? It's not that better than DVD and I don't need it to be better than DVD to watch say, 'Beauty and the Beast'. People compare it to the jump from VCR to DVD and I just don't buy it. Sure, there's more pixels, blah blah blah, but face it, it doesn't look THAT different to the casual eye. Yes, I've seen MANY examples when I went HDTV shopping.
- I'm not made of endless money. It's a constant war of finding coupons, saving money, getting gifts, etc. that gets me my Criterion fix. I try and buy used as much as possible because I love the films. This isn't just Criterion but all of the films I collect. I primarily love the movie itself, then I go to quality and then DVD packaging. Paying $60-$100 for a Blu-ray Criterion is not going to happen. I think they can be overpriced as it is - paying $30 bucks to watch 'Dance on Film' was a tough sale for me. No way I'd pay $40, $50, etc.
- I HATE, yes HATE is the word, blu-ray packaging. It's a gimmick to differentiate it from HD-DVD and it takes away from the artwork. Yes, I do care about such things, what can I say, it's a hobby. I do print and convert all snappers, slim packs, box sets, etc. to keepcases. I like my library to look uniform on the shelf - let the insults fly. My deepest horror is having to convert every single Blu-ray disc to keep case, which I think is far superior in appearance to the glowing blue tiny box.
- No, my DVD players will not stop working the day Criterion cuts over. Good point. However, I do 'collect' DVD's. However silly that may sound to some of you, I do this and have done it for almost 10 years now. This does not mean that I will buy every DVD I own or want over again, far from it. It means basically that I will stop collecting altogether, specifically expensive titles like Criterion releases. I do not have the will to go through ANOTHER re-issue-athon with Criterion. I'm not buying Seven Samurai a 3rd time, or the Lady Vanishes. You just know that the first thing they will do, is re-issue a ton of old releases to BRD and that means a slow down in new titles. Now, I'm sure any of you can guffaw and pick apart this, the weakest if my arguments, but it doesn't change the way I feel.
Now that I have said all that - I recognize that all of your points are logical and probably 'right'. My argument is emotional (perhaps irrational) and is based on fear of change in doing what has been the most exciting hobby for me in my life. I was wary of DVD when it came out and didn't want to replace my VHS collection, but I did. I just wish that I saw as huge a benefit to dvd to bluray.
- Yes, I own 2 HDTV's. I've also just purchased a $6,000 HD projector to install at work (as I am over the AV department). I also work at the Weather Channel and am involved in building our new HD studio here. It still makes me laugh to have TWC in HD. I know about HD. I think sports look great on them. Star Wars looks great on them. Just not sure how 30's -40's B&W films are going to look 'that much better' on them, not do I think they were intended for HD, nor do I care. I like the images to be cleaned up and restored as much as the next guy, but I'm one of the people who has seen blu-ray and just kinda said 'ok' what's the fuss about? It's not that better than DVD and I don't need it to be better than DVD to watch say, 'Beauty and the Beast'. People compare it to the jump from VCR to DVD and I just don't buy it. Sure, there's more pixels, blah blah blah, but face it, it doesn't look THAT different to the casual eye. Yes, I've seen MANY examples when I went HDTV shopping.
- I'm not made of endless money. It's a constant war of finding coupons, saving money, getting gifts, etc. that gets me my Criterion fix. I try and buy used as much as possible because I love the films. This isn't just Criterion but all of the films I collect. I primarily love the movie itself, then I go to quality and then DVD packaging. Paying $60-$100 for a Blu-ray Criterion is not going to happen. I think they can be overpriced as it is - paying $30 bucks to watch 'Dance on Film' was a tough sale for me. No way I'd pay $40, $50, etc.
- I HATE, yes HATE is the word, blu-ray packaging. It's a gimmick to differentiate it from HD-DVD and it takes away from the artwork. Yes, I do care about such things, what can I say, it's a hobby. I do print and convert all snappers, slim packs, box sets, etc. to keepcases. I like my library to look uniform on the shelf - let the insults fly. My deepest horror is having to convert every single Blu-ray disc to keep case, which I think is far superior in appearance to the glowing blue tiny box.
- No, my DVD players will not stop working the day Criterion cuts over. Good point. However, I do 'collect' DVD's. However silly that may sound to some of you, I do this and have done it for almost 10 years now. This does not mean that I will buy every DVD I own or want over again, far from it. It means basically that I will stop collecting altogether, specifically expensive titles like Criterion releases. I do not have the will to go through ANOTHER re-issue-athon with Criterion. I'm not buying Seven Samurai a 3rd time, or the Lady Vanishes. You just know that the first thing they will do, is re-issue a ton of old releases to BRD and that means a slow down in new titles. Now, I'm sure any of you can guffaw and pick apart this, the weakest if my arguments, but it doesn't change the way I feel.
Now that I have said all that - I recognize that all of your points are logical and probably 'right'. My argument is emotional (perhaps irrational) and is based on fear of change in doing what has been the most exciting hobby for me in my life. I was wary of DVD when it came out and didn't want to replace my VHS collection, but I did. I just wish that I saw as huge a benefit to dvd to bluray.
Last edited by Kerborus; 01-24-08 at 08:04 AM.
#30
Banned by request
Well, you just admitted that this isn't a rational issue for you, so we probably won't be able to change your mind anyway. However, you did say you had similar separation anxiety going from VHS to DVD. Couldn't it simply be that it's the change that bothers you?
#31
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Kerborus
Just not sure how 30's -40's B&W films are going to look 'that much better' on them, not do I think they were intended for HD,
#32
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
If Wikipedia is correct, Criterion's last Laserdisc was Boogie Nights in 1998, and their first DVD was Grand Illusion in 1999. They were slower than most to embrace DVD.
Originally Posted by PopcornTreeCt
Pretty sure that's not correct. Grand Illusion got the #1 spot but it came out a very long time after the first one. I think it was either The Lady Vanishes or Seven Samurai that was actually the first released.
http://www.lddb.com/laserdisc/8537/C...-Edition-(1998)
Yes, they went from Citizen Kane (first Criterion LD) to Armageddon (last Criterion LD), a perfect chronicle of the best and worst that the filmmaking art has to offer.
#33
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 28,818
Received 1,881 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
Moral of the story: ignore Wikipedia.
#36
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I really like Blu-ray and HD DVD cases. One thing I didn't like about DVD, is that the cases that different movies came in were not the same across the board. I thought everything should be in keep cases, and hated snappers and paper cases that special editions came in. Sure there may be two different case styles for each hi-def media, but they are the same size and look great in a collection. The only different case i've seen other than tv shows is Close Encounters, but I didnt like that movie anyway.
#38
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 925
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Doesn't the Close Encounters slipcase actually contain a standard BD case and a booklet? If somebody didn't like the outer box they could always just put the movie part in the shelf.
#39
DVD Talk Special Edition
Originally Posted by cardaway
Doesn't the Close Encounters slipcase actually contain a standard BD case and a booklet? If somebody didn't like the outer box they could always just put the movie part in the shelf.
#40
DVD Talk Special Edition
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
If Wikipedia is correct, Criterion's last Laserdisc was Boogie Nights in 1998, and their first DVD was Grand Illusion in 1999. They were slower than most to embrace DVD.
Last edited by paradicelost; 01-25-08 at 06:08 PM.
#41
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Kerborus
It still makes me laugh to have TWC in HD.
Just not sure how 30's -40's B&W films are going to look 'that much better' on them, not do I think they were intended for HD, nor do I care.
Check out the HD DVD of "Casablanca" sometime.
- I HATE, yes HATE is the word, blu-ray packaging. It's a gimmick to differentiate it from HD-DVD and it takes away from the artwork.
I do not have the will to go through ANOTHER re-issue-athon with Criterion. I'm not buying Seven Samurai a 3rd time, or the Lady Vanishes. You just know that the first thing they will do, is re-issue a ton of old releases to BRD and that means a slow down in new titles. Now, I'm sure any of you can guffaw and pick apart this, the weakest if my arguments, but it doesn't change the way I feel.
Now that I have said all that - I recognize that all of your points are logical and probably 'right'. My argument is emotional (perhaps irrational) and is based on fear of change in doing what has been the most exciting hobby for me in my life. I was wary of DVD when it came out and didn't want to replace my VHS collection, but I did. I just wish that I saw as huge a benefit to dvd to bluray.
#42
DVD Talk Legend
Grand Illusion was not an early Criterion release. They had already changed their logo by the time that one came out. It is numbered 1, but doesn't match the ones that come right after it with the old logo. The were planning on releasing it first, but a new print was found and they delayed it until they could release a more complete edition.
#43
Originally Posted by paradicelost
I don't see how they were slow to embrace dvd, it seems like it took them less than a year to release library titles on dvd. They released dvds before paramount which didn't release there first run till october of 98. and few other companies.
They embraced LaserDisc which never hit the mainstream and then DVD almost as soon as they hit.
Blu-ray has had a better adoption rate in the first year than DVD had in theirs. The war is over. What is taking Criterion so long?
#45
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by SomethingMore
Didn't Criterion release their first DVD after they discontinued their last Laserdisc?
I don't think they're near ready to drop DVD...
I don't think they're near ready to drop DVD...
#46
Originally Posted by True_Story1011
Doesnt matter to me either way, I'd purchase just about anything they'd release.
But where's this article about Sony making that offer to Criterion from one of the above posts?
But where's this article about Sony making that offer to Criterion from one of the above posts?
#47
DVD Talk Special Edition
Originally Posted by droidguy1119
I have no link, sorry. It was just what I heard. And it makes enough sense to me, having heard how much of a hardass Sony is about licensing.
Its cool Thanks for at least replying