Why aren't all HD discs significantly better than SD?
#26
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Havok83
I got Species on Blu bc of hte 5 free deal and the picture quality is horrible. It doesnt look HD at all
#29
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Doesn't the encoding scheme matter? As I understand it even at high bit rates MPEG-2 is visibly inferior (artifacts) to AVC and VC-1, and many early Blu-Ray releases used MPEG-2 because their authoring tools weren't up to snuff.
#30
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by aynrandgirl
Doesn't the encoding scheme matter? As I understand it even at high bit rates MPEG-2 is visibly inferior (artifacts) to AVC and VC-1, and many early Blu-Ray releases used MPEG-2 because their authoring tools weren't up to snuff.
The compression codec used is much less important than the competence of the operator doing the encoding. It's just a spec, and it's not worth getting obsessed about. What matters are results, not specs.




