Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > HD Talk
Reload this Page >

Why aren't all HD discs significantly better than SD?

Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

Why aren't all HD discs significantly better than SD?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-24-08 | 10:33 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Havok83
I got Species on Blu bc of hte 5 free deal and the picture quality is horrible. It doesnt look HD at all
Species is one of Sony's earlier Blu-rays and it's known that the transfer isn't the best in the world.
Old 01-24-08 | 10:48 AM
  #27  
Dr. Henry Jones, Jr.'s Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: My Car
because HD is a scam
Old 01-24-08 | 06:51 PM
  #28  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 3,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Eden
Your blind!
Old 01-26-08 | 09:23 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doesn't the encoding scheme matter? As I understand it even at high bit rates MPEG-2 is visibly inferior (artifacts) to AVC and VC-1, and many early Blu-Ray releases used MPEG-2 because their authoring tools weren't up to snuff.
Old 01-26-08 | 09:58 AM
  #30  
Josh Z's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,962
Received 350 Likes on 243 Posts
From: Boston
Originally Posted by aynrandgirl
Doesn't the encoding scheme matter? As I understand it even at high bit rates MPEG-2 is visibly inferior (artifacts) to AVC and VC-1, and many early Blu-Ray releases used MPEG-2 because their authoring tools weren't up to snuff.
If given enough room to breathe, MPEG2 is perfectly capable of great picture quality. Kingdom of Heaven and Black Hawk Down are a couple of "reference" discs using MPEG2. The problem with early Blu-rays is that they weren't given enough room to breathe, and the people authoring the discs didn't pay enough attention to the quality of the work they were doing.

The compression codec used is much less important than the competence of the operator doing the encoding. It's just a spec, and it's not worth getting obsessed about. What matters are results, not specs.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.