Knocked Up disappointment and combo discs in general....
#26
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you could just rip-and-re-encode in the first place, then the need for combos would drop substantially. If I had a choice, I would much rather risk a 50 cent disposable DVD copy rather than a ~$30 original in my car or anywhere outside of the normal media room.
#27
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
I have never had an issue with combos and the $5 more will not kill me or make me eat Top Ramen for a week. I assume anyone who has either an HD DVD or Blu-ray Player is not poor and can afford the extra price of these discs. Its amazing how many people will complain about a $30 Universal Combo disc but will happily buy a $40 Fox Blu-ray movie with a 'theatrical trailer and TV Spot' as extras.
#31
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by The Cow
How so?
Even though HD Combo discs are double sided, you only need to play 1 side of it to finish the movie. The only time I ever even bother with the SD side is to compare the difference of SD/HD to friends. And since my discs are never left out out the case unless I'm watching the film, I have never owned a double sided disc with scratches on it nor never had a problem with playback. So while I would perfer disc artwork, I really don't care if the disc is double sided.
Last edited by DeanoBKN; 09-02-07 at 06:02 PM.
#32
DVD Talk God
I don't care about disc art. I hate combos. I hate them because of the extra price (and there is an extra price) and because of the issues they have.
Combo discs will not help HD-DVD. When there is a release I want and it is offered on BR and a combo HD-DVD, I have bought the BR every time.
Combo discs will not help HD-DVD. When there is a release I want and it is offered on BR and a combo HD-DVD, I have bought the BR every time.
#34
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As long as the movie itself is in high definition, I'm fine. I couldn't care less about saving a couple of dollars or having artwork. I've also never had a single problem with any combo disc, so I have no concerns with the combo concept. As far as the extras, I guess I fall into a different camp than most, as I prefer the movie over extras. You can give the standard DVD five discs of extras and I'd take a bare bones HD version in an instant. But like I said, I value the movie and its video/audio quality a thousand fold over anything else.
#35
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by The Bus
Nope. Blu-Ray counterparts are not as pricy and even old releases that were combos like Army of Darkness and King Kong were still expensive.
#36
Premium Member
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Grazing in a field somewhere...
Posts: 23,646
Received 702 Likes
on
467 Posts
Originally Posted by Dean Kousoulas
The term "flippers" is what you call a disc that you need to stop midway and turn over to finish the movie. Warner Brothers did this quite a bit in the past (Goodfellas, Sleepers, A Time To Kill, etc)
Even though HD Combo discs are double sided, you only need to play 1 side of it to finish the movie. The only time I ever even bother with the SD side is to compare the difference of SD/HD to friends. And since my discs are never left out out the case unless I'm watching the film, I have never owned a double sided disc with scratches on it nor never had a problem with playback. So while I would perfer disc artwork, I really don't care if the disc is double sided.
Even though HD Combo discs are double sided, you only need to play 1 side of it to finish the movie. The only time I ever even bother with the SD side is to compare the difference of SD/HD to friends. And since my discs are never left out out the case unless I'm watching the film, I have never owned a double sided disc with scratches on it nor never had a problem with playback. So while I would perfer disc artwork, I really don't care if the disc is double sided.
I have often heard of DVDs that had widescreen (whatever variety) on one side and full screen (4:3) on the others referred to as flippers. I see that terminology is wrong.
#37
I call any DVD I have to flip over, for any f'in reason, a FLIPPER. So, you're just fine.
I agree, there should be a separate SD DVD included with the HD release if they want to include both versions. But personally, I don't like Combos at all. It just means my HD disc will be used that much more. And I don't like that. Imagine if someone wants to borrow one of my movies, and they don't have an HD player. This means I'm lending them not only the SD version, but the much more expensive HD version as well with not much of a choice but to tell them, "No". I don't loan my DVDs anymore but with this Combo thing, I certainly will not.
I agree, there should be a separate SD DVD included with the HD release if they want to include both versions. But personally, I don't like Combos at all. It just means my HD disc will be used that much more. And I don't like that. Imagine if someone wants to borrow one of my movies, and they don't have an HD player. This means I'm lending them not only the SD version, but the much more expensive HD version as well with not much of a choice but to tell them, "No". I don't loan my DVDs anymore but with this Combo thing, I certainly will not.
#38
Originally Posted by The Cow
Thanks.
I have often heard of DVDs that had widescreen (whatever variety) on one side and full screen (4:3) on the others referred to as flippers. I see that terminology is wrong.
I have often heard of DVDs that had widescreen (whatever variety) on one side and full screen (4:3) on the others referred to as flippers. I see that terminology is wrong.
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
DVDs cost pennies to make. If they want to include both versions to help push the format, it should be a seperate SD disc.
#39
Cool New Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can't wait for Knocked Up. And I have no problem with the Combo format, as I buy all my discs through amazon with the 10% discount, and $25 for a new release with a DVD on the flip-side is worth it to me. If the B&M retailers would just discount the titles 20% or more like they do with DVD's there would be no problem.
As for the comparison to Blu-Ray, at least Universal hasn't charged $50 MSRP for a single title like Sony just did with Spiderman 3! Now THAT'S ridiculous.
As for the comparison to Blu-Ray, at least Universal hasn't charged $50 MSRP for a single title like Sony just did with Spiderman 3! Now THAT'S ridiculous.
#40
Originally Posted by Bob_Black
I can't wait for Knocked Up. And I have no problem with the Combo format, as I buy all my discs through amazon with the 10% discount, and $25 for a new release with a DVD on the flip-side is worth it to me. If the B&M retailers would just discount the titles 20% or more like they do with DVD's there would be no problem.
As for the comparison to Blu-Ray, at least Universal hasn't charged $50 MSRP for a single title like Sony just did with Spiderman 3! Now THAT'S ridiculous.
As for the comparison to Blu-Ray, at least Universal hasn't charged $50 MSRP for a single title like Sony just did with Spiderman 3! Now THAT'S ridiculous.
#41
Suspended
Originally Posted by Bob_Black
As for the comparison to Blu-Ray, at least Universal hasn't charged $50 MSRP for a single title like Sony just did with Spiderman 3! Now THAT'S ridiculous.
#42
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
Seriously, now, is ANYONE going to buy JUST Spider-Man 3 on Blu-ray? For like $20 extra bucks you get a bare bones (ugh) Spider-Man 1 and 2. I'll gladly buy the Trilogy for $65 off Amazon instead of just Spider-Man 2 for $45+.
#44
Suspended
Originally Posted by Hammer99
Your dollars are off but I agree 100%... can't wait till the Trilogy is mine!
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Meriden , CT
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Still its inexcusable to bump off the extra material, and thats what I care more about than disc art or SD on the opposite side. They shouldn't forget that it was all these extras that got me (and others I'm sure) into dvd in the first place. The way I see it, I pay a premium for HD, I should get the premium product. Unless they change it I guess its SD 2 disc for me. too bad.
#46
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
Until this is listed in an ad, we have no idea what stores will charge for S3. The MSRP is $44. I imagine Best Buy will sell it for $34.99 the first week and $39.99 the normal price. The trilogy has a MSRP of $93, and I imagine BB will have it for $65/$70 the first week. Who knows though.
#47
DVD Talk Special Edition
Originally Posted by highclassrob
Still its inexcusable to bump off the extra material, and thats what I care more about than disc art or SD on the opposite side. They shouldn't forget that it was all these extras that got me (and others I'm sure) into dvd in the first place. The way I see it, I pay a premium for HD, I should get the premium product. Unless they change it I guess its SD 2 disc for me. too bad.
#48
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by DVD Polizei
I agree, there should be a separate SD DVD included with the HD release if they want to include both versions.
#49
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 28,831
Received 1,884 Likes
on
1,239 Posts
...although Tartan UK looks to be doing this with some of their Blu-ray releases. I have a hard time seeing that approach being widely adopted on these shores, though.