Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > HD Talk
Reload this Page >

Razor Digital IMAX goes Blu-Ray exclusive

Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

Razor Digital IMAX goes Blu-Ray exclusive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-24-07 | 11:38 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Razor Digital IMAX goes Blu-Ray exclusive

http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/sh...X_Classics/799

Razor Digital Announces Blu-ray Support with Quartet of IMAX Classics

Indie distributor Razor Digital has announced it will throw its hat into the high-def ring this fall, exclusively supporting Blu-ray with an initial launch slate of four IMAX classics.

Arriving in stores November 13 will be a quartet of IMAX favorites: 'Africa: The Serengeti,' 'Alaska: Spirit of the Wild,' 'Australia: Land Beyond Time' and 'Antarctica: An Adventure of a Different Nature.'

Citing Blu-ray's larger installed hardware base for its exclusive support of the format, Razor Digital said they have no current plans to release on titles on HD DVD, although they didn't rule out the possibility.

"You have to respond to the marketplace," Mitch Perliss, Razor Digital EVP told Home Media Magazine. "We wanted to go worldwide (with the product), and we couldn't afford to do both (Blu-ray and HD DVD)."

Razor Digital has not yet released tech specs or supplemental details for its four IMAX launch titles, but we'll keep you posted.

Retail price will be a suggested $19.95 each.
Old 07-24-07 | 12:15 PM
  #2  
Drexl's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 16,077
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
From: St. Louis, MO
Hopefully they'll respect the OAR of those titles.
Old 07-24-07 | 12:15 PM
  #3  
Giles's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 33,646
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Washington DC
I might buy, after the discs have been released and reviewed - I'm very wary after the whole 'Chronos' debacle. Can't wait to see the HiDef IMAX discs from Warner's next week!
Old 07-24-07 | 01:02 PM
  #4  
Josh Z's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,962
Received 350 Likes on 243 Posts
From: Boston
Originally Posted by Giles
I'm very wary after the whole 'Chronos' debacle.
What "debacle" would that be?
Old 07-24-07 | 01:09 PM
  #5  
Adam Tyner's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,711
Received 2,803 Likes on 1,864 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
I'm not sure if this is what Giles is referring to, but there was an authoring problem with the Blu-ray version that made it unplayable on the PS3, at least in certain situations. From RBFilms:

Now, now..before you go commenting about our QC Process, which is one of the most thorough possible, you need to understand why this happened.

First and foremost, we tested the disc on EVERY available BD Player and multiple versions of the SONY PS3 with various Firmware Updates. We use the same lab that produces many of the Major Studio releases, so our QC Process is exactly the same as many of major release you own.

The problem, in this case, turns out to be an incompatible setting that the Authoring System defaults to. This setting did not cause any problems on any player, including PS3 Players, which we tested this disc on, until AFTER Sony decided to change the default setting in their latest PS3 Firmware.

This had nothing to do with our "QC" and it is strictly related to evolving development of the spec and the default settings for the firmware as Sony sees fit to update on a regular basis while the player manufacturers and the authoring system software / hardware developers attempt to keep up with it all.

I know of these QC Labs you speak of but we use THX on many releases for our QC on standard DVD Discs. In the old days, these labs were of value because every Hardware Manufacturer interpreted the "DVD Spec" in their own unique way. Nowadays, the best labs ... which is all we use .. have a huge list or anomalies and work-a-rounds for the quirkiness of players that they incorporate in to most Standard Definition DVD discs.

Bottom line. The problem is with the Hardware Manufacturers, not the DVD Software in most cases.

Every HD-DVD and BD Disc on the market is defective. Most people just don't realize it because the problems may not be immediately apparent.

Also, if I produced a DVD Disc strictly to the paper spec, I can assure you that it would have some issues on certain DVD Players out there.

This is a fact of life and we accept it, although we do not accept the blame for the ongoing misinterpretation and lack of communication amongst the Technology Developers, Hardware Manufacturers and Software Developers of the A/V Production Tools.
Old 07-24-07 | 01:17 PM
  #6  
Giles's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 33,646
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Washington DC
Originally Posted by Josh Z
What "debacle" would that be?
BR getting the priority with better audio specs and video transfer.
The HD-DVD edition getting an inferior transfer.
Old 07-24-07 | 07:35 PM
  #7  
Josh Z's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,962
Received 350 Likes on 243 Posts
From: Boston
Originally Posted by Giles
BR getting the priority with better audio specs and video transfer.
The HD-DVD edition getting an inferior transfer.
The audio specs are indeed different, but they're the same video transfer. They're labelled differently because the head of R&B is an argumentative personality and refuses to believe that HD DVD discs can be encoded at 1080p24, even though he's been repeatedly informed by numerous authoring experts that his very own disc is encoded that way.
Old 07-24-07 | 10:44 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Mpls, MN
Originally Posted by Drexl
Hopefully they'll respect the OAR of those titles.
1:1?
Old 07-24-07 | 11:16 PM
  #9  
Drexl's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 16,077
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally Posted by Spiky
1:1?
It's 1.33:1 (or 1.44:1 according to some accounts).
Old 07-25-07 | 08:47 AM
  #10  
Giles's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 33,646
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Washington DC
Originally Posted by Josh Z
The audio specs are indeed different, but they're the same video transfer. They're labelled differently because the head of R&B is an argumentative personality and refuses to believe that HD DVD discs can be encoded at 1080p24, even though he's been repeatedly informed by numerous authoring experts that his very own disc is encoded that way.
what a douche.
Old 07-25-07 | 02:31 PM
  #11  
Paul_SD's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,822
Received 88 Likes on 64 Posts
From: Hiking the Sisyphian trail
anyone know if these Imax films were filmed on a format larger than 35mm? Or were they originally on 35mm and then blown up for Imax exhibition?

if it was the former, should we be expecting the masters used on these to be the same masters that were on the original dvds? Would those be from reduction prints?

I'm surprised that Razor couldn't afford to produce product on the less expensive platform (that probably also skews to an older demographic), yet can afford to pay the mandatory AACS license fees associated with Bd.

Not surprised that more companies are jumping into HD to release their 'nature docs' after seeing the sales figures for Planet Earth. It will be interesting to see how many of these Razor moves in Q4 up against big budget hollywood blockbusters and tv series all vying for PS3 owners money. I might actually get a couple- if the true potential of the PQ is realized.
Old 07-25-07 | 07:44 PM
  #12  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Mpls, MN
Current Imax film is 70x70mm film. (for over 10 years) I don't know about these particular shows, though.
Old 07-26-07 | 08:42 AM
  #13  
Giles's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 33,646
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Washington DC
Originally Posted by Paul_SD
anyone know if these Imax films were filmed on a format larger than 35mm? Or were they originally on 35mm and then blown up for Imax exhibition?

if it was the former, should we be expecting the masters used on these to be the same masters that were on the original dvds? Would those be from reduction prints?

I'm surprised that Razor couldn't afford to produce product on the less expensive platform (that probably also skews to an older demographic), yet can afford to pay the mandatory AACS license fees associated with Bd.

Not surprised that more companies are jumping into HD to release their 'nature docs' after seeing the sales figures for Planet Earth. It will be interesting to see how many of these Razor moves in Q4 up against big budget hollywood blockbusters and tv series all vying for PS3 owners money. I might actually get a couple- if the true potential of the PQ is realized.
according to imdb - all (except 'Australia: Land Beyond Time' ) are noted as being shot on and with IMAX cameras. Their aspect ratios are 1.44:1

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.