Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > HD Talk
Reload this Page >

HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray vs. everything else free-for-all

Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray vs. everything else free-for-all

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-12-06 | 05:27 PM
  #1151  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
Someone on AVS made a good point...

What if it's the discs making BD look bad? Is that even possible? I'm saying...not the player...not the encoding...but the discs? I wouldn't think so since it's just a digital media.
Could it be that the more tightly compressed data on BD is more difficult to read than on an HD-DVD, which results in a less stable image? I'm not nearly informed enough to know if that would actually make a visible difference, but it came to mind.
Supermallet is offline  
Old 07-12-06 | 06:56 PM
  #1152  
darkside's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 19,879
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
From: San Antonio
Originally Posted by bboisvert
You've just learned one of the scary truths of life.
I have to admit this does happen on almost every subject I know something about. They will have glaring mistakes that make you shake your head. I don't say I have always believed everything I see or read, but I never really thought about just how wrong they could be on nearly every topic they cover. [shudder]
darkside is offline  
Old 07-12-06 | 09:34 PM
  #1153  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by Blitz6Speed
choo choo choo choo.. choo choo choo choo..

Blu-Train is commin at ya.
Uh, you must have missed the new hd-dvd campaign site and its coming soon list...Also, WB exec talking about releasing huge titles before end of year (lord of rings, matrix trilogy).

So, 4 titles from WB to BD is not exactly a train.

Sony fanboy
RockStrongo is offline  
Old 07-12-06 | 09:51 PM
  #1154  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,676
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by Blitz6Speed
choo choo choo choo.. choo choo choo choo..

Blu-Train is commin at ya.
I wonder how long the train will run powered on shit? will you be on it still shoveling for Sony?
ChrisHicks is offline  
Old 07-12-06 | 10:27 PM
  #1155  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
Interesting post/rumor:

http://www.hddvd.org/messageboard/to...0733387ed8cbce

"Holy crud, that reminds me! Totally forgot to post this. Last week I had lunch with a buddy of mine who works at a DVD authoring house. He knew I had just gotten an HD player (and was the only person in the building who owned one apparently), so he took me on a quick tour of HD DVD authoring and their Blu-Ray department. The HD DVD group looked busy, but I was told they weren't having too many problems. However, in the room where they were working on an upcoming Blu-Ray title, it was a different story. He poked his head in, said "You guys alright?" A short grunt was the only reply from the room, at which point my friend said, "Yeah, they're having lots of problems with Blu-Ray. No one here likes it."

I'm not sure what any of that might mean, only that this particular authoring house prefers HD DVD to Blu-Ray... I was even told they were thinking about not taking on too many Blu-Ray titles, as it was slowing everything down.

Take it how you will."
It just seems like it's more difficult to get a single BD out, period. Having to create entire new lines of manufacturing, plus low yields plus MPEG 2 = disaster in the making.

By the way, did you get my PM on AVS?
Supermallet is offline  
Old 07-12-06 | 10:53 PM
  #1156  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
It just seems like it's more difficult to get a single BD out, period. Having to create entire new lines of manufacturing, plus low yields plus MPEG 2 = disaster in the making.

By the way, did you get my PM on AVS?
Yes sir
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 07-12-06 | 11:28 PM
  #1157  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
It just seems like it's more difficult to get a single BD out, period. Having to create entire new lines of manufacturing, plus low yields plus MPEG 2 = disaster in the making.
Ill be curious when these WB titles come out and we can compare....it will be bery bery interesting.
RockStrongo is offline  
Old 07-12-06 | 11:31 PM
  #1158  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Has it been confirmed that WB will be using MPEG 2 for these initial releases?
Supermallet is offline  
Old 07-12-06 | 11:58 PM
  #1159  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
Has it been confirmed that WB will be using MPEG 2 for these initial releases?
Again, no. All Cjplay said over on AVS was that some of the initial releases would be in MPEG2 because the transfers were already done. After that, they would all be VC1. He didn't specify which movies would and wouldn't.
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 07-13-06 | 12:08 AM
  #1160  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Actually, that's even better. That will allow us to compare some of the movies in MPEG 2 against VC-1, and some VC-1 against VC-1.
Supermallet is offline  
Old 07-13-06 | 03:13 AM
  #1161  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,045
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
Fuck BD.

Ooops. did i just say that?
Originally Posted by Fettastic
It's a sad day indeed.
Originally Posted by Eric D.
Why the hell are they getting Good Night, and Good Luck! A HD DVD announcement better be on its way. Fuck Sony and fuck BD.
Originally Posted by kvrdave
That train will be delayed or derailed again, so no biggie.
Originally Posted by ChrisHicks
I wonder how long the train will run powered on shit? will you be on it still shoveling for Sony?

Shameful. Truly shameful. What a serenade of threadcrapping. I thought trolling was a no-no outside the free-for-all thread. And the moderators probably think it's funny too.
Grubert is offline  
Old 07-13-06 | 03:14 AM
  #1162  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grubert

Couldnt agree more. Pathetic it is. The only thing you can do is understand why they do it, which is 100% un-adulterated fear.
Blitz6Speed is offline  
Old 07-13-06 | 05:32 AM
  #1163  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Grubert
Shameful. Truly shameful. What a serenade of threadcrapping. I thought trolling was a no-no outside the free-for-all thread. And the moderators probably think it's funny too.
I don't disagree, but it is important to note that the many of these comments were precipitated by Blitz (whose sole job seems to be threadcrapping and trolling). His comment here, to me, is suspension worthy just because it was made to rile people up.

I agree with the sentiment that finally we'll be able to do a side-by-side of the same movie. That may be very enlightening.
Qui Gon Jim is offline  
Old 07-13-06 | 05:43 AM
  #1164  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,045
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Qui Gon Jim
I don't disagree, but it is important to note that the many of these comments were precipitated by Blitz (whose sole job seems to be threadcrapping and trolling). His comment here, to me, is suspension worthy just because it was made to rile people up.
Yeah, whereas those who put in a sad emoticon, said "it is a sad day", or wished Blu-ray to go fuck itself (all those before Blitz's post) did it in the interest of an intelligent debate and don't deserve such harsh punishment at all.

Gotta love double standards.
Grubert is offline  
Old 07-13-06 | 07:03 AM
  #1165  
raven56706's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,766
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Back in the Good Ole USA
its funny how the underdog is getting the respect and the one that was going to destroy the competition is getting bashed....

still i will wait to see who is the winner in the format war
raven56706 is offline  
Old 07-13-06 | 08:25 AM
  #1166  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Grubert
Yeah, whereas those who put in a sad emoticon, said "it is a sad day", or wished Blu-ray to go fuck itself (all those before Blitz's post) did it in the interest of an intelligent debate and don't deserve such harsh punishment at all.

Gotta love double standards.
Sorry. Should we be lavishing it with praise at this point??

Sony and BD (at the moment) are one huge stinking joke.

I'd love for you to go into why you're still defending it...even though I'm sure you'll say you don't have to.
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 07-13-06 | 08:36 AM
  #1167  
Adam Tyner's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,698
Received 2,799 Likes on 1,861 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by Grubert
And the moderators probably think it's funny too.
No. I just haven't been keeping as close an eye on some of these threads since the forum's become a little more active.

There's a reason that "Report this post to a moderator" button is there.
Adam Tyner is online now  
Old 07-13-06 | 08:53 AM
  #1168  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
I dont get why it was a sad day either.

HD-DVD had MUCH bigger announcements over the past 2 or 3 days anyways and maybe they are saving their best announcement for today.

Just yesterday, they announced that Batman Begins and HP4 will be released in Q3 AND that LOTR, Matrix trilogy, and Shawshank will be out by year's end.

Add that to the huge $150 million marketing campaign and I think its been a good week (not to mention the HUGE coming soon list on their new site).

BD had a good week too I guess....they got a couple movies that weve had out for a while and one that isnt on hd-dvd. Maybe WB was throwing them a bone??
RockStrongo is offline  
Old 07-13-06 | 09:00 AM
  #1169  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
I dont get why it was a sad day either.

HD-DVD had MUCH bigger announcements over the past 2 or 3 days anyways and maybe they are saving their best announcement for today.

Just yesterday, they announced that Batman Begins and HP4 will be released in Q3 AND that LOTR, Matrix trilogy, and Shawshank will be out by year's end.

Add that to the huge $150 million marketing campaign and I think its been a good week (not to mention the HUGE coming soon list on their new site).

BD had a good week too I guess....they got a couple movies that weve had out for a while and one that isnt on hd-dvd. Maybe WB was throwing them a bone??
Yeah but BD can look at all these HD DVD announcements and say "yay! That means we'll get them eventually too!"

I'm not thrilled that WB and P are playing both sides of the fence but...I was never really partial to bisexuals either.
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 07-13-06 | 09:09 AM
  #1170  
darkside's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 19,879
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
From: San Antonio
Originally Posted by Blitz6Speed
Grubert

Couldnt agree more. Pathetic it is. The only thing you can do is understand why they do it, which is 100% un-adulterated fear.


Yeah, because if Blu-ray does win out in a year or two we will be completely unable to buy Blu-ray players.

We are supporting HD DVD because currently it is by far the superior format. When and if Blu-ray gets it's shit together there is nothing stopping us from supporting it. Most of us aren't blind, ignorant fanboys we are in it for the movies. Granted Blu-ray has got a lot of of things to get right before I can forget all the lies they have built the format on so far.

All these Blu-ray titles announcements are meaningless to me since I will not go back and buy any titles that are Mpeg2 encoded on single layered media.

Last edited by darkside; 07-13-06 at 09:12 AM.
darkside is offline  
Old 07-13-06 | 09:09 AM
  #1171  
Mr. Cinema's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 18,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Where's the part that says Paramount has announced BD titles? I saw a couple posts at AVS that mentioned Paramount and BD, but I didn't find any announcements.
Mr. Cinema is offline  
Old 07-13-06 | 09:14 AM
  #1172  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,505
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Mr. Cinema
Where's the part that says Paramount has announced BD titles? I saw a couple posts at AVS that mentioned Paramount and BD, but I didn't find any announcements.
You didn't find any announcements because there weren't any yet.
Eric D. is offline  
Old 07-13-06 | 09:40 AM
  #1173  
Adam Tyner's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,698
Received 2,799 Likes on 1,861 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by darkside
When and if Blu-ray gets it's shit together there is nothing stopping us from supporting it.
I agree. I've never understood the "partisan" nature of this whole mess anyway. Why does it have to be a "one-or-nothing" proposition the way so many people are painting? I had every intention on buying a Blu-ray player at launch, but the initial batch of hardware and software wound up being lousy, so I opted to hold off.

I think Sony's making a long series of astonishingly stupid mistakes, but I'm in it for the movies, and if the highest quality way to see the films I love requires buying a Blu-ray deck, then I'm game. We're not there yet, though.
Adam Tyner is online now  
Old 07-13-06 | 09:49 AM
  #1174  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
I think Sony's making a long series of astonishingly stupid mistakes, but I'm in it for the movies, and if the highest quality way to see the films I love requires buying a Blu-ray deck, then I'm game. We're not there yet, though.
Yet? We're not even close.

Have we heard or seen one advancement from BD since it was announced? It's just been a series of disappointments.

I'll have zero problems supporting BD if it eventually is "the winner" but that will only happen when HD DVD is dead. If that means living without Sony movies in HD until then, so be it. I'm sure there will be other means of getting them on HD DVD by that point anyway.
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 07-13-06 | 09:58 AM
  #1175  
Adam Tyner's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,698
Received 2,799 Likes on 1,861 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
Yet? We're not even close.
I don't mean to make it sound like it'll be in October or anything. I don't know when...or even if...Blu-ray will ever take advantage of its heavily-touted potential.

I just mean that my allegiance is to the movies, not to the hardware, and if Blu-ray (or some other technology entirely) offers a more attractive solution, I'll cheerfully buy in. I want the highest quality video I can watch today -- 'cause 'potential' doesn't have much in the way of entertainment value -- and right now, that's HD DVD.
Adam Tyner is online now  


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.