Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > HD Talk
Reload this Page >

HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray vs. everything else free-for-all

Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray vs. everything else free-for-all

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-05-06 | 11:01 AM
  #951  
Adam Tyner's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,734
Received 2,826 Likes on 1,874 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
I'm just struggling with the fact that someone who writes on a third grade level makes enough money to be a home theater enthusiast.

(By the way, if you haven't been keeping up, kevinca1 says he prefers Blu-ray because the image is more film-like than HD DVD.)
Adam Tyner is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 11:06 AM
  #952  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Mpls, MN
Originally Posted by Josh Z
All of the Sony Blu-ray discs have uncompressed PCM 5.1, and the Samsung player is capable of outputting it over HDMI or 6-channel analog. However, those "uncompressed" tracks have been downsampled to 16-bit resolution from the 24-bit master. In other words, they're a 100% faithful replica of an inferior copy.
Yep, CD audio is not what I'm looking for. I was actually referencing Phantom on HDDVD, which has TrueHD, IIRC. Probably only 5.1, but it's the only positive sign I've seen for the audio side of HD discs. I believe there are more than just Phantom, but with exactly zero players announced/shipping that can play the new formats (stereo doesn't count), I haven't bothered cataloging which discs might be worthwhile. I'll pay closer attention when it matters.

I've never even seen Phantom (in any form), don't know if I'd like it or not, probably would. But I'd buy this disc just for the audio. If I could play it.
Spiky is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 11:06 AM
  #953  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,445
Received 287 Likes on 196 Posts
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by Blitz6Speed
I couldnt care less, to be honest. I am seriously tired of argueing with hd-dvd owners, and i just wanted to point out that the article was stating false information which is propoganda for its cause, aka, bs.

So if you're tired of us... why bother posting here anymore?
candyrocket786 is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 11:06 AM
  #954  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,676
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by candyrocket786
So if you're tired of us... why bother posting here anymore?
because he is the voice of reason. if he doesn't sell us on Blu-Ray the world will end.
ChrisHicks is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 12:08 PM
  #955  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by ChrisHicks
because he is the voice of reason. if he doesn't sell us on Blu-Ray the world will end.
I dont get the whole "pick a side and defend it until death" mentality. Ive seen it alot of the BD side and just cant figure it out. Its not like these are your favorite sports teams or something.

I see pros/cons on both sides of this format....both are making missteps and will have their surges. Right now, its clear that HD-DVD is making an impact. Like I said before, BD could have a huge boost in Nov though.

I would LOVE to see a BD supporter criticize Sony/Lionsgate for the poor pic quality and lack of special features. THEN, praise HD-DVD pic/audio quality and substantial special features. Most of them wont though.

As ive said before, I am invested in HD-DVD right now because its currently the best choice. But, they have their issues too (A1 player issues, no 1080p support yet and lack of release titles as promised). I can easily admit these things.
RockStrongo is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 12:14 PM
  #956  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
But, they have their issues too (lack of release titles as promised). I can easily admit these things.
On this note, I think it would be a great place to cross-post something that Grubert put on AVS. In actuality, they aren't having a "lack of promised release titles." In fact, they seem to be right on schedule.

To sum up: according to Warner's initial schedule, they aimed to have 24 titles out in eight weeks. It's now week 12 of the format's life (in America), and as of now Warner has released 18 titles. If we add next week's releases, and if Warner releases a couple other titles for 07/18 and 07/25, they'll hit 24 titles (their initial objective for week 8) in week 15.
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...&&#post7946224
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 12:27 PM
  #957  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
On this note, I think it would be a great place to cross-post something that Grubert put on AVS. In actuality, they aren't having a "lack of promised release titles." In fact, they seem to be right on schedule.
Well, the fact that they promised certain titles (like Batman Begins, Matrix and so on) closer to launch is what i am talking about.

If all the titles in the booklet thats included with the discs (like Batman Begins, Troy, Matrix, Shawshank and so on) are all released this summer (like the booklet says). I will be happy.

Its just frustrating not getting much of a warning from WB about their releases while we all wait on our hands for the titles above.

Im sure others agree that the HD-DVD release has had its frustrations.

Last edited by RockStrongo; 07-05-06 at 12:30 PM.
RockStrongo is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 12:27 PM
  #958  
Adam Tyner's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,734
Received 2,826 Likes on 1,874 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
In actuality, they aren't having a "lack of promised release titles." In fact, they seem to be right on schedule.
It looks to me as if the post you're quoting is saying the exact opposite -- that Warner's release schedule in practice lags far, far behind the schedule they initially announced before all of the format delays.
Adam Tyner is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 12:30 PM
  #959  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
It looks to me as if the post you're quoting is saying the exact opposite -- that Warner's release schedule in practice lags far, far behind the schedule they initially announced before all of the format delays.
D'oh. You're right. I'm at work and not doing my math. Sorry.

Last edited by digitalfreaknyc; 07-05-06 at 12:34 PM.
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 12:31 PM
  #960  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
No. The # of discs is right on track. The titles may be different but the # of discs they wanted to have out is still the same.
To me, the titles are far more important than the #......I dont give a shit about Dukes of Hazard. Bring out the big guns WB!!!
RockStrongo is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 12:35 PM
  #961  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
To me, the titles are far more important than the #......I dont give a shit about Dukes of Hazard. Bring out the big guns WB!!!
I agree. But I find it interesting that BB and HP are both "slated" to come out on the same day late in the summer...exactly when they said they'd start the hard launch. It would be interesting if that's when they started to ramp up production on the players AND were able to publicize these new huge titles.
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 12:35 PM
  #962  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,676
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
To me, the titles are far more important than the #......I dont give a shit about Dukes of Hazard. Bring out the big guns WB!!!
thats my take as well. you just have to love the idea that they'll release the bigger titles when more players are sold yet many won't buy the players until they can get the bigger titles.
ChrisHicks is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 12:38 PM
  #963  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
I agree. But I find it interesting that BB and HP are both "slated" to come out on the same day late in the summer...exactly when they said they'd start the hard launch. It would be interesting if that's when they started to ramp up production on the players AND were able to publicize these new huge titles.
I dont go by rumored dates....until WB actually announces the release, I dont consider them coming out soon. Even then, they could delay the release if needed.

We will see what happens in the coming weeks, but so far, things have definately quieted when I thought we would know more by now.

1. WB only 2 releases scheduled that havent been released (Dukes and Enter the Dragon).
2. Still no word from Paramount on their releases.

NOT encouraging news at this point.

Last edited by RockStrongo; 07-05-06 at 12:40 PM.
RockStrongo is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 12:43 PM
  #964  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
I dont go by rumored dates....until WB actually announces the release, I dont consider them coming out soon. Even then, they could delay the release if needed.

We will see what happens in the coming weeks, but so far, things have definately quieted when I thought we would know more by now.

1. WB only 2 releases scheduled that havent been released (Dukes and Enter the Dragon).
2. Still no word from Paramount on their releases.

NOT encouraging news at this point.
What were you expecting? WB only announces a week or two TOPS before they come out.

Paramount's delay has nothing to do with the format. That's been confirmed.

I think everyone needs to relax. Anyone who's going to complain about the titles (or lack thereof) shouldn't have bought into it already. Anything could happen at this point. As long as they're making the discs, I'm happy. Would I like them to come out faster? Sure. But I'm putting a bit of faith in HD DVD at this point. They seem to know what they're doing thus far and there's been no major fuck-ups as of yet. If there were, I don't think any of us would have bought one.

Last edited by digitalfreaknyc; 07-05-06 at 12:46 PM.
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 12:44 PM
  #965  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,676
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Michigan
here's a little "what if" scenario - what if Toshiba/Sony actually did come to a truce and decided to combine the 2 formats. what if this new format mad all current hardware/software obsolete. if you just bought into HD-DVD/BD how upset would you be?
ChrisHicks is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 12:47 PM
  #966  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by ChrisHicks
here's a little "what if" scenario - what if Toshiba/Sony actually did come to a truce and decided to combine the 2 formats. what if this new format mad all current hardware/software obsolete. if you just bought into HD-DVD/BD how upset would you be?
Not much. I have an upconverting player that cost me about $300. I could give it to my parents. No big loss.

And I seriously doubt the existing software would be obsolete. Nothing that drastic could change within 2 months of a formats launch.
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 12:49 PM
  #967  
Adam Tyner's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,734
Received 2,826 Likes on 1,874 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by ChrisHicks
if you just bought into HD-DVD/BD how upset would you be?
I wouldn't be. That's the risk of being an early adopter: you pays your money and you takes your chances.

Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
Anyone who's going to complain about the titles (or lack thereof) shouldn't have bought into it already.
It's still a good bit slower than I expected, and having two weeks with a grand total of one title between 'em doesn't help. It wouldn't be so bad if I at least knew when we would be getting something from some of these other studios or officially what titles Warner has in the pipeline.

I don't regret buying into HD DVD at this early stage, but it's not the "centerpiece" of my movie-watching the way I was expecting it to be.
Adam Tyner is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 12:56 PM
  #968  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
What were you expecting? WB only announces a week or two TOPS before they come out.
Yes, and thats another issue with the HD-DVD releases that I havent liked.

Paramount's delay has nothing to do with the format. That's been confirmed.
Whether its the format or not doesnt matter to me. Im not saying that HD-DVD is bad because of these things....Im just bringing up issues that we who have bought into HD-DVD are facing.

I think everyone needs to relax. Anyone who's going to complain about the titles (or lack thereof) shouldn't have bought into it already.
I think your way off here....Its not ignorant or even naive to expect that WB was going to release the titles promised at launch or even release them as stated in the booklets inside the disc packaging.

Like Adam said, Im happy with my purchase but would like to see these titles coming out.
RockStrongo is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 01:03 PM
  #969  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,676
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Michigan
I just wish 1 BD studio would jump over to HD-DVD. I don't really care which one. it would give more options for movies and maybe pave the way for others to follow. hell, I'd love to have House of 1000 Corpses or The Devils Rejects on HD-DVD.
ChrisHicks is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 01:07 PM
  #970  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
I think your way off here....Its not ignorant or even naive to expect that WB was going to release the titles promised at launch or even release them as stated in the booklets inside the disc packaging.
Is it the end of summer yet? No. Then there's no reason to think that WB won't deliver.

As I said, everyone needs to take a deep breath. Everything is up in the air ESPECIALLY with how calculated this release is seeming to be.

Do i want more titles? Hell yes. Do I have my money out and waiting? Hell yes. Do I wish my player booted up faster? Hell yes. But it doesn't leave me any less excited about what is happening right now. We're just not seeing it as quickly as we'd have liked.
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 01:12 PM
  #971  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
Everything is up in the air ESPECIALLY with how calculated this release is seeming to be.
This is my entire point and is why I am complaining. Short announcement window, missed release dates and delayed releases. I think thats pretty clear.

There is no question that studios have been running into issues with both formats....otherwise, we probably would have seen all the promised titles on their promised dates (per CES or whenever they announced).

Whether or not its specific to HD-DVD doesnt matter. It still affects the format.
RockStrongo is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 01:33 PM
  #972  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
This is my entire point and is why I am complaining. Short announcement window, missed release dates and delayed releases. I think thats pretty clear.

There is no question that studios have been running into issues with both formats....otherwise, we probably would have seen all the promised titles on their promised dates (per CES or whenever they announced).

Whether or not its specific to HD-DVD doesnt matter. It still affects the format.
But I think you're missing the bigger picture. BD's delay has delayed some of the strategy for HD. What happens to one, affects the other. WB said they'd have certain titles out by the end of summer and that means that they should have them out by the end of September. If they don't, then I think we can complain. Short announcements? Enh. Yeah...i guess it's not very good but does it really affect anything severely? The only people really clamouring for new material are us noobs. There haven't been been any missed release dates or postponements on the software side thus far.
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 01:40 PM
  #973  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
But I think you're missing the bigger picture. BD's delay has delayed some of the strategy for HD.
I dont understand this then. I dont buy it. I think manufacturing issues are more likely the case. There doesnt seem to be any reason they cannot release HD-DVD. We all know that supposedly Batman Begins and Harry Potter are ready to go.

What happens to one, affects the other. WB said they'd have certain titles out by the end of summer and that means that they should have them out by the end of September. If they don't, then I think we can complain.
Well, im not only going by the booklets stating summer 2006 for those titles, but also the announcements before launch. They were overly optimistic in their release plan before launch. There is NO question about that.

Short announcements? Enh. Yeah...i guess it's not very good but does it really affect anything severely?
It does affect those of us who have HD-DVD and follow the releases. We would be MUCH more confident if they would announce a date and let us pre-order via amazon or whatever. Even if its 2 months ahead. Universal has this part right.

The only people really clamouring for new material are us noobs. There haven't been been any missed release dates or postponements on the software side thus far.
Yes there have been missed dates.

Paramount has delayed their titles. A couple others have been moved around. That doesnt even mention the announced dates before launch that WB has not missed.
RockStrongo is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 01:44 PM
  #974  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
I honestly think if the studios who have HD-DVD titles ready to go (Batman Begins, HP, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and so on), would release them, we would see a bigger buzz about HD-DVD.

Look at what happened to the 360, the buzz was so big around it that when they couldnt keep up with demand for players, they were still selling software and accessories.

I bet alot more people would pre-order the players and buy the movies they want BEFORE they even get the player.

I dont think its strategy to hold off on the media releases. It just doesnt make sense to me.

I can only buy manufacturing issues being the culprit.
RockStrongo is offline  
Old 07-05-06 | 01:45 PM
  #975  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
I wasn't thinking about pre-release dates because once the players were pushed back, so were the discs. I was thinking more about after release.

However, You're right about Paramount. That's my bad.

Batman Begins ready to go? Where'd you hear that? about 3 weeks ago they were still working on it. That's inaccurate.

It does affect those of us who have HD-DVD and follow the releases. We would be MUCH more confident if they would announce a date and let us pre-order via amazon or whatever.
Uhh..i have it and I follow it. How much more confident do you want to be? You have a player. What are you going to do? Sell it? I don't get this.
digitalfreaknyc is offline  


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.