Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > HD Talk
Reload this Page >

HD DVD and Blu-ray FAQ

Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

HD DVD and Blu-ray FAQ

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-07 | 02:59 PM
  #176  
Josh Z's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,962
Received 350 Likes on 243 Posts
From: Boston
Originally Posted by Joe Schmoe
You're right: I guess I don't understand. Why have 2 speakers side by side? Years ago when I bought my 6.1 receiver, 7.1 receivers were available but DVDs maxed out at 6.1 channels. So that begged the question: why have 2 rear speakers?
If they're used at all, the center rear channels are designed primarily for ambient sound to fill in the back soundstage, not for specific directional effects. Using 2 rear speakers helps to dispurse the audio better.

Even if there is meant to be a discrete effect to those channels, human hearing is not particularly distinct when it comes to noises directly behind your head. It's better that the sound come from slightly off to each side.

I assume BDs and HD DVDs send discrete signals to the rear speakers with 7.1 surround,
98% of all Hollywood movies are mixed for 5.1. Most professional sound designers don't put a lot of credence into the usefulness of 6.1 or 7.1.

To date there are only 2 Blu-ray discs with 7.1 audio (The Descent, and the Japanese release of Ghost in the Shell 2: Innocence), and no HD DVDs.

but if the rear speakers are positioned side by side how do you distinguish between them (the sounds)? Wouldn't the sound from them sound like they're coming from the same point in the room (as if they were one speaker)? To eliminate that problem, shouldn't they be separated? But if you separated them, wouldn't that leave a gap where you would place a center rear speaker? I'm so confused.
They're not literally butting up against one another. Here's how mine are positioned.



My chair sits right in between them.
Old 01-10-07 | 10:21 AM
  #177  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by Josh Z
If they're used at all, the center rear channels are designed primarily for ambient sound to fill in the back soundstage, not for specific directional effects. Using 2 rear speakers helps to dispurse the audio better.

Even if there is meant to be a discrete effect to those channels, human hearing is not particularly distinct when it comes to noises directly behind your head. It's better that the sound come from slightly off to each side.



98% of all Hollywood movies are mixed for 5.1. Most professional sound designers don't put a lot of credence into the usefulness of 6.1 or 7.1.

To date there are only 2 Blu-ray discs with 7.1 audio (The Descent, and the Japanese release of Ghost in the Shell 2: Innocence), and no HD DVDs.



They're not literally butting up against one another. Here's how mine are positioned.



My chair sits right in between them.
Thanks for your help and the picture!

I'm curious though... There's a scene in Disney's "The Haunted Mansion" where musical instruments chase Eddie Murphy. At one point, a drum can be heard as if it were directly behind the viewer (via the rear center channel). The sound matches where the drum is off screen. (I believe both the DVD and the BD are only 5.1, so I think my receiver is working its magic and creating a DD EX experience.) My question is, if I watch this same scene with 7.1 channels, will the drum still sound like it's directly behind me, or will I hear 2 drums over my shoulders instead of one directly behind me?
Old 01-10-07 | 10:42 AM
  #178  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts
Why don't studios offer uncompressed audio on all HD discs? Don't they go back to the master when they make HD versions of movies? Why do consumers have to settle for DD+ and DTS HD instead of getting lossless audio? (And in some cases, consumers don't even get DD+ or DTS HD: for instance, we have to settle for DD EX and DTS ES on the "Terminator 2" BD, which is exactly the same as the DVD.)

Why don't studios offer some form of Dolby and DTS on every HD disc, especially if the DVD version of the same movie did? Don't HD discs have the storage space for it?

Technically speaking, how does 5.1 Dolby Digital Plus compare to 5.1 DTS? DD+ is offered on many HD discs, but sometimes I'm more impressed with the DTS track on DVDs. Case in point, the DTS track on "Jurassic Park" kicks more ass than the DD+ tracks on several HD DVDs I own.
Old 01-10-07 | 11:57 AM
  #179  
Josh Z's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,962
Received 350 Likes on 243 Posts
From: Boston
Originally Posted by Joe Schmoe
There's a scene in Disney's "The Haunted Mansion" where musical instruments chase Eddie Murphy. At one point, a drum can be heard as if it were directly behind the viewer (via the rear center channel). The sound matches where the drum is off screen. (I believe both the DVD and the BD are only 5.1, so I think my receiver is working its magic and creating a DD EX experience.) My question is, if I watch this same scene with 7.1 channels, will the drum still sound like it's directly behind me, or will I hear 2 drums over my shoulders instead of one directly behind me?
If the sound is sent to both speakers in equal amplitude at the same time, it will sound like one drum.
Old 01-24-07 | 09:54 PM
  #180  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tampa, FL
Will I see a noticible improvement in PQ if I play Blu-Ray movies on my 46" Samsung 720P DLP over my current SD DVDs?
Old 01-25-07 | 10:09 AM
  #181  
lizard's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 7,944
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: the Western Slope, Colorado
Originally Posted by Jamers
Will I see a noticible improvement in PQ if I play Blu-Ray movies on my 46" Samsung 720P DLP over my current SD DVDs?
Very likely yes, but it will depend on your seating distance, as explained in this chart:
http://www.carltonbale.com/wp-conten...tion_chart.png

(But bear in mind that a well upscaled SD DVD will look somewhat better than just 480i or 480p.)
Old 01-25-07 | 10:40 AM
  #182  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: CALI!
Originally Posted by Jamers
Will I see a noticible improvement in PQ if I play Blu-Ray movies on my 46" Samsung 720P DLP over my current SD DVDs?

YES.
Old 01-25-07 | 12:31 PM
  #183  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tampa, FL
It's curious to me that they'd have 1440p on that chart. That's not a standard. It's not available now. I don't see it becoming available in the future.
Old 01-26-07 | 11:20 AM
  #184  
lizard's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 7,944
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: the Western Slope, Colorado
Originally Posted by Jamers
It's curious to me that they'd have 1440p on that chart. That's not a standard. It's not available now. I don't see it becoming available in the future.
Chi Mei Optoeletronics has announced that it will be releasing a 47 Inch 1440p LCD display in the second quarter of 2007:
http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/10/17...p-lcd-in-2007/

BTW, while 1440p is not yet an approved standard, the HDMI 1.3 specs can handle up to 1440p video bandwidth. It has been reported that the Sony PS3 will be able to handle 1440p displays.

Even if 1440p doesn't get adopted as a video standard, such displays ought to be able to upscale lesser inputs, such as 1080p, and look pretty good.

You didn't really think that 1080p was the end, did you?

Last edited by lizard; 01-26-07 at 11:33 AM.
Old 02-20-07 | 07:59 PM
  #185  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,337
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What's the difference between MPEG-2/MPEG-4 and AVC MPEG-4?
Old 05-29-07 | 03:59 AM
  #186  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Moscow, Russia
Sorry if this was asked before, but I couldn't find the answer using search and reading this FAQ so...
I'm interested in two things. First - will one of the formats (HD-DVD or BluRay) eventually push another out of the market so that only one remains? And second - will DVDs be finally replaced by any of these formats so that no DVDs will be produced at all?
Old 05-29-07 | 04:55 AM
  #187  
Drexl's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 16,077
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally Posted by Giggles
Sorry if this was asked before, but I couldn't find the answer using search and reading this FAQ so...
I'm interested in two things. First - will one of the formats (HD-DVD or BluRay) eventually push another out of the market so that only one remains? And second - will DVDs be finally replaced by any of these formats so that no DVDs will be produced at all?
No one knows. One HD format will probably prevail eventually, but it's going to be a long time before DVDs are not produced. My guess is that DVD will be around for another 8-10 years (remember, it was only a couple of years ago that new releases stopped being available in VHS).
Old 05-29-07 | 05:54 AM
  #188  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Moscow, Russia
Originally Posted by Drexl
No one knows. One HD format will probably prevail eventually, but it's going to be a long time before DVDs are not produced. My guess is that DVD will be around for another 8-10 years (remember, it was only a couple of years ago that new releases stopped being available in VHS).
Thanks a lot, Drexl. My only consolation is that DVD discs themselves will last if not forever, but for a very long time. VHS tapes' life term was quite short, but DVDs will be playable even when I'm old
Old 05-29-07 | 07:11 AM
  #189  
Josh Z's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,962
Received 350 Likes on 243 Posts
From: Boston
Originally Posted by Giggles
Thanks a lot, Drexl. My only consolation is that DVD discs themselves will last if not forever, but for a very long time. VHS tapes' life term was quite short, but DVDs will be playable even when I'm old
So long as your player doesn't die.
Old 05-29-07 | 03:17 PM
  #190  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Moscow, Russia
Originally Posted by Josh Z
So long as your player doesn't die.
I just hope there'll always be handymen who can fix anything. As long as they exist people will be able even to watch VHS in 31st century (if some cassettes are still alive )
Old 05-29-07 | 05:03 PM
  #191  
Drexl's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 16,077
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
From: St. Louis, MO
Josh, do you really think not being able to play DVDs would be a problem later on? Would they drop the capability from HD disc players?
Old 05-29-07 | 05:59 PM
  #192  
Josh Z's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,962
Received 350 Likes on 243 Posts
From: Boston
Originally Posted by Drexl
Josh, do you really think not being able to play DVDs would be a problem later on? Would they drop the capability from HD disc players?
No, they wouldn't drop the feature from HD players. But many people continue to predict that all forms of physical media will eventually be phased out in favor of internet downloads. I don't exactly agree with that, but it's the fear.
Old 05-30-07 | 02:59 AM
  #193  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Moscow, Russia
Originally Posted by Josh Z
No, they wouldn't drop the feature from HD players. But many people continue to predict that all forms of physical media will eventually be phased out in favor of internet downloads. I don't exactly agree with that, but it's the fear.
I don't agree either. We can download now too, but we still choose to buy discs. Many people like all those fancy covers besides it's this feeling of having something physical that can be put on a shelf. Movie collection on a hard disc? That's lame.
Old 05-30-07 | 05:05 AM
  #194  
Drexl's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 16,077
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally Posted by Giggles
I don't agree either. We can download now too, but we still choose to buy discs. Many people like all those fancy covers besides it's this feeling of having something physical that can be put on a shelf. Movie collection on a hard disc? That's lame.
In addition, they will produce things like steelbooks and tins where people will pay extra solely for the special packaging.
Old 05-30-07 | 08:46 AM
  #195  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Moscow, Russia
Originally Posted by Drexl
In addition, they will produce things like steelbooks and tins where people will pay extra solely for the special packaging.
Amen
Old 06-10-07 | 06:18 PM
  #196  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,368
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I saw references in other threads that Fox is in the Blu-Ray camp... but is not releasing any titles.

Can the FAQ be updated with:

1. Why they made the decision not to release titles?
2. Is there is any official word or speculation when they will start releasing Blu-Ray discs?

Thanks.
Old 06-10-07 | 10:07 PM
  #197  
Drexl's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 16,077
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally Posted by bwvanh114
I saw references in other threads that Fox is in the Blu-Ray camp... but is not releasing any titles.

Can the FAQ be updated with:

1. Why they made the decision not to release titles?
2. Is there is any official word or speculation when they will start releasing Blu-Ray discs?

Thanks.
That would be nice, if anyone actually knew. Fox hasn't said anything other than something vague like "production issues" (which curiously don't seem to be affecting the output of Warner, Sony, or Paramount). The speculation is that they're waiting for BD+, which isn't supposed to be ready until this fall at the earliest.
Old 06-11-07 | 06:44 AM
  #198  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,368
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Drexl
That would be nice, if anyone actually knew. Fox hasn't said anything other than something vague like "production issues" (which curiously don't seem to be affecting the output of Warner, Sony, or Paramount). The speculation is that they're waiting for BD+, which isn't supposed to be ready until this fall at the earliest.
Ah... Thanks for the info.
Old 07-23-07 | 05:46 PM
  #199  
Suspended
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to a sony insider, BD+ is finished. It was about to be released on a few discs, but the 3rd gen BD players were finished so they decided to test them thoroughly on them (BD-J 1.1 PiP) and now that it is complete, we should see some fox releases at some point. Copy protection WAS the reason they stopped releasing, but they should be back soon and with TrueHD as the audio codec of choice now.
Old 07-25-07 | 04:34 AM
  #200  
TheBigDave's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 12,706
Received 645 Likes on 454 Posts
From: Florida
I've got a stupid newbie question.

I just ordered a Toshiba HD-A2. My TV is a Hitachi 57F510 with an HDMI input. Do I need a Home Theater set-up for the audio, or can the sound play through my TV speakers? Are there any HD-DVD audio formats that require a home theater?

I don't know much about the HD audio formats. I know that without a home theater, I'm unable to play SD DVDs with DTS audio. So I'm wondering if I'll have a similar problem with HD-DVDs.

Thanks in advance.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.