new members in politics
#1
DVD Talk Legend & 2019 TOTY Winner
Thread Starter
new members in politics
I share the opinion of others that newbies shouldn't be in politics
too many post and run members of late
obviously nothing is perfect but a minimum of say 2500 posts before they can post there may weed out a lot of the trolling
too many post and run members of late
obviously nothing is perfect but a minimum of say 2500 posts before they can post there may weed out a lot of the trolling
#2
Administrator
Re: new members in politics
I'll bring this up to the mods, although the barrier will most certainly not be in the thousands. Trolling is something we've been talking about in particular.
#4
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Part of the Left-Wing Conspiracy
Posts: 7,476
Received 179 Likes
on
100 Posts
Re: new members in politics
Yea, even 250 posts would be decent. I support this idea. Heck I have been on Macrumors for 13 years and only have 49 posts, and still can't post in their "political" threads.
#5
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: True North Strong & Free
Posts: 20,383
Received 1,358 Likes
on
963 Posts
Re: new members in politics
Yeah, a minimum of 2500 posts might be a bit much, but I think members having at least a 100 or 200 posts before being able to participate in the politics forum would be a great idea.
#7
DVD Talk Hero
Re: new members in politics
Or, when you spot an obvious troll, add them to your ignore list, and don't respond to them.
They will eventually go away if nobody engages with them.
They will eventually go away if nobody engages with them.
#8
DVD Talk Legend
Re: new members in politics
Is there any work being done on fixing the forum so ignoring TRULY ignores people, so if someone quotes them, that stuff is still blocked? On another forum I'm on, a user ended up writing a chrome extension to block out quoted ignored people. I spent about 5 minutes seeing if I could twerk that get it work on this forum, but didn't have any luck.
#9
Administrator
Re: new members in politics
Is there any work being done on fixing the forum so ignoring TRULY ignores people, so if someone quotes them, that stuff is still blocked? On another forum I'm on, a user ended up writing a chrome extension to block out quoted ignored people. I spent about 5 minutes seeing if I could twerk that get it work on this forum, but didn't have any luck.
#12
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: new members in politics
Based on past experience, I don't think IB will be endorsing or supporting anything that relates to using an ad blocker on this site. Whole posts have been deleted just for mentioning ad blockers.
Last edited by IBJoel; 10-23-19 at 12:07 PM.
#13
Administrator
#14
DVD Talk Legend
Re: new members in politics
That's fine and all, but if someone had the smarts, they could easily write an extension that just looks for that one little flag, and marks any <div> with that in it as invisible. It doesn't HAVE to be done inside of adblocker.
#15
DVD Talk Legend
Re: new members in politics
Which reminds me, I actually tried something like that a while ago. You know those chrome extensions that change "Trump" to "Drumph"? That source code is readily available. Basically, it cycles through every element in a web page, searches for "trump" and just replaces it to "drumph". So I tried to change it so it cycles through all the elements, looks for any indicator that the element is a ignored comment, and then sets it to invisible. It's pretty simple code. The issue I had was that I'm not really an HTML programmer, so I couldn't figure out how to tell if the current element was an ignored comment or not. Someone with HTML experience could probably pound that out in an hour or so.
#16
Senior Member
Re: new members in politics
2500 minimum, that's insane! LOL I've been here since the beginning (lurked, then joined) and around 10 years ago in a chess move that went horribly wrong a mod removed over half of my post count when I joked about leaving the forum when I hit a certain post count number. That said, even if my post count was reinstated to it's "true" number I still wouldn't qualify under the 2500 minimum rule. Thankfully, only I and the mod (possibly?) know my true post count. It's all moot, considering I rarely go into the Politics forum unless we're talking about Jeffery Epstein. And even rarer that I would ever create a new thread. Just my two cents. Shalom!