![]() |
new members in politics
I share the opinion of others that newbies shouldn't be in politics
too many post and run members of late obviously nothing is perfect but a minimum of say 2500 posts before they can post there may weed out a lot of the trolling |
Re: new members in politics
Originally Posted by Bacon
(Post 13620614)
I share the opinion of others that newbies shouldn't be in politics
too many post and run members of late obviously nothing is perfect but a minimum of say 2500 posts before they can post there may weed out a lot of the trolling I'll bring this up to the mods, although the barrier will most certainly not be in the thousands. Trolling is something we've been talking about in particular. |
Re: new members in politics
Edit: nvm |
Re: new members in politics
Yea, even 250 posts would be decent. I support this idea. Heck I have been on Macrumors for 13 years and only have 49 posts, and still can't post in their "political" threads.
|
Re: new members in politics
Yeah, a minimum of 2500 posts might be a bit much, but I think members having at least a 100 or 200 posts before being able to participate in the politics forum would be a great idea.
|
Re: new members in politics
Politics gets more traffic than any other forum on the site, generating the ad revenue that supports less popular forums. How can we keep new members out?
|
Re: new members in politics
Or, when you spot an obvious troll, add them to your ignore list, and don't respond to them.
They will eventually go away if nobody engages with them. |
Re: new members in politics
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 13621501)
Or, when you spot an obvious troll, add them to your ignore list, and don't respond to them.
They will eventually go away if nobody engages with them. |
Re: new members in politics
Originally Posted by joeblow69
(Post 13621612)
Is there any work being done on fixing the forum so ignoring TRULY ignores people, so if someone quotes them, that stuff is still blocked? On another forum I'm on, a user ended up writing a chrome extension to block out quoted ignored people. I spent about 5 minutes seeing if I could twerk that get it work on this forum, but didn't have any luck.
|
Re: new members in politics
Joel, what is your job? Are you the customer service guy?
|
Re: new members in politics
Originally Posted by IBJoel
(Post 13621670)
Can you PM me the forum and Chrome extension? I'll see if there's any way we can work with it or give our tech guys ideas (likely it does not work with our site because that other forum doesn't use vBulletin v3).
|
Re: new members in politics
Originally Posted by joeblow69
(Post 13628572)
Post Deleted
|
Re: new members in politics
Originally Posted by kefrank
(Post 13628662)
Based on past experience, I don't think IB will be endorsing or supporting anything that relates to using an ad blocker on this site. Whole posts have been deleted just for mentioning ad blockers.
|
Re: new members in politics
That's fine and all, but if someone had the smarts, they could easily write an extension that just looks for that one little flag, and marks any <div> with that in it as invisible. It doesn't HAVE to be done inside of adblocker.
|
Re: new members in politics
Which reminds me, I actually tried something like that a while ago. You know those chrome extensions that change "Trump" to "Drumph"? That source code is readily available. Basically, it cycles through every element in a web page, searches for "trump" and just replaces it to "drumph". So I tried to change it so it cycles through all the elements, looks for any indicator that the element is a ignored comment, and then sets it to invisible. It's pretty simple code. The issue I had was that I'm not really an HTML programmer, so I couldn't figure out how to tell if the current element was an ignored comment or not. Someone with HTML experience could probably pound that out in an hour or so.
|
Re: new members in politics
2500 minimum, that's insane! LOL I've been here since the beginning (lurked, then joined) and around 10 years ago in a chess move that went horribly wrong a mod removed over half of my post count when I joked about leaving the forum when I hit a certain post count number. That said, even if my post count was reinstated to it's "true" number I still wouldn't qualify under the 2500 minimum rule. Thankfully, only I and the mod (possibly?) know my true post count. It's all moot, considering I rarely go into the Politics forum unless we're talking about Jeffery Epstein. And even rarer that I would ever create a new thread. Just my two cents. Shalom!
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.