![]() |
Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
Yeah, this is starting to grate on my nerves.
|
Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
Not at all a fan of this.
|
Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
Add me to the list of people who really dislike this "feature".
If you gave me an option (premium?) to turn it off, I might cough up the $20. Seems like a good way to sway people to premium. :( |
Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
Another thumbs down for this - genuinely annoying.
Change for the sake of change????. |
Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
I dislike it as well.
|
Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
Originally Posted by Shagrath
(Post 9177805)
If you gave me an option (premium?) to turn it off, I might cough up the $20. Seems like a good way to sway people to premium. :(
|
Incredibly annoying.
|
celebrity nudes - naked celebs - oops celeb
Originally Posted by marty888
(Post 9177816)
Another thumbs down for this - genuinely annoying.
Change for the sake of change????. |
Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
FWIW, I abhor them. At least I have the option to turn the god-awful avatars off.
Why add more clutter? DVDTalk.com used to be so clean and streamlined. Yes, it is still better than 99% of the boards out there, but why take steps backwards? |
Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
I like the idea that was mentioned of right-aligning them so they don't distract from the message body as much. That really might do the trick.
1) You would get the assumed SEO benefit 2) It wouldn't get in the way of the messages 3) It would also still help the poor souls who don't know what thread they are in, but also retain the mildly-used title feature's integrity. It wouldn't be so "out of the way" that it loses its function, but would be placed such that you can easily read the message body without having to scan past the headline. |
Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
Originally Posted by Thor Simpson
(Post 9178351)
I like the idea that was mentioned of right-aligning them so they don't distract from the message body as much. That really might do the trick.
1) You would get the assumed SEO benefit 2) It wouldn't get in the way of the messages 3) It would also still help the poor souls who don't know what thread they are in, but also retain the mildly-used title feature's integrity. It wouldn't be so "out of the way" that it loses its function, but would be placed such that you can easily read the message body without having to scan past the headline. |
I'm always right.
I can see some advantages. So can a few other people, I've noticed.
|
Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
Originally Posted by VinVega
(Post 9178439)
With this kind of compromising attitude, you might not be allowed back in the Politics forum. ;)
|
shit shit shit shit shit
Auto-generated titles are very annoying.
|
Blech!
Originally Posted by Thor Simpson
(Post 9178538)
This is just my trial run at a world peace formula. If this feature is implemented in this fashion, I am one step away from getting CRM and Dr Mabuse to kiss on the lips.
|
Automatic titles in posts fucking rule!!!
Whoever implemented these automatic titles in posts is the coolest.
This shit rocks!!! |
cuckold husband forced to watch wife
Originally Posted by Dr Mabuse
(Post 9178682)
Whoever implemented these automatic titles in posts is the coolest.
This shit rocks!!! |
Automatic titles add to visual clutter and serve no useful purpose.
Really annoying. I hate having to remember to triple click, delete, them every time I post.
No, I don't get the search density stuff. It certainly won't help me in my forum searches and what earthly difference does it make if a thread shows up on Google searches? Huh? |
Embrace the corporate mindset!
I'm sure it promotes positive growth for the bottom line by increasing synergy with corporate sponsors and strategic partners, helping foster mutually beneficial relationships within the internet advertising space. This sort of out-of-the-box thinking is why Internet Brands is known as an industry leader for its best practices, consistent performance, and wide-reaching influence on customers across all demographic groups.
|
Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
Yup. I've got no problems with right alignment. Don't really even notice them :up:
|
C'mon, chemicals! C'mon chemica-a-a-a-als!
Better.
But... my thread about shortest Google word was indexed. If I looked for "Gallery of Unspeakable Sex Acts" (which was a sub-title here), there are no results. |
Re: Embrace the corporate mindset!
Originally Posted by Thor Simpson
(Post 9178351)
I like the idea that was mentioned of right-aligning them so they don't distract from the message body as much. That really might do the trick.
1) You would get the assumed SEO benefit 2) It wouldn't get in the way of the messages 3) It would also still help the poor souls who don't know what thread they are in, but also retain the mildly-used title feature's integrity. It wouldn't be so "out of the way" that it loses its function, but would be placed such that you can easily read the message body without having to scan past the headline. |
Re: C'mon, chemicals! C'mon chemica-a-a-a-als!
Originally Posted by The Bus
(Post 9179133)
Better.
But... my thread about shortest Google word was indexed. If I looked for "Gallery of Unspeakable Sex Acts" (which was a sub-title here), there are no results. |
save 90%%% on watches! visit store! | Settle for nothing less than 9"
Originally Posted by IB-Dick
(Post 9179135)
Well formed argument. I'll go ahead and align them to the right and we'll see how that goes.
|
Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
Oh, must've had the gallery of unspeakable sex acts gallery words in the wrong order. Well, thankfully now it'll be indexed no matter what order they're in. :lol:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:20 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.