![]() |
Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
Pretty annoying. Highly, actually. Some titles are worse than others.
Putting it in a single h1 tag towards the top would be more effective in my opinion than spamming every post with it for keyword reach. The little inline image that you have with alt tag isn't a bad idea either. But it seems like overkill to negatively impact the user experience in the interest of SEO. There are plenty of good alternatives. |
Can they be made not-bold?
And/or hidden as a user option? |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
Originally Posted by whotony
(Post 9176285)
what's different from before?
|
Re: What's with the automatic titties in posts?
Originally Posted by Thor Simpson
(Post 9176394)
But it seems like overkill to negatively impact the user experience in the interest of SEO. There are plenty of good alternatives.
|
Re: Hello, I'm a title!
I have to go with they make the screen too busy. I'd go without them if there was a user CP function to turn them off. That way you can still get your keyword density credits and my eyes won't have to deal with the titles.
|
Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
Yeah, it's hard to know what thread I'm in when I use tabs. :lol:
<img src="http://www.imageadventures.com/other/threadTitles.gif"> |
Re: Hello, I'm a title!
Originally Posted by VinVega
(Post 9176446)
I have to go with they make the screen too busy. I'd go without them if there was a user CP function to turn them off. That way you can still get your keyword density credits and my eyes won't have to deal with the titles.
|
Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
These changes both excite and scare me.
|
Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
I don't like them either. Not a huge deal, but a mild annoyance. The quoted post thing is cool though.
|
Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
Is there anyway the titles can be put in the blue header of the post (and not bolded)? That would be win-win-win. Or can they be in white, so the search engines will see them, but we don't have to?
|
Hipposex hipposex hipposex hippopotamus fetish hippoteenz
I can't find the Sex with Hippos thread. :(
|
Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
Good advice, if you want to get blacklisted by google. ;)
|
Re: Hipposex hipposex hipposex hippopotamus fetish hippoteenz
Originally Posted by The Bus
(Post 9176576)
I can't find the Sex with Hippos thread. :(
|
:lol: @ The Bus
|
The hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius), from the Greek ἱπποπόταμος (hippopotamos
ιππος hippos meaning "horse" and πόταμος potamus meaning "river"), often shortened to "hippo", is a large, mostly plant-eating African mammal, one of only two extant species in the family Hippopotamidae (the other being the Pygmy Hippopotamus). It is the heaviest extant artiodactyl, though quite a bit shorter than the Giraffe.
Originally Posted by mbs
(Post 9176573)
Is there anyway the titles can be put in the blue header of the post (and not bolded)? That would be win-win-win. Or can they be in white, so the search engines will see them, but we don't have to?
Avatars don't really do that since they are way on the left and don't break up the flow of the thread. On the other hand, I think they make it easier to quickly visually identify who is posting something (provided people keep their avatars for a long enough time). |
Re: The hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius), from the Greek ἱπποπόταμος (hippopotam
Originally Posted by The Bus
(Post 9176583)
ιππος hippos
Oh, that's right. |
Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
Add me to the list of those who finds it very annoying, especially when bolded like that.
|
Mesothelomia low rate mortgage personal loans credit cards best online cruise
Why not replace the bolded script with some additional useful keywords, if it's being done for the benefit of Google and search engines and not the users?
|
Re: What's with the automatic titties in posts?
Originally Posted by NoirFan
(Post 9176267)
Add me to the list of those who finds it very annoying, especially when bolded like that.
|
Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
I'm not really bothered by it.
|
dirty hot wet nipples can cause infection on baby bottles (t for teen)
Originally Posted by The Bus
(Post 9176593)
Why not replace the bolded script with some additional useful keywords, if it's being done for the benefit of Google and search engines and not the users?
|
Re: The hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius), from the Greek ἱπποπόταμος (hippopotam
Originally Posted by The Bus
(Post 9176583)
I was just thinking that. Visually, any text breaks up the thread. Signatures are bad enough, but we've trained ourself to go to the blue line and read what's after that. It just makes it visually cluttered. Avatars don't really do that since they are way on the left and don't break up the flow of the thread. On the other hand, I think they make it easier to quickly visually identify who is posting something (provided people keep their avatars for a long enough time). Agree about the Avatars though, i've gotten used to scanning for my Lakers logo to find my post quickly. |
Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
They've finally found something I can't adblock.
|
Yep....
....this is annoying. I'm guessing that I'll still forget to delete it from my posts 90% of the time.
|
Re: What's with the automatic titles in posts?
Originally Posted by The Bus
(Post 9176425)
Repeating the same word/phrase isn't going to help SEO results, I don't think.
Originally Posted by VinVega
(Post 9176446)
I have to go with they make the screen too busy. I'd go without them if there was a user CP function to turn them off. That way you can still get your keyword density credits and my eyes won't have to deal with the titles.
Originally Posted by Thor Simpson
(Post 9176453)
Yeah, it's hard to know what thread I'm in when I use tabs. :lol:
LOL. That was my exact reaction, but I don't consider myself one of those gurus, and there are many users out there that are less savvy than the average bear.
Originally Posted by X
(Post 9176488)
They probably wouldn't be so objectionable if they weren't bolded.
Originally Posted by mbs
(Post 9176573)
Is there anyway the titles can be put in the blue header of the post (and not bolded)? That would be win-win-win. Or can they be in white, so the search engines will see them, but we don't have to?
Originally Posted by The Bus
(Post 9176576)
I can't find the Sex with Hippos thread. :(
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:21 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.