You're going to have to be more specific than that, I'm afraid.

I've only seen them at the first and last of a full page of posts in a thread so I guess it is assuming the default page view.

Ah, good catch. Mine is set to 40 per page.

So that's another flaw with the in post ads as they'll be more annoying to some.

First only seems like a decent compromise if in post ads have to stick around. Annoying, but as X said you only read it once. First and last will cause problems with the number of posts view and having it in the last post is annoying anyway as that is what you click on a thread to read many times.

I was used to the ad between the first and second posts. This actually made me think there was something wrong with my browser. I've never seen an ad inside a post on a forum before.

I suppose I'll get used to it to, but you might want to pass along to the advertisers that I would never be more likely to purchase a product from an ad in a post vs. an ad elsewhere on the page. In fact, I'm less inclined because it feels FAR more intrusive.

Gah!

Another vote for ads BETWEEN posts.

6/5

Ugh. Me no likey. But it's not the end of the world.

would it be possible to bring back the ad between the first and second posts, but keeping the ones in the post as well?

Ads IN threads were a test, too. That never went away. It never really bothered me, though. But these ads do.

Aside from the fact that they make the posts they are placed in harder to read, I really just think they're inappropriate- they cross a line. Posts should never have anything placed in them that the poster didn't put there, unless by moderator action (which is always clearly marked).

yeah another vote for hating them. Maybe if they were rectangle banners at the bottom of the posts and not giant squares that alter the format of the text.

Look at what they did to this post:

http://forum.dvdtalk.com/showpost.ph...4&postcount=51

The word "quote" appears above the ad, making it appear as though the poster put it there.

I just thought of something else.

I am seeing the quote button below the ad.

Must depend on the browser.

Can you explain how this will increase revenue?

I see three of them on the first page of this thread (I have my page view set to 40 posts per page). One in the OP, then one each in posts #25 and #26.

Geoff, you say this every time.

That said, I prefer the ads in the posts <b>provided</b> they are offset in some way so that it is clear they are site advertisements. Otherwise it seems like it is part of my post. Most sites handle this by wrapping ads in a div of a certain color (usually gray) with the words "Advertisement" in some way above the ad.

Like this (floated to the right, of course):

<div style="width: 315px; height: 275px; background-color: #666666; color: #FFFFFF; text-align: center; vertical-align: middle; font-size: 10px"><div style="padding: 3px 0 3px 0">Advertisement</div><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v399/dabrink/banner_300x250.jpg" />
</div>

My guess is that ads inside posts have been shown to have a higher "click through" percentage. This is probably due more to accidental clicks than actual interest.

Of that you can be sure. Which of course means that website design is now about tricking people into generating revenue rather than serving its patrons. Really quite sad.

Indeed. The internet is declining pretty rapidly in general for such reasons IMO. I hardly use it at all at home now...only get on when I want to look up something specific, no more random goofing for the most part.

Random goofing and DVD Talk posting is largely limited to being bored at work these days.

Aargh. Hate it.

If I go see the hoax, will you please get rid of the ads?

I'm also having problems anytime someone is quoting another post and the ad is in the thread. I'm using IE7. The "quote" header is above the post and then the rest of the space is blank where the ad is, and the quote starts underneath the ad.