And STILL we have no option for AVATARS? tsk.
12-09-04 | 03:49 PM
#154
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,755
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: waiting for forum.dvdtalk.com ...
Originally Posted by goLUCKY
Maybe it should be more of a 16x9 ratio.
personally, i prefer no avatars, but their presence would not keep me from coming to the site on a regular basis (especially if i could disable them).
kms
12-09-04 | 08:34 PM
#155
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by Rogue588
And, again, those that do can shut 'em down in the User CP. Now that we have options available to us, don't be so damn lazy.
12-09-04 | 09:06 PM
#156
Originally Posted by SunMonkey
Thank goodness I can turn these off. And what I surprise that I can also turn of signatures. Were we always able to do this?
12-11-04 | 12:03 PM
#161
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 4,899
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: Austin, Texas XboxLIVE Gamertag: Golucky Timezone: Central (CST)
Originally Posted by FinkPish
I found that online the other day, and I think it probably the angriest baby I've ever seen, and funny as hell. Someone had also photoshopped this, which is even funnier:
Funny stuff!
12-15-04 | 07:38 PM
#163
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 6,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JoeyOhhhh
I guess naked women avatars will be out of the question
12-15-04 | 07:40 PM
#164
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 6,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mikewendt
So when are we going to be aloud to add avatars?
12-15-04 | 08:59 PM
#165
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by The Exister
Even worse than brooding anime guy is pig-tailed, panty-showing anime underage chick.
Is it OK if she's real instead of anime?
12-15-04 | 09:03 PM
#166
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Some other forums let members have them after a certain # of posts & the Admin has to approve them first... Just a suggestion.
Oh, and if you wanted to save on server space just have the members host the avatars on free image sites.
Like I said, just throwing that out there... Thanks for the reply.
Oh, and if you wanted to save on server space just have the members host the avatars on free image sites.
Like I said, just throwing that out there... Thanks for the reply.
12-16-04 | 01:39 PM
#167
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: AZ
Originally Posted by mikewendt
Some other forums let members have them after a certain # of posts & the Admin has to approve them first... Just a suggestion.
I like that idea. Sounds more fair to me than just giving them to everyone.
12-16-04 | 06:46 PM
#171
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: 11.5 Miles from the Strip
I somewhat agree with the post count restriction, but think that it needs to go a step further, to prevent the pointless posts done for sole purpose of increasing post count.
The extra step could be minimum post count and minimum membership of one year or so. This stops the pointless post padding and rewards members who have been around a while.
The extra step could be minimum post count and minimum membership of one year or so. This stops the pointless post padding and rewards members who have been around a while.
12-18-04 | 05:24 PM
#172
Originally Posted by LasVegasMichael
I somewhat agree with the post count restriction, but think that it needs to go a step further, to prevent the pointless posts done for sole purpose of increasing post count.
The extra step could be minimum post count and minimum membership of one year or so. This stops the pointless post padding and rewards members who have been around a while.
The extra step could be minimum post count and minimum membership of one year or so. This stops the pointless post padding and rewards members who have been around a while.
12-18-04 | 06:25 PM
#173
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: wishing I was in Vegas
Originally Posted by LasVegasMichael
I somewhat agree with the post count restriction, but think that it needs to go a step further, to prevent the pointless posts done for sole purpose of increasing post count.
The extra step could be minimum post count and minimum membership of one year or so. This stops the pointless post padding and rewards members who have been around a while.
The extra step could be minimum post count and minimum membership of one year or so. This stops the pointless post padding and rewards members who have been around a while.
