What happened to the Michael Moore thread?
#7
Originally posted by Groucho
After a certain number of replies, you shouldn't be able to delete the whole thread. Seems that's too much power for one forum member, especially kvrdave.
After a certain number of replies, you shouldn't be able to delete the whole thread. Seems that's too much power for one forum member, especially kvrdave.
So next time I start a thread and lots of cons make good points over 9 pages, I'll just delete it and act like it never happened.
#8
DVD Talk God
Originally posted by Groucho
After a certain number of replies, you shouldn't be able to delete the whole thread. Seems that's too much power for one forum member, especially kvrdave.
After a certain number of replies, you shouldn't be able to delete the whole thread. Seems that's too much power for one forum member, especially kvrdave.
I got tired of the same old bullshit but also couldn't pull away. I had to leave yesterday and got too far behind, so I was going to start a thread specifically on the Hardy critique and rebuttal, but did anyone give me time? Nooooooooo.
#10
DVD Talk Hero
Originally posted by kvrdave
I got tired of the same old bullshit but also couldn't pull away. I had to leave yesterday and got too far behind, so I was going to start a thread specifically on the Hardy critique and rebuttal, but did anyone give me time? Nooooooooo.
I got tired of the same old bullshit but also couldn't pull away. I had to leave yesterday and got too far behind, so I was going to start a thread specifically on the Hardy critique and rebuttal, but did anyone give me time? Nooooooooo.
#12
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Now in the Mojave desert...but still, thankfully, outside Los Angeles
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyway, what I started to say, before I was so rudely interrupted, was...
The probable reason for lower gun deaths in Canada is most likely due to the types of weapons involved. Handgun ownership is severely restricted. Automatic and semi-automatic weapons are prohibited. Acquisition of non-restricted weapons, like hunting rifles, is the least onerous procedure, but may still require several weeks to complete.
The probable reason for lower gun deaths in Canada is most likely due to the types of weapons involved. Handgun ownership is severely restricted. Automatic and semi-automatic weapons are prohibited. Acquisition of non-restricted weapons, like hunting rifles, is the least onerous procedure, but may still require several weeks to complete.
#14
DVD Talk Hero
Perhaps the first time I've ever disagreed with you on something non-political.
I agree the thread ought never have been started, but a lot of people put a lot of effort into making that thread. It is a frustrating thing to do to them.
I agree the thread ought never have been started, but a lot of people put a lot of effort into making that thread. It is a frustrating thing to do to them.
#17
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 12,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by CRM114
So you just delete all of the work members put it into that thread?
So you just delete all of the work members put it into that thread?
#18
Originally posted by Groucho
Work?
Work?
I guess he didn't like the answers.
#19
DVD Talk God
Yes, yes I did.
And I'd do it again. Muhahahahahhaha.
Honestly, I just got tired of the same old crap. Reading through it, it became obvious that it was going nowhere but where every other thread on MM has gone. Find one of the old threads, reread it, and it is the same.
But let me tell you how it would have turned out. MM defneders would have believed the MM response. MM detractors would have believed the Hardylaw critique. MM defenders would have minimalized the good parts of the critique, and MM detractors would have minimalized the good parts of the MM response.
There....now you all now the ending and can go aobut your days happy that you think you won.
And I'd do it again. Muhahahahahhaha.
Honestly, I just got tired of the same old crap. Reading through it, it became obvious that it was going nowhere but where every other thread on MM has gone. Find one of the old threads, reread it, and it is the same.
But let me tell you how it would have turned out. MM defneders would have believed the MM response. MM detractors would have believed the Hardylaw critique. MM defenders would have minimalized the good parts of the critique, and MM detractors would have minimalized the good parts of the MM response.
There....now you all now the ending and can go aobut your days happy that you think you won.
#20
Moderator
Originally posted by kvrdave
Find one of the old threads, reread it, and it is the same.
Find one of the old threads, reread it, and it is the same.
The real tragedy in all this is that dork never returned on Page 5 as promised.
#21
but dave, you asked for us to address the Hardy thing point by point. Several of us did address the very thing you were begging us to. We asked for you to move on to point 2 (as you requested). Apparently, you weren't comfortable with Hardy being exposed...
#22
DVD Talk Ruler
Originally posted by Groucho
After a certain number of replies, you shouldn't be able to delete the whole thread.
After a certain number of replies, you shouldn't be able to delete the whole thread.
A lot of great points in that thread showing, without a doubt, where Michael Moore intentionally lied.. too bad that's all gone.
#23
DVD Talk God
Originally posted by Bushdog
Perhaps the first time I've ever disagreed with you on something non-political.
Perhaps the first time I've ever disagreed with you on something non-political.
And don't think I've forgotten!!!!
#24
DVD Talk Hero
Originally posted by kvrdave
But let me tell you how it would have turned out. MM defneders would have believed the MM response. MM detractors would have believed the Hardylaw critique. MM defenders would have minimalized the good parts of the critique, and MM detractors would have minimalized the good parts of the MM response.
But let me tell you how it would have turned out. MM defneders would have believed the MM response. MM detractors would have believed the Hardylaw critique. MM defenders would have minimalized the good parts of the critique, and MM detractors would have minimalized the good parts of the MM response.
#25
There....now you all now the ending and can go aobut your days happy that you think you won.