Emotion evocking signatures...can we limit this?
#1
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Thread Starter
Emotion evocking signatures...can we limit this?
What I'm talking about is signatures that are there to state a belief very controversial. One that raises questions of race and creed. I'm speaking specically of a signature that says something like, "Israel needs to kill the Palistinians"
Why why why should that be a signature? That isn't a signature that is a divisive emotionally ladden opinion. In certain contexts that is entirely appropriate but when not said in the context (e.g. "Israel is bombed again" thread) then it has no rational basis.
I know that I could turn off the option to see signatures. But I'm thinking about the hundreds or thousands of other people looking at threads who might take offense to signatures of this nature.
thanks for reading.
Why why why should that be a signature? That isn't a signature that is a divisive emotionally ladden opinion. In certain contexts that is entirely appropriate but when not said in the context (e.g. "Israel is bombed again" thread) then it has no rational basis.
I know that I could turn off the option to see signatures. But I'm thinking about the hundreds or thousands of other people looking at threads who might take offense to signatures of this nature.
thanks for reading.
#3
Mod Emeritus
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Gone to the islands - 'til we meet again.
Posts: 19,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Emotion evocking signatures...can we limit this?
Originally posted by Alyoshka
What I'm talking about is signatures that are there to state a belief very controversial. One that raises questions of race and creed. I'm speaking specically of a signature that says something like, "Israel needs to kill the Palistinians"
Why why why should that be a signature? That isn't a signature that is a divisive emotionally ladden opinion. In certain contexts that is entirely appropriate but when not said in the context (e.g. "Israel is bombed again" thread) then it has no rational basis.
What I'm talking about is signatures that are there to state a belief very controversial. One that raises questions of race and creed. I'm speaking specically of a signature that says something like, "Israel needs to kill the Palistinians"
Why why why should that be a signature? That isn't a signature that is a divisive emotionally ladden opinion. In certain contexts that is entirely appropriate but when not said in the context (e.g. "Israel is bombed again" thread) then it has no rational basis.
Did you actually see this in a signature, or is it just an example?
#4
DVD Talk Hero - 2023 TOTY Award Winner
Yes, some actual examples would be helpful.
Just off the top of my head, I am reluctant to quell anyone's sig unless it is legitimately offensive.
Just off the top of my head, I am reluctant to quell anyone's sig unless it is legitimately offensive.
#5
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Thread Starter
Originally posted by JustinS
Yes, some actual examples would be helpful.
Just off the top of my head, I am reluctant to quell anyone's sig unless it is legitimately offensive.
Yes, some actual examples would be helpful.
Just off the top of my head, I am reluctant to quell anyone's sig unless it is legitimately offensive.