Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Feedback > Forum Feedback and Support
Reload this Page >

Emotion evocking signatures...can we limit this?

Community
Search
Forum Feedback and Support Post forum feedback and related problems, here.

Emotion evocking signatures...can we limit this?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-06-01 | 03:54 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 9,779
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Houston, TX
Emotion evocking signatures...can we limit this?

What I'm talking about is signatures that are there to state a belief very controversial. One that raises questions of race and creed. I'm speaking specically of a signature that says something like, "Israel needs to kill the Palistinians"

Why why why should that be a signature? That isn't a signature that is a divisive emotionally ladden opinion. In certain contexts that is entirely appropriate but when not said in the context (e.g. "Israel is bombed again" thread) then it has no rational basis.

I know that I could turn off the option to see signatures. But I'm thinking about the hundreds or thousands of other people looking at threads who might take offense to signatures of this nature.

thanks for reading.
Old 12-06-01 | 05:39 AM
  #2  
Groucho's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 71,383
Received 130 Likes on 92 Posts
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
This is the main reason that I turned off sigs in my options. That, and the movie quotes that go on for 15 lines (often longer than the actual post).
Old 12-06-01 | 08:01 AM
  #3  
Mod Emeritus
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 19,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Gone to the islands - 'til we meet again.
Re: Emotion evocking signatures...can we limit this?

Originally posted by Alyoshka
What I'm talking about is signatures that are there to state a belief very controversial. One that raises questions of race and creed. I'm speaking specically of a signature that says something like, "Israel needs to kill the Palistinians"

Why why why should that be a signature? That isn't a signature that is a divisive emotionally ladden opinion. In certain contexts that is entirely appropriate but when not said in the context (e.g. "Israel is bombed again" thread) then it has no rational basis.

Did you actually see this in a signature, or is it just an example?
Old 12-06-01 | 09:46 AM
  #4  
jfoobar's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero - 2023 TOTY Award Winner
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 51,061
Received 4,262 Likes on 2,339 Posts
Yes, some actual examples would be helpful.

Just off the top of my head, I am reluctant to quell anyone's sig unless it is legitimately offensive.
Old 12-06-01 | 01:27 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 9,779
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Houston, TX
Originally posted by JustinS
Yes, some actual examples would be helpful.

Just off the top of my head, I am reluctant to quell anyone's sig unless it is legitimately offensive.
I'll email you the one of which I speak, so I'm not publically calling people out.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.