5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
#176
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
I'm with BobO'Link, I'd say about 95% of my watches are alone. Not many people I know watch as many movies as I do, for one, and for another, they have a lot different tastes-mainly action/adventure/explode 'em all's only. I like those films, don't get me wrong, but I also watch a lot of sci fi/fantasy, animation, TV, foreign films... most of those hold no interest (especially the foreign ones-subtitles, ew!).
I watch M today. I did like this one. I'm going to put most of the review into a spoiler so I don't have to watch what I say, though...
I do have a question about subtitles. First, I want to say, I am all for them. I prefer to watch a movie with them then with a dub. However, for M, I kind of wish there was a dub (I think I read there was an English one, but it was lost?) available. The speaking is fast and the subtitles fade quickly. This isn't a problem reading-wise, I'm not missing words, but when I want to watch what is going on on the screen, it makes it hard to focus on it. You're concentration is on the words, not the actions. Anyone else run into this?
I watch M today. I did like this one. I'm going to put most of the review into a spoiler so I don't have to watch what I say, though...
Spoiler:
I do have a question about subtitles. First, I want to say, I am all for them. I prefer to watch a movie with them then with a dub. However, for M, I kind of wish there was a dub (I think I read there was an English one, but it was lost?) available. The speaking is fast and the subtitles fade quickly. This isn't a problem reading-wise, I'm not missing words, but when I want to watch what is going on on the screen, it makes it hard to focus on it. You're concentration is on the words, not the actions. Anyone else run into this?
#177
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Also: The only Theme for which it is listed is Cuts - which is an assortment of movies where Criterion has included a lot of deleted scenes. The spirit-of-the-law-not-the-letter-of-the-law arguer in me thinks that we should only be able to count a movie for the Cuts theme if we actually watch that deleted content. As the Amazon stream is just the film, I would feel it inappropriate to mark off that theme for this movie. I know we also have a similar stipulation for the Compare and Contrast theme.
I just finished watching YI YI, my first of the Challenge. It was very long, but at about ten minutes in I realized that I was gonna be okay with the length. What a great film! I'd love to give an articulate, analytical response to it, but right now I'm too overwhelmed by it to sort out my thoughts in any coherent manner.
I think that Criterion films are the only films/shows presented commercial-free. IIRC, that was one of the deals with them moving to Hulu.
#178
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
I just finished watching my fourth film of the challenge, The Face of Another. Had I given this any planning, I would have probably not watched the prior two films in the Teshigahara boxset previously and could have used this as my boxset. Oh well, that can't be helped now. All three were fantastic and are on Hulu Plus for anyone who hasn't seen them and has access to that service.
People taking on another face or persona after being disfigured is a fairly common theme, but this was probably my favorite use of that idea. It brings up a lot of questions about one's identity and how one's personality and behavior can be changed by physical changes in appearance. I won't go into spoilers, but it is a great character study of how all this affects the main character.
People taking on another face or persona after being disfigured is a fairly common theme, but this was probably my favorite use of that idea. It brings up a lot of questions about one's identity and how one's personality and behavior can be changed by physical changes in appearance. I won't go into spoilers, but it is a great character study of how all this affects the main character.
#179
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Yeppers! Here's what I had to say last year about Gimme Shelter, which I consumed in two settings. Titles link to my Letterboxd diary entries.
Feature and Bonus Content
Commentary Track and Essays
Feature and Bonus Content
Commentary Track and Essays
This morning I watch In the Mood for Love (2000) while my family was attending church. Closed all the curtains and had a nice time watching it in that “just woke up with nothing to do” euphoria. It’s the second film I’ve seen by director Wong Kar-wai. I watched Chungking Express for last year’s challenge (was surprised to see that the Criterion BD is OOP) and enjoyed it, though it was overly quirky at a time when I didn’t want quirk in my films. This film is more my speed: meditative and stylish. I’ve felt like I’m on a cloud since watching.
The film presents such a compelling sense of romance and intimacy. Much of the information about the film’s characters and their relationships remains largely unspoken. The sets and costumes are stunningly beautiful. As with Sweet Smell of Success, I wanted to live in the world the film presents, and I would survive much better in it. The central characters actions and reactions reminded me of the myself in college when I would fall into a deep, unspoken love for another guy. There is a scene where Maggie Cheung Man-yuk silently weeps, and I found myself weeping with her.
Several reviewers on Amazon insisted that the deleted scenes ruin the experience of the film. However, I found it really interesting to see how the film could have developed into something completely different in both story and sensibility. I will say that I cannot imagine working with Wong Kar-Wai who apparently often shoots without a formalized script and does not seem to articulate what he wants to the actors. That work ethic and style must create a lot of frustration. However, the end product is definitely brilliant. Based on my reaction to the film, I’ve already ordered a couple of his other films from my local library.
The film presents such a compelling sense of romance and intimacy. Much of the information about the film’s characters and their relationships remains largely unspoken. The sets and costumes are stunningly beautiful. As with Sweet Smell of Success, I wanted to live in the world the film presents, and I would survive much better in it. The central characters actions and reactions reminded me of the myself in college when I would fall into a deep, unspoken love for another guy. There is a scene where Maggie Cheung Man-yuk silently weeps, and I found myself weeping with her.
Several reviewers on Amazon insisted that the deleted scenes ruin the experience of the film. However, I found it really interesting to see how the film could have developed into something completely different in both story and sensibility. I will say that I cannot imagine working with Wong Kar-Wai who apparently often shoots without a formalized script and does not seem to articulate what he wants to the actors. That work ethic and style must create a lot of frustration. However, the end product is definitely brilliant. Based on my reaction to the film, I’ve already ordered a couple of his other films from my local library.
For those with Amazon Prime, I offer this list of films I've just created for myself of applicable titles:
Blood for Dracula
Flesh for Frankenstein
The Killing
Quadrophenia
Pulp Fiction
My Man Godfrey
Dr. Strangelove
Certified Copy
Citizen Kane
Spinal Tap
Things to Come
A Canterbury Tale [Powell/Pressburger]
Une Femme est Une Femme
Decameron
Canterbury Tales [Pasolini]
Tiny Furniture
Emperor Jones
Casablanca
Cul-de-Sac
Che 1
Che 2
Night Train to Munich
Crumb
Days of Heaven
Singin' in the Rain remains to my mind one of the best films ever made. It rings true, it has superb performances in all the main (and supporting roles), there are good songs well-used, phenomenal dance numbers and a surprisingly realistic and touching love story at the centre of it all.
Blood for Dracula
Flesh for Frankenstein
The Killing
Quadrophenia
Pulp Fiction
My Man Godfrey
Dr. Strangelove
Certified Copy
Citizen Kane
Spinal Tap
Things to Come
A Canterbury Tale [Powell/Pressburger]
Une Femme est Une Femme
Decameron
Canterbury Tales [Pasolini]
Tiny Furniture
Emperor Jones
Casablanca
Cul-de-Sac
Che 1
Che 2
Night Train to Munich
Crumb
Days of Heaven
Singin' in the Rain remains to my mind one of the best films ever made. It rings true, it has superb performances in all the main (and supporting roles), there are good songs well-used, phenomenal dance numbers and a surprisingly realistic and touching love story at the centre of it all.
As a general rule, I dislike musicals. For me, Singin' in the Rain transcends any of that criticism. A great film about film.
FOLLOW-UP:
From Criterion's news page: "Ingmar Bergman’s masterpiece Persona has just joined our ever expanding Hulu channel..."
From Criterion's news page: "Ingmar Bergman’s masterpiece Persona has just joined our ever expanding Hulu channel..."
I need to see IN THE MOOD FOR LOVE again. Not sure whether that's my favorite Wong Kar Wai film or ASHES OF TIME. I'd need to see both again.
As for your comment about wanting to live in the world the film represents, I daresay that Manhattan in 1957 (SWEET SMELL OF SUCCESS) was a much easier place to live in, J.J. Hunsecker notwithstanding, than Hong Kong in 1962 (IN THE MOOD FOR LOVE). A young person just arriving in New York could much more easily get a cheap apartment --even near Times Square--than they could in Hong Kong at the time. Of course, the idea of doubling up in a cramped apartment with Maggie Cheung (or Tony Leung, if you'd prefer) could be very appealing.
As for your comment about wanting to live in the world the film represents, I daresay that Manhattan in 1957 (SWEET SMELL OF SUCCESS) was a much easier place to live in, J.J. Hunsecker notwithstanding, than Hong Kong in 1962 (IN THE MOOD FOR LOVE). A young person just arriving in New York could much more easily get a cheap apartment --even near Times Square--than they could in Hong Kong at the time. Of course, the idea of doubling up in a cramped apartment with Maggie Cheung (or Tony Leung, if you'd prefer) could be very appealing.

#180
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Not trying to hijack the thread but I have a question: do you watch your films alone or with others? I just watched one of the Ozu's Tokyo Chorus and my family was really distracting. They don't do well with silent films. Now I'm watching Slacker in my room... alone. Just wondering if others deal with similar situations.
Quite honestly, with the exception of my weekly movie night with select friends, I prefer to watch films alone. I have found that most people I know do not have the attention span for the types of films I enjoy. This is not always the case, but more often than not I watch films with only the cats. 

If I can help it, I never watch a film for the first time with more than one other person. It pains me when I see someone on Facebook announce they're going to finally watch a movie for the first time and then ten minutes later they're posting status updates about how interesting/boring/whatever it is. Such people are certain they're processing everything just fine, but I cannot believe it. I don't agree with David Fincher about the size of a screen ruining a viewer's ability to absorb a film, but I do believe that divided attention does ruin it - regardless of screen size. An attentive viewer watching on a phone is going to glean more than someone in a movie theater paying more attention to concessions and chatting with their buddies.
I've also found since I began my foray into The Criterion Collection (and from there, silent films, foreign flicks, art house fare and the like in general) that I focus better and enjoy them more later at night. I don't generally do well with daytime viewings. It's a psychological barrier of some kind, I think.
I've also found since I began my foray into The Criterion Collection (and from there, silent films, foreign flicks, art house fare and the like in general) that I focus better and enjoy them more later at night. I don't generally do well with daytime viewings. It's a psychological barrier of some kind, I think.
I can remember with great clarity the time of day that I have seen many films that I loved. Work and personal life means that I usually end up watching a film either in the middle of the day or late at night. I don't necessarily have a preference, either works for me...it's more a difficulty of finding a 2-hour stretch of time for uninterrupted viewing.
#181
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Last October, my friends and I went to see a double feature of Frankenstein (1931) and Bride of Frankenstein (1935). During the intermission, we talked about how the only music in Frankenstein was over the opening credits. They were aware there wasn't much music, but hadn't quite realized that it was so absolute. When Bride was over, we chatted about how that single double feature of two films only four years apart represented such a perfect microcosm of the evolution of film-making. Pretty striking, really!
...I'm not missing words, but when I want to watch what is going on on the screen, it makes it hard to focus on it. You're concentration is on the words, not the actions. Anyone else run into this?
I distinctly remember in 2010, when I watched Smiles of a Summer Night for this challenge, at one point I had to pause it for one of my ubiquitous bathroom breaks. It wasn't until I returned and resumed the movie that I even registered that it was subtitled, because I had already acclimated so well to the format.
I just finished watching my fourth film of the challenge, The Face of Another. Had I given this any planning, I would have probably not watched the prior two films in the Teshigahara boxset previously and could have used this as my boxset. Oh well, that can't be helped now.
(It's on my wish list to one day get to pen an essay for Criterion.)
#182
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
I find that the more subbed movies I watch at a time, the better I get about processing both text and screen imagery. Yesterday, I hung out with a friend who had never seen Amelie. It was her first foreign film ever, so she felt that she missed quite a lot by either losing too much time to reading the subtitles or being so caught up studying what was on the screen that she forgot to read them in time.
I distinctly remember in 2010, when I watched Smiles of a Summer Night for this challenge, at one point I had to pause it for one of my ubiquitous bathroom breaks. It wasn't until I returned and resumed the movie that I even registered that it was subtitled, because I had already acclimated so well to the format.
I distinctly remember in 2010, when I watched Smiles of a Summer Night for this challenge, at one point I had to pause it for one of my ubiquitous bathroom breaks. It wasn't until I returned and resumed the movie that I even registered that it was subtitled, because I had already acclimated so well to the format.

But, Travis, I've said this before, I think your reviews are very well done and I really enjoy reading them. I might not always agree, but I always think about what you've written!
#183
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
It actually makes a pretty good double-feature with the first film I watched for the Challenge, Yi Yi, in that they're both meditations on what it means to be human.
On a purely aesthetic note, I don't think that I'm going to see a finer final shot this challenge than that of Revanche (even with The 400 Blows on my "to be watched" list).
#184
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
I'll also echo the Revanche love. Blown away by that one.
#185
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Also, ditto what everyone else is saying about Travis's reviews! I really enjoy reading them as well.
#186
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
The Hidden Fortress (1958) is pure, exhilarating fun from start to finish. I watched it Sunday evening while the rest of my family was attending church. My experiences with Kurosawa have been with his more ponderous films, so this was a change of pace. I’m not sure I have much to say about it (or George Lucas’s interview). Kurosawa and cinematographer Ichio Yamazaki make good use of the Tohoscope and the space outside of the screen. There are lots of fun long shots with characters reacting to off-screen stimuli right before it invades the screen.
Unfortunately, not all of the film’s elements worked for me. I’m going to put Tahei and Matashichi (the two peasants) up there with The Fifth Element’s Ruby Rhod in the “Annoying Comic Relief” category. God, they were fucking annoying. I would have much rather seen things from the viewpoint of Toshiro Mifune’s character. The fact that he does not throttle those two is just as impressive as his spear-play with Hyoe Tadokoro. Thankfully, the film is delightful enough that I found other things on which to focus.
Oh, and Toshiro Mifune’s thighs are absolutely amazing… as are Misa Uehara’s eyebrows!
Unfortunately, not all of the film’s elements worked for me. I’m going to put Tahei and Matashichi (the two peasants) up there with The Fifth Element’s Ruby Rhod in the “Annoying Comic Relief” category. God, they were fucking annoying. I would have much rather seen things from the viewpoint of Toshiro Mifune’s character. The fact that he does not throttle those two is just as impressive as his spear-play with Hyoe Tadokoro. Thankfully, the film is delightful enough that I found other things on which to focus.
Oh, and Toshiro Mifune’s thighs are absolutely amazing… as are Misa Uehara’s eyebrows!
#187
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread

I found them okay-to-tedious, right up to the point where they were trying to decide which of them got the first crack at sexually assaulting the princess. At that point, they joined Ike Clanton in Tombstone in the shortlist of movie characters I really wanted to see suffer.
#188
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
I streamed The Killing, one of the titles available through Amazon Prime right now. From my Letterboxd diary:
The Killing
-X- 1950 (1956)
-X- 551-600 (#575)
-X- Language: English
-X- Theme: Heist Movies
-X- Theme: Noir and Neonoir
-X- Essay: The Killing by David Ehrenstein
1/10 List: Frank Roddam's Top 10
Spoiler:
The Killing
-X- 1950 (1956)
-X- 551-600 (#575)
-X- Language: English
-X- Theme: Heist Movies
-X- Theme: Noir and Neonoir
-X- Essay: The Killing by David Ehrenstein
1/10 List: Frank Roddam's Top 10
#189
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Since reading that Criterion released a handful of TV episodes on laserdisc, it's been my hope that at some point they'll produce a small companion line of TV shows - particularly complete releases of the drama shows excerpted on Golden Age of TV - so I would hope for that, too.
#190
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Not trying to hijack the thread but I have a question: do you watch your films alone or with others? I just watched one of the Ozu's Tokyo Chorus and my family was really distracting. They don't do well with silent films. Now I'm watching Slacker in my room... alone. Just wondering if others deal with similar situations.
*and frequently fail
#191
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
For the interested, it looks like YouTube has Nanook of the North (#33), The Passion of Joan of Arc (#62), Carnival of Souls (#63), Hiroshima Mon Amour (#196), The Great Dictator (#565), The Phantom Carriage (#579) and The Gold Rush (#615) available for free...
Last edited by ntnon; 09-03-13 at 03:51 AM.
#192
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
After a couple foreign language selections, I thought I'd watch something a little easier last night and went with the very first Criterion I ever owned, or saw for that matter, The Royal Tenenbaums. I guess I purchased it used from a video store (didn't remember that) and was disappointed last night to find out I do not have the booklet.
Anyway, as mentioned, this was my first (of what has become many) Criterion titles, and my first experience with Wes Anderson. It has, as so many of his movies do, so many aspects to it. I think most would call it a comedy, but it is also so tragic yet heartwarming. Now I'm trying to decide whether I prefer it to Rushmore. I guess I'll have to watch that again this month to compare.
To derail a bit here, it is very disappointing how expensive Criterion titles continue to be here in Canada. I'm quite sure the prices are close to double what they are in the US. Usually these days most regular disc prices are on par, but Criterion's still sell for much more than the prices I see south of the border. For instance, HMV sells most blu-rays for around $45. My collection would be even huger otherwise. Maybe that's a good thing actually...
Anyway, as mentioned, this was my first (of what has become many) Criterion titles, and my first experience with Wes Anderson. It has, as so many of his movies do, so many aspects to it. I think most would call it a comedy, but it is also so tragic yet heartwarming. Now I'm trying to decide whether I prefer it to Rushmore. I guess I'll have to watch that again this month to compare.
To derail a bit here, it is very disappointing how expensive Criterion titles continue to be here in Canada. I'm quite sure the prices are close to double what they are in the US. Usually these days most regular disc prices are on par, but Criterion's still sell for much more than the prices I see south of the border. For instance, HMV sells most blu-rays for around $45. My collection would be even huger otherwise. Maybe that's a good thing actually...
#193
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
My night/morning have pretty well sucked, but at least I've gotten in another movie, The Friends of Eddie Coyle. From my Letterboxd diary:
The Friends of Eddie Coyle
-X- 1970 (1973)
-X- #451-500 (#475)
-X- Language: English
-X- Theme: Heist Movies
-X- Theme: New American Cinema
-X- Theme: Noir and Neonoir
-X- Theme: Novels on the Big Screen
-X- Essay: The Friends of Eddie Coyle: They Were Expendable by Kent Jones
1/10 List: Anthony Bourdain's Top 10
Spoiler:
The Friends of Eddie Coyle
-X- 1970 (1973)
-X- #451-500 (#475)
-X- Language: English
-X- Theme: Heist Movies
-X- Theme: New American Cinema
-X- Theme: Noir and Neonoir
-X- Theme: Novels on the Big Screen
-X- Essay: The Friends of Eddie Coyle: They Were Expendable by Kent Jones
1/10 List: Anthony Bourdain's Top 10
Last edited by Travis McClain; 09-03-13 at 09:27 AM.
#194
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Watched my very first Criterion I ever owned last night, Robocop. I bought it used a few years ago and forgot that the disc was pretty scratched, so it wasn't a pleasant viewing experience. In fact, I'm not even going to try to watch the extras.
#195
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Whoops! Forgot to actually reply to pacaway, so here's a follow-up:
Send an email to Jon Mulvaney at Criterion and explain that you'd like to replace the booklet. He may not oblige, but he might. He was kind enough to send a replacement booklet to my local library branch last year when I checked out Gimme Shelter and discovered its booklet absent.
#196
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
I'd normally agree, but I think that this one just really wasn't paced well, subtitle wise. Maybe I just haven't watched a fast paced dialogued movie with subtitles. Up until this movie, I'd say I was pretty good at following both the subtitles and the actual movie. I'm a fast reader, so I never really had problems keeping up with them. But this one just didn't have time to flick your eyes up from the bottom of the screen. I know I reversed twice to catch dialogue because I took my eyes of the subtitles to actually see the picture. And I never do that! 

I just finished watching Revanche, and I have to agree that it's both underrated and a welcome addition to the revenge film genre. It's a very sensual film as well, and the sound design was absolutely top-notch.
It actually makes a pretty good double-feature with the first film I watched for the Challenge, Yi Yi, in that they're both meditations on what it means to be human.
On a purely aesthetic note, I don't think that I'm going to see a finer final shot this challenge than that of Revanche (even with The 400 Blows on my "to be watched" list).
It actually makes a pretty good double-feature with the first film I watched for the Challenge, Yi Yi, in that they're both meditations on what it means to be human.
On a purely aesthetic note, I don't think that I'm going to see a finer final shot this challenge than that of Revanche (even with The 400 Blows on my "to be watched" list).
,
Also, with regards to The Royal Tenenbaums, I can't listen to any version of "Hey Jude"
Spoiler:
To derail a bit here, it is very disappointing how expensive Criterion titles continue to be here in Canada. I'm quite sure the prices are close to double what they are in the US. Usually these days most regular disc prices are on par, but Criterion's still sell for much more than the prices I see south of the border. For instance, HMV sells most blu-rays for around $45. My collection would be even huger otherwise. Maybe that's a good thing actually... 

#197
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Not strictly challenge-related, but TCM started showing a 15-part documentary on the history of film called, aptly enough, The Story of Film. After each episode, TCM is showing films from the period under discussion, which will include a raft of Criterion films, like The Phantom Carriage, L'Atalante, The Passion of Joan of Arc, Safety Last, I Was Born, But. . . , Osaka Elegy, Good Morning,, and many more. I found the first episode fascinating, and I plan to watch the entire series.
Last edited by Gobear; 09-03-13 at 10:49 AM.
#198
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Is there a reason for this (like VAT in the UK?) or are Criterion's significantly higher than other films in Canada? I was fairly unaware of this, although I have heard of people driving/flying(!) to the US for the B&N sale because it's cheaper than buying domestically.
#199
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Whoops! Forgot to actually reply to pacaway, so here's a follow-up:
Send an email to Jon Mulvaney at Criterion and explain that you'd like to replace the booklet. He may not oblige, but he might. He was kind enough to send a replacement booklet to my local library branch last year when I checked out Gimme Shelter and discovered its booklet absent.
Send an email to Jon Mulvaney at Criterion and explain that you'd like to replace the booklet. He may not oblige, but he might. He was kind enough to send a replacement booklet to my local library branch last year when I checked out Gimme Shelter and discovered its booklet absent.
#200
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
My night/morning have pretty well sucked, but at least I've gotten in another movie, The Friends of Eddie Coyle. From my Letterboxd diary:
The Friends of Eddie Coyle
-X- 1970 (1973)
-X- #451-500 (#475)
-X- Language: English
-X- Theme: Heist Movies
-X- Theme: New American Cinema
-X- Theme: Noir and Neonoir
-X- Theme: Novels on the Big Screen
-X- Essay: The Friends of Eddie Coyle: They Were Expendable by Kent Jones
1/10 List: Anthony Bourdain's Top 10
The Friends of Eddie Coyle
-X- 1970 (1973)
-X- #451-500 (#475)
-X- Language: English
-X- Theme: Heist Movies
-X- Theme: New American Cinema
-X- Theme: Noir and Neonoir
-X- Theme: Novels on the Big Screen
-X- Essay: The Friends of Eddie Coyle: They Were Expendable by Kent Jones
1/10 List: Anthony Bourdain's Top 10
I'm not sure if any other Mitchum films are in the Criterion Collection (NIGHT OF THE HUNTER?), but you can't go wrong seeking out more Mitchum films.
I'd also recommend the novel, "The Friends of Eddie Coyle," by George V. Higgins, an ex-prosecutor in Boston, so he came to his writing with a solid background in his subject. Very tight, concise prose style, filled with Boston flavor. Not a wasted stroke.



