![]() |
Re: What's the reason for not switching to Blu?
Originally Posted by madcougar
(Post 10811676)
You have something better to do?
|
Re: What's the reason for not switching to Blu?
Originally Posted by kintnerboy
(Post 10811385)
OR, if you would like to actually be honest, that's par for the course for the biggest new release dvds of the week.
Off the top of my head, some recent & upcoming SD-only releases: The Baby & Bloody Birthday (Severin) Duck Soup & the rest of the 4 Marx Bros (Universal) Takashi Miike's Dead or Alive (Discotek) Gargoyles (Henstooth) MST3K Volumes XX & XXI (Shout Factory) Nightmare: 30th Anniversary (Code Red) Strip-Tease [1962] (Mondo Macabro) The Witchmaker (Code Red) There's a whole world of SD cinema out there. |
Re: What's the reason for not switching to Blu?
Originally Posted by Living Deadpan
(Post 10811807)
There's a whole world of SD cinema out there.
|
Re: What's the reason for not switching to Blu?
Originally Posted by bboisvert
(Post 10811950)
Agreed. Which is why I buy movies, not formats. I still buy DVDs, even with a BD player. Best of both worlds and all of that...
(I still view regional encoding as a worse culprit than formatting. Would anyone mind giving me an estimate of how much a region-free Blu-ray player would cost? I don't feel like doing the tech research. Suffice it to say, I'm on a budget. I don't care about snazzy apps, just something a bit better than defective junk. Reliable & simple. Thank you.) |
Re: What's the reason for not switching to Blu?
Originally Posted by kintnerboy
(Post 10811385)
OR, if you would like to actually be honest, that's par for the course for the biggest new release dvds of the week.
Try buying something more obscure, and you'll find a tremendous price difference: Most major new releases on Blu-ray are priced competitively with their DVD counterparts and frequently (depending upon studio) come with both formats. In the instances where this is not the case and you don't want to pay the price difference, a Blu-ray player will also play DVDs. Options are a wonderful thing. Honest enough for you kinterboy? Nice try, though.
Originally Posted by kd5
(Post 10811462)
I should've added that my TV is only capable of 1080i and no component cables (no matter what they're made of) will squeeze 1080p out of 1080i. -kd5-
Originally Posted by Living Deadpan
(Post 10811807)
There's a whole world of SD cinema out there.
|
Re: What's the reason for not switching to Blu?
Originally Posted by Mr. Salty
(Post 10812710)
Component cables are perfectly capable of 1080p, but the specs for HD formats (HD DVD included) don't permit it. But you're aware, aren't you, that 1080i is still "full HD" and is the format used by most broadcast networks? Most people will be unable to distinguish between 1080i and 1080p, and a Blu-ray player hooked up via component will still look fantastic.
|
Re: What's the reason for not switching to Blu?
If I was reading what you two were talking about, you were talking about the cables, Mr. Salty commented on what you said about the cables and you are now talking about the TV.
But he's right. 1080i still looks pretty damn good when I watch it cable channels. And my DVDs do look better when played on my blu-ray player. Does it look as good as full HD? No. But it's damn better than straight SD. Maybe my Panasonic player does a very good job of upconverting. |
Re: What's the reason for not switching to Blu?
Originally Posted by kd5
(Post 10812748)
I've been told that a Blu-Ray player might make my DVDs (don't own any Blu-Ray discs) look better, but I've also been told that I'll never get 1080p (Blu-Ray standard) out of a 1080i TV with no HDMI, consequently what you've said conflicts with everything I've been told up to this point. So, I trust you'll forgive me if I don't believe everything that everybody tells me. -kd5-
|
Re: What's the reason for not switching to Blu?
Originally Posted by wm lopez
(Post 10810971)
I like old movies and all the movies that came out from 2000 seem to have this green,teal and yellow tint. So I'm not paying for that.
Also the old movies although they may look better don't have the feel of film like when I saw them at the theater. I'll stick with dvd with the price being just right. |
Re: What's the reason for not switching to Blu?
Originally Posted by Spottedfeather
(Post 10813443)
What movies have this tinting you're talking about ? Other than Matrix, I can't think of any strangely tinted movie out lately.
http://img855.imageshack.us/img855/5949/59s194.jpg |
Re: What's the reason for not switching to Blu?
Originally Posted by Mondo Kane
(Post 10813454)
I don't know about the other colors, but every frickin' recent horror movie can't be complete without some green.
http://img855.imageshack.us/img855/5949/59s194.jpg What I like even less than florescent greens is that saturated blue lighting that's used to simulate night time. I don't want to pick on Guillermo Del Toro, but he's a director that comes to mind when I think of overly blue palettes: http://www.shockya.com/news/wp-conte...apien_blue.jpg And I recall Matrix Revolutions having some really ugly blue lighting. Give me the green of the first one any day over those endless blue shots of CGI machines fighting CGI machines. :brickwl2: |
Re: What's the reason for not switching to Blu?
It was a wm lopez comment--it wasn't supposed to make sense.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:51 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.