Saw IV: Unrated or Rated---January 22, 2008
#51
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Julie Walker
Well sometimes there are slight non-gore changes made between the versions. So if someone liked this one moment that was omitted from the UR version. They would have to seek out the R version to see it. And I hear there is one such omission in Saw 4.
So you can't be 100% "UR is better automatically,no questions asked". Just like you can't be "Directors Cut is automatically better". Look at the Saw 3 DC which changes/extends the ending. And most people feel it's the least effective of the three versions of the film.
So you can't be 100% "UR is better automatically,no questions asked". Just like you can't be "Directors Cut is automatically better". Look at the Saw 3 DC which changes/extends the ending. And most people feel it's the least effective of the three versions of the film.
#52
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
I have'nt seen Saw 4 yet either. I could catch a 9pm showing in the doller theater,since tonight is the last night it's playing. But I have other funner plans tonight. And also it'd be cheaper to just rent the film and save gas from not having to drive so far to the theater. And since I don't rent to much. I'll see it,when I see it and am in no hurry to. But this will be the first Saw I didn't see theatrically.
I do think with the prices of the dvds though and not being rich,nor an extreme completist. It's a waste of money for me to buy more than one copy/version of a film(& I only own the first film so far). But in a few select cases. I did find some old horror flicks in R form on VHS for dirt cheap, which is nice to have for comparisions sake. But I wouldn't want to own every film that has an alt version. It takes up to much space, and I'd never watch the other version that much anyway.
I do think with the prices of the dvds though and not being rich,nor an extreme completist. It's a waste of money for me to buy more than one copy/version of a film(& I only own the first film so far). But in a few select cases. I did find some old horror flicks in R form on VHS for dirt cheap, which is nice to have for comparisions sake. But I wouldn't want to own every film that has an alt version. It takes up to much space, and I'd never watch the other version that much anyway.
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Julie Walker
I do think with the prices of the dvds though and not being rich,nor an extreme completist. It's a waste of money for me to buy more than one copy/version of a film(& I only own the first film so far). But in a few select cases. I did find some old horror flicks in R form on VHS for dirt cheap, which is nice to have for comparisions sake. But I wouldn't want to own every film that has an alt version. It takes up to much space, and I'd never watch the other version that much anyway.
#54
DVD Talk God
Thread Starter
I bought the DVD from Circuit City on Tuesday and noticed the disc was upside down. Was it suppose to be that way because of the mini Saw insert/Collectible film cell?
#55
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 5,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DJariya
I bought the DVD from Circuit City on Tuesday and noticed the disc was upside down. Was it suppose to be that way because of the mini Saw insert/Collectible film cell?
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rammsteinfan
It is upside down so it shows thru the front of the cover.
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by crs
It could just as well have been lying the correct way, if they hadn't included any inlay material the disc art would be visible from front of the see-through case. That's how they did it with the previous Saw releases.