Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD Talk
Reload this Page >

Alexander Extended Edition Rumor

Community
Search
DVD Talk Talk about DVDs and Movies on DVD including Covers and Cases

Alexander Extended Edition Rumor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-06 | 03:11 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Chicago
Still haven't seen it.
Old 08-07-06 | 03:23 PM
  #27  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Chicago
No thanks. I saw it once. Once was definitely enough.
Old 08-07-06 | 03:56 PM
  #28  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: knoxville, tn
I haven't seen it, and that was enough for me too.
Old 08-07-06 | 04:10 PM
  #29  
Josh Z's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,962
Received 350 Likes on 243 Posts
From: Boston
Now that we've gotten all of the "This movie sux dood!!!!!" threadcrapping out of the way, can we try to focus on the details of the DVD itself? That would be nice.
Old 08-07-06 | 05:04 PM
  #30  
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Springfield, Mo. - USA
Well, I've seen it fifteen times and certain scenes up to thirty times! It looks
like this forum is full of less than steller film fans. Oh, well! I greatly enjoyed
the 'gay' remark above. That was sure intelligent. I can't imagine what sort
of films you guys like. Although, I'd bet the horrid 'Million $ Baby' and the
awful 'Mystic River' would be up there. How typical!

Stone has been quoted as saying they'll be an intermission apart of the new
cut, and it'll be 3 hrs. and 40-45 mins. Other than that, nothing much else
has been said thus far. Stone won't finish the new cut for another two
months. So, I doubt we'll hear anything until that has been completed.
Old 08-07-06 | 05:21 PM
  #31  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hope there is a longer scene time where Rosario Dawson took off her clothes
Old 08-07-06 | 05:30 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It looks
like this forum is full of less than steller film fans.
Ladies and gentleman, we've graduated from threadcrap to boardcrap.
Old 08-07-06 | 06:15 PM
  #33  
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Springfield, Mo. - USA
Originally Posted by jake_spade
I hope there is a longer scene time where Rosario Dawson took off her clothes
More power to you, but I'll be looking for more of Mr. Farrell with his clothes
off.
Old 08-07-06 | 10:27 PM
  #34  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,737
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Texas
If Stone does, in fact, re-do Alexander on DVD, one thing: DON'T BE COY AND DICK AROUND ABOUT HIS SEXUALITY.

I have a friend who loves Colin Farrell and wanted to love Alexander, but she walked out of a free screening two hours in because the movie was pissing her off. The first thing she said about it, "If you're going to do a movie about Alexander the Great and cover his bisexuality, don't be coy. Just come out and show it."
Old 08-08-06 | 01:25 AM
  #35  
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Springfield, Mo. - USA
Originally Posted by ReduxGuy
If Stone does, in fact, re-do Alexander on DVD, one thing: DON'T BE COY AND DICK AROUND ABOUT HIS SEXUALITY.

I have a friend who loves Colin Farrell and wanted to love Alexander, but she walked out of a free screening two hours in because the movie was pissing her off. The first thing she said about it, "If you're going to do a movie about Alexander the Great and cover his bisexuality, don't be coy. Just come out and show it."
First of all, Stone wasn't "coy" in either of the first versions. Secondly, don't
look for anything more than what can be found in the first two cuts, because
nothing else was filmed for the most part. The money people made it very
clear what they'd accept and what they wouldn't. Unlike some people around
the net, I don't think you need sex scenes to prove a bond between two
men. This new cut might have a little more between Alexander and the
eunuch, but that's it in terms of sexual content.
Old 08-08-06 | 10:30 AM
  #36  
Josh Z's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,962
Received 350 Likes on 243 Posts
From: Boston
Originally Posted by GLENDALEFALCON
The money people made it very
clear what they'd accept and what they wouldn't.
I'm sure Colin Farrell also made it clear how much male-on-male hugging and kissing he'd actually perform. I have a feeling he kept a cadre of hookers standing by at his disposal so that he could re-assert his heterosexuality between scenes.
Old 08-08-06 | 11:09 AM
  #37  
Geofferson's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 39,973
Received 156 Likes on 127 Posts
From: The Village Green
I have yet to see it as well, so will probably hold off until this eventually comes out.
Old 08-08-06 | 11:20 AM
  #38  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by GLENDALEFALCON
Well, I've seen it fifteen times and certain scenes up to thirty times! It looks
like this forum is full of less than steller film fans. Oh, well! I greatly enjoyed
the 'gay' remark above. That was sure intelligent. I can't imagine what sort
of films you guys like. Although, I'd bet the horrid 'Million $ Baby' and the
awful 'Mystic River' would be up there. How typical!
I'm a less than "steller" (or is that supposed to be "stellar"?) film fan because I disliked a film you happen to enjoy?
Old 08-08-06 | 11:30 AM
  #39  
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Springfield, Mo. - USA
Originally Posted by Corvin
I'm a less than "steller" (or is that supposed to be "stellar"?) film fan because I disliked a film you happen to enjoy?
Oh, sorry! StellAR!! Anyway, the answer to your question is no, but it depends
on why you disliked it. I don't agree with some of the reasons people have
written this film off, and I won't think much of you if your reasons fall into
any of those areas.
Old 08-10-06 | 01:48 AM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by GLENDALEFALCON
'Alexander' was a fantastic, huge, bold, bombastic epic! I loved every second of it, and
will count the days until I can see this new, longer version. Oliver Stone put the best
battle scenes ever filmed into this piece along with the best sets in any film released
this decade. All the performances were over-the-top in a good way and captured just
how HUGE these character were in history. This new cut will place the film up near the
top of all epics made in cinema history. I hope they can get this out sometime in the
first quarter of 2007.
This was sarcasm....right? Otherwise my internet meter must be busted.
Old 08-10-06 | 01:56 AM
  #41  
gryffinmaster's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,552
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Ancient City
I've always been curious about this flick, but 4 hours is a lot of Alexander.
Old 08-10-06 | 09:17 AM
  #42  
Needs to contact a mod about multiple accounts
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,798
Received 17 Likes on 9 Posts
From: Canada
Originally Posted by Josh Z
I'm sure Colin Farrell also made it clear how much male-on-male hugging and kissing he'd actually perform. I have a feeling he kept a cadre of hookers standing by at his disposal so that he could re-assert his heterosexuality between scenes.
I guess you missed the pictures of him making out with some designer...
Old 08-10-06 | 12:18 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mllefoo
He could cut the Angelina Jolie parts and the movie would be a bit better. I like her, but I don't know what drugs she was on to make her think a Natasha russian accent would be a good idea for her character.

I enjoyed bits of the movie, but it did drag. By hour 13 I was wishing for an early death.
This made me laugh. So true.
Old 08-10-06 | 12:29 PM
  #44  
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Springfield, Mo. - USA
Originally Posted by hiccup
This was sarcasm....right? Otherwise my internet meter must be busted.
Nope! 'Alexander' was my Best Picture of 2004, and Stone's third best film
overall.
Old 08-10-06 | 01:20 PM
  #45  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,337
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by GLENDALEFALCON
First of all, Stone wasn't "coy" in either of the first versions. Secondly, don't look for anything more than what can be found in the first two cuts, because nothing else was filmed for the most part.
Really? If you added up all the scenes that were included in both releases, it doesn't seem to add up to the extended running length that people have been talking about here.
Old 08-10-06 | 04:07 PM
  #46  
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Springfield, Mo. - USA
Originally Posted by Peep
Really? If you added up all the scenes that were included in both releases, it doesn't seem to add up to the extended running length that people have been talking about here.
Nobody knows what will be contained in the extra 30-35 min. of footage, but
I doubt it'll be more 'gay' themed scenes.
Old 08-10-06 | 10:26 PM
  #47  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,337
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by GLENDALEFALCON
Nobody knows what will be contained in the extra 30-35 min. of footage, but
I doubt it'll be more 'gay' themed scenes.
Dude, 3 hours ago you were spouting off about how nothing else was filmed so no new stuff will be include. Now you're all 'nobody knows'. Why don't you pipe down until you get some real info.
Old 08-11-06 | 12:18 PM
  #48  
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Springfield, Mo. - USA
Originally Posted by Peep
Dude, 3 hours ago you were spouting off about how nothing else was filmed so no new stuff will be include. Now you're all 'nobody knows'. Why don't you pipe down until you get some real info.
I was CLEARLY talking about any more 'gay' themed (although that word didn't
exist then) scenes. All the new material will be stuff cut out of the first four
hour version shown to Warner Bros. in August of 2004.
Old 08-11-06 | 01:08 PM
  #49  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: knoxville, tn
My question would be how good can this footage be if it's wasn't good enough for both the theatrical and Director's Cut versions? Maybe third time's a charm, but he's passed on using this material twice already now.

(I'm not saying this to rag on Alexander, I think this would apply for most movies.)
Old 08-11-06 | 01:14 PM
  #50  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems like the only person here who can stand Alexander is GlendaleFalcon. They're making it just for you dude, hope you feel special...


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.