![]() |
<img src="http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/P/B0006GAOBI.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg">
|
das |
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
Pretty Woman looks legit to me. The only thing that stands out to me is them being the exact same height.
EDIT: I decided to look around a little bit on the 'net, and it appears there's still different opinions on the Pretty Woman poster. Most sites that mention something about it attribute the body double to actress Shelley Michelle. Shelley is listed on IMDB as an uncredited body double, but I think this kind of listing most likely refers to the movie itself, although she may have been used for the poster as well, I suppose. I even found one site that gives body double credit to "Los Angeles body-double Donna Scoggins". Hard telling what the real deal is. |
I remember that it was made quite clear at the time that it was definitely NOT Julia Roberts' body on the poster.
|
|
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
Pretty Woman looks legit to me. The only thing that stands out to me is them being the exact same height.
|
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
Pretty Woman is NOT legit...Julia threw a hissy fit about that not being her body during press interviews when the movie was first released.
|
Originally Posted by Yocke
The British cover for Infernal Affairs 2 is pretty bad:
http://www.discshop.se/LIVE/shop/img...arge/42857.jpg Maybe the John Woo double gun action guy is a puppet. That's one big puppet. |
While not a head photochop, this one really pisses me off:
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0...CLZZZZZZZ_.jpg I saw the movie, and the movie does not show the kid finding American money, yet they photochop American currency on the cover of this BRITISH MOVIE. I despise the Americanization of British movies, and will be seeking out the region two edition of this one. |
Originally Posted by UAIOE
Radar With Boobs.
Check out Season 8 with Hawkeye's gay hand dangling ... http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0...CLZZZZZZZ_.jpg |
Originally Posted by TomOpus
Believe or not, I remember Bruce being way too thin in that movie. That may not be photoshop after all ... |
|
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0...CLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
If you've seen the original photo, you'll understand why they replaced Keira's head. The expression on her face doesn't exactly endear itself to the ordinary consumer. |
Originally Posted by calhoun07
While not a head photochop, this one really pisses me off:
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0...CLZZZZZZZ_.jpg I saw the movie, and the movie does not show the kid finding American money, yet they photochop American currency on the cover of this BRITISH MOVIE. I despise the Americanization of British movies, and will be seeking out the region two edition of this one. |
Originally Posted by UAIOE
There is other money on the cover as well.
|
Originally Posted by vegasbaby
Believe or not, I remember Bruce being way too thin in that movie.
That may not be photoshop after all ... |
Originally Posted by das Monkey
I like how billing requirements have the stars' names in a specific order, so they're awkwardly placed directly above the wrong photos on the cover.
das http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0...CLZZZZZZZ_.jpg http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0...CLZZZZZZZ_.jpg |
|
Originally Posted by Drexl
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0...CLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
If you've seen the original photo, you'll understand why they replaced Keira's head. The expression on her face doesn't exactly endear itself to the ordinary consumer. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.