tremors box set?
#53
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Portland, Oregon
Originally Posted by marcellusk
it's two disc with one movie on each side. when you open the case they are both packaged on one side over lapping. Picture the way the number 8 looks.
they're like that.
hope this helps
they're like that.
hope this helps
Anyone know if the discs in the Jurassic Park Adventure Pack and the Mummy Collector's Set are packaged the same way?
--THX
#55
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Portland, Oregon
Originally Posted by Fok
I enjoyed the first movie, but haven't seen the others. Worth checking it out?
--THX
#56
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Portland, Oregon
This is curious. A reviewer of this set on Amazon said:
Despite the claims on the packaging for 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen, all four movies are presented in 1.78:1 NON-anamorphic widescreen. In fact, the video transfers are exactly the same as those on the previous DVDs.
As some of you have noted, the transfer for the first film is far and away improved over the previous release. (Don't know about the other three.) And I know someone on here would have long ago revealed if the transfers were not encoded for 16:9. I can only assume this person is terribly mistaken regarding the quality. Just found it intriguing.
--THX
Despite the claims on the packaging for 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen, all four movies are presented in 1.78:1 NON-anamorphic widescreen. In fact, the video transfers are exactly the same as those on the previous DVDs.
As some of you have noted, the transfer for the first film is far and away improved over the previous release. (Don't know about the other three.) And I know someone on here would have long ago revealed if the transfers were not encoded for 16:9. I can only assume this person is terribly mistaken regarding the quality. Just found it intriguing.
--THX
#57
Banned
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 6,364
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
From: Right now, my location is DVDTalk, but then again, you should already know that, shouldn't you?
Originally Posted by CertifiedTHX
This is curious. A reviewer of this set on Amazon said:
Despite the claims on the packaging for 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen, all four movies are presented in 1.78:1 NON-anamorphic widescreen. In fact, the video transfers are exactly the same as those on the previous DVDs.
Despite the claims on the packaging for 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen, all four movies are presented in 1.78:1 NON-anamorphic widescreen. In fact, the video transfers are exactly the same as those on the previous DVDs.
#58
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Guelph, Ontario
That guy probably doesn't have his DVD player set up properly or something, because the new anamorphic transfer looks great and is well worth the upgrade.
MATT
MATT
#59
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: United States
Originally Posted by CertifiedTHX
This is curious. A reviewer of this set on Amazon said:
Despite the claims on the packaging for 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen, all four movies are presented in 1.78:1 NON-anamorphic widescreen. In fact, the video transfers are exactly the same as those on the previous DVDs.
As some of you have noted, the transfer for the first film is far and away improved over the previous release. (Don't know about the other three.) And I know someone on here would have long ago revealed if the transfers were not encoded for 16:9. I can only assume this person is terribly mistaken regarding the quality. Just found it intriguing.
--THX
Despite the claims on the packaging for 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen, all four movies are presented in 1.78:1 NON-anamorphic widescreen. In fact, the video transfers are exactly the same as those on the previous DVDs.
As some of you have noted, the transfer for the first film is far and away improved over the previous release. (Don't know about the other three.) And I know someone on here would have long ago revealed if the transfers were not encoded for 16:9. I can only assume this person is terribly mistaken regarding the quality. Just found it intriguing.
--THX
Tremors 1 is a new transfer?
#60
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bdhart
Saw it at Kmart for $19.99.
#63
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Pennsylvania
Re: tremors box set?
Has anyone picked this up recently and would know if this release is still two double sided discs or have they gone to be two single sided discs. I've held off on this because of that reason. I thought Universal would've re-released this set because of the past issues with their double sided discs.
#65
Re: tremors box set?
Has anyone picked this up recently and would know if this release is still two double sided discs or have they gone to be two single sided discs. I've held off on this because of that reason. I thought Universal would've re-released this set because of the past issues with their double sided discs.
#66
Suspended
Re: tremors box set?
I doubt Uni would go back and make a 2 disc DVD set a 4 Disc DVD set which means more discs and more space taken up on valuable retail space. Isn't that kind of stupid?
#67
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Ontario, Canada
Re: tremors box set?
I have this set. It's 2 double-sided discs and my second disc (Tremors 3 and 4) is defective. I still haven't gotten around to watching 4, but 3 suffers from the usual glitches late in the film that plague these double-sided disgraces, er, discs.
I made a duplicate of the opposite side of the first disc (Tremors 2) so I can avoid that flip-over nonsense.
Tremors 1 looks fantastic, especially compared to the original non-anamorphic release.
I made a duplicate of the opposite side of the first disc (Tremors 2) so I can avoid that flip-over nonsense.
Tremors 1 looks fantastic, especially compared to the original non-anamorphic release.
#68
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Pennsylvania
Re: tremors box set?
Looks like i'll still be holding off on this set. Universal should at least re-release the first movie alone with the new transfer. I wouldn't mind just having it just bare bones as long as it was anamorphic. They should also do the same for The Great Outdoors and Kindergarten cop. Come on Universal show some respect to your older catalog titles!
#69
Re: tremors box set?
Looks like i'll still be holding off on this set. Universal should at least re-release the first movie alone with the new transfer. I wouldn't mind just having it just bare bones as long as it was anamorphic. They should also do the same for The Great Outdoors and Kindergarten cop. Come on Universal show some respect to your older catalog titles!
#70
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Re: tremors box set?
Went to Best Buy and saw alot of the Tremors sets on the shelf for $14.99. They are now in keepcases, but are still the same 2 flipper discs from the digi-pak.
I agree with alot of people in not releasing them on 4 discs. I hate the flipper discs. You can get 3 and 4 at Big Lots now for $3 each. Wish they would remaster the first. With all the technology they have now, they could of at least put two on the same side.
I agree with alot of people in not releasing them on 4 discs. I hate the flipper discs. You can get 3 and 4 at Big Lots now for $3 each. Wish they would remaster the first. With all the technology they have now, they could of at least put two on the same side.
#72
Re: tremors box set?
Went to Best Buy and saw alot of the Tremors sets on the shelf for $14.99. They are now in keepcases, but are still the same 2 flipper discs from the digi-pak.
I agree with alot of people in not releasing them on 4 discs. I hate the flipper discs. You can get 3 and 4 at Big Lots now for $3 each. Wish they would remaster the first. With all the technology they have now, they could of at least put two on the same side.
I agree with alot of people in not releasing them on 4 discs. I hate the flipper discs. You can get 3 and 4 at Big Lots now for $3 each. Wish they would remaster the first. With all the technology they have now, they could of at least put two on the same side.




