"From the Earth to the Moon" - Anamorphic WS/DTS: 9/20/2005
#78
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Legend
So has anyone heard anything further about the anamorphic widescreen vs full frame nature of this release? Any early reviews out there?
#79
DVD Talk Godfather
I was wondering as well.
#87
#88
DVD Talk Legend
Thanks for the great review! I sold off the original release a year or so as I was hoping for a re-release. While I loved the program, I disliked the boxset. I also know it was prone to rot.
I definitely would like to see more comparisons, but I will very likely pick this up today. Not happy about the cropping, but the framing in the 16:9 doesn't look too cramped to me.
I definitely would like to see more comparisons, but I will very likely pick this up today. Not happy about the cropping, but the framing in the 16:9 doesn't look too cramped to me.
#90
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by das Monkey
#91
• bunkaroo •
Not happy about the cropping, but the framing in the 16:9 doesn't look too cramped to me.
Not happy about the cropping, but the framing in the 16:9 doesn't look too cramped to me.
das
#94
Moderator
Originally Posted by Bobbin
2 tidbits:
1. It's $60 on sale at Circuit City this week.
2. It comes with a free ticket to that new IMAX movie, Magnificent Desolation 3-D.
1. It's $60 on sale at Circuit City this week.
2. It comes with a free ticket to that new IMAX movie, Magnificent Desolation 3-D.
I've decided to be sneaky on this purchase, and buy it at Best Buy, return later in the day with the Circuit City ad and get some additional money knocked off the BB sale price.
#95
DVD Talk Godfather
Originally Posted by Goldblum
Thanks, das. Well, there you go, people. It has been cropped after all.
Now to the odd part. The primary force behind this updated release is apparently the brand new anamorphic widescreen transfer. Widescreen is great and anamorphic is essential ... when it's the correct ratio. I've read that during the filming of the miniseries, it was understood that it would one day be presented in widescreen, so shots were framed with both aspect ratios in mind, and therefore the open matte version that aired on HBO and was subsequently released to DVD in 1998 should not be superior to the widescreen version in this "Signature Edition". Oh, how I want to believe that. Clearly, there is cropping in both versions, but I'll let you decide:
Where did you read that das?
#96
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
Well since:
They both looked cropped in one way or another. So it looks like it is a matter of personal preference if you ask me.
Where did you read that das?
They both looked cropped in one way or another. So it looks like it is a matter of personal preference if you ask me.
Where did you read that das?
#97
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1.33:1 is the OAR. I don't think, judging by most of the shots on my original set, that this was composed with 1.78:1 in mind. HBO should be ashamed to put out this great series in altered aspect-ratio.
#98
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: 2nd City
Originally Posted by jmj713
1.33:1 is the OAR. I don't think, judging by most of the shots on my original set, that this was composed with 1.78:1 in mind. HBO should be ashamed to put out this great series in altered aspect-ratio.
#99
• Michael Corvin •
They both looked cropped in one way or another. So it looks like it is a matter of personal preference if you ask me.
Where did you read that das?
They both looked cropped in one way or another. So it looks like it is a matter of personal preference if you ask me.
Where did you read that das?
das
#100
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Personally, I find it really hard to believe shots were composed with anything other than 1.33:1 in mind.




I can't believe we made it to release day without a single review...