Malcolm X SE --> Feb 8
#26
Cool New Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Pluto
Im really looking forward for this dvd. But it does piss me off a bit if they split the movie. I believe the movie is 193 or 200 minutes. That would make the film about 3 hr 8 min or 3 hr 16 min. Movies that long can fit in one disc(JFK,Nixon,Magnolia). Not that its a big deal but movies like Gangs Of New York,2 hr 40 min, also split the film without realy needing it. Anyhow, can't wait for Malcolm X.
#27
DVD Talk Limited Edition
I wanted Criterion to do a SE but hey, this will do (yipee!)
#30
This is nice to see. I just realized the other day that a couple of weeks after the release date will mark 40 years since his assassination, so I wonder if they've timed it to coincide with that.
#31
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Im really looking forward for this dvd. But it does piss me off a bit if they split the movie. I believe the movie is 193 or 200 minutes. That would make the film about 3 hr 8 min or 3 hr 16 min. Movies that long can fit in one disc(JFK,Nixon,Magnolia).
#33
DVD Talk Hero
Originally posted by DavidH
But those movies you quoted would have looked even better if split on two discs. Excessive compression is noticable on all of them, especially Nixon.
But those movies you quoted would have looked even better if split on two discs. Excessive compression is noticable on all of them, especially Nixon.
#34
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally posted by asianxcore
held off buying the current release. will definately be picking this up.
held off buying the current release. will definately be picking this up.
#35
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Sorry to drag this back up, but I've been out of the loop for a while and was really excited to see this. Was hoping for a Criterion, but TW looks to have done a great job based on the description. No complaints here . . . I gotta agree with FantasticVSDoom . . . 2005 is going to be a fantastic release year.
x 2
x 2
#36
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Oklahoma
There was nothing in that description that even remotely suggested the film was being split over the 2 discs. It's much more likely that the film will be on one disc and the extras on the other, especially considering one of the extras is a pretty long documentary on its own.
#39
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by Admiral7
talemyn, relax, Auburn's gonna make it all the way to #2 when the night is over.

Unless, of course, you are not, in fact, a Oklahoma fan, in which case I'd be happy to share.
#40
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 8,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: I was here but I disappear
#42
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Originally Posted by Gil Jawetz
#43
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 8,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: I was here but I disappear
Originally Posted by slop101
So the dvd splits the movie in bad way, huh? bummer...
Yeah, it's abrupt. But that's such a small factor in the overall disc, trust me.
#45
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 8,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: I was here but I disappear
Originally Posted by dmpre99
I dont remember the movie being so long... its not an extended cut is it?
#46
DVD Talk Gold Edition
LOTR:ROTK is 3 hr. 25 min. on one disc, and that has no compression problems - although, it doesn't have commentary like Malcom X will - but those hardly take up any space at all.
What's the big deal of putting in two discs of a nearly 3 1/2 hour movie for enhanced video quality?
#47
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Thanks for the review. I can't wait to see the documentary.
#48
DVD Talk Reviewer
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,094
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: WAS looking for My Own Private Stuckeyville, but stuck in Liberty City (while missing Vice City)
Originally Posted by DavidH
But LOTR still doesn't look as good as the extended version that is split on two discs.
What's the big deal of putting in two discs of a nearly 3 1/2 hour movie for enhanced video quality?
What's the big deal of putting in two discs of a nearly 3 1/2 hour movie for enhanced video quality?
#50
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Fairly good review...
I don't agree that Al Freeman was miscast -- quite the opposite, in fact. Freeman had been largely AWOL from movies at the time, so it was great to see him again. He looked and sounded uncannily like the real person. Malcolm's first meeting with Elijah Mohammed after his prison release was quite a powerful moment. Malcolm is so awestruck and humbled, that he cries.
My impression from Freeman's portrayal was that Elijah was once a great leader, but fought strongly to keep his position (due to his jealousy over Malcolm's star rise in the Nation of Islam) to the point where his lust for power subverted the ideals he was supposed to represent. "We tell the world we're moral leaders because we follow the personal example of the Honorable Elijah Mohammed," Malcolm reminds the aging leader when a scandal breaks out.
I can't really complain if certain parts have a rushed quality, but then again the movie had a very troubled production, running out of money and going over-budget. His book on the making-of the film didn't have too many kind words for the folks at Warner Bros. or Dan Aykroyd (whose name is misspelled).
For me, the weakest part of the movie has always been the epilogue. It would've been more poignant ending with Ossie Davis's eulogy, rather than Spartacus-influenced "I am Malcolm X!" bit. It really didn't fit in. And Nelson Mandela's extremely heavy accent was just too incomprehensible. But it's still one of my favorite films of all time. It did change what I thought of Malcolm X. Until I saw the movie, I only thought he was the angry civil rights leader (his most common portayal in the media) rather than the person who changed his line of thinking for a broader cause towards the end of his life.
I don't agree that Al Freeman was miscast -- quite the opposite, in fact. Freeman had been largely AWOL from movies at the time, so it was great to see him again. He looked and sounded uncannily like the real person. Malcolm's first meeting with Elijah Mohammed after his prison release was quite a powerful moment. Malcolm is so awestruck and humbled, that he cries.
My impression from Freeman's portrayal was that Elijah was once a great leader, but fought strongly to keep his position (due to his jealousy over Malcolm's star rise in the Nation of Islam) to the point where his lust for power subverted the ideals he was supposed to represent. "We tell the world we're moral leaders because we follow the personal example of the Honorable Elijah Mohammed," Malcolm reminds the aging leader when a scandal breaks out.
I can't really complain if certain parts have a rushed quality, but then again the movie had a very troubled production, running out of money and going over-budget. His book on the making-of the film didn't have too many kind words for the folks at Warner Bros. or Dan Aykroyd (whose name is misspelled).
For me, the weakest part of the movie has always been the epilogue. It would've been more poignant ending with Ossie Davis's eulogy, rather than Spartacus-influenced "I am Malcolm X!" bit. It really didn't fit in. And Nelson Mandela's extremely heavy accent was just too incomprehensible. But it's still one of my favorite films of all time. It did change what I thought of Malcolm X. Until I saw the movie, I only thought he was the angry civil rights leader (his most common portayal in the media) rather than the person who changed his line of thinking for a broader cause towards the end of his life.



