Do you think Palpatine is Darth Sidious?
#26
Banned
I think Palpatine is a clone of Sidious with the Force powers removed. That is why Yoda and Mace Windu do not sense the Force within Palpatine since he is a clone with no Force powers. I think in Episode 3, Sidious will kill Palpatine, take his name, and when the Jedi confront him, they will sense the Dark Side in him.
Also, I think Qui-Gon will be the first Force ghost. When Anakin killed the Sand People, you could hear Qui-Gon screaming "NO!" Qui-Gon was always kind of rebellious and did things his own way. Obi-Wan even said that is why he never became a member of the Council. Maybe Qui-Gon found someway to live on after death. He might come back in Episode 3 to teach this to Yoda and Obi-Wan.
Also, I think Qui-Gon will be the first Force ghost. When Anakin killed the Sand People, you could hear Qui-Gon screaming "NO!" Qui-Gon was always kind of rebellious and did things his own way. Obi-Wan even said that is why he never became a member of the Council. Maybe Qui-Gon found someway to live on after death. He might come back in Episode 3 to teach this to Yoda and Obi-Wan.
#27
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Shannon Nutt
I know Lucas approved the cartoon, but I just don't consider these "canon"...I put them in with the Star Wars books, which I don't consider canon, either.
I know Lucas approved the cartoon, but I just don't consider these "canon"...I put them in with the Star Wars books, which I don't consider canon, either.
I'm not a canon expert but I do know that Lucas personally approved both these cartoons and Shadows of the Empire.
Originally posted by kgrogers1979
I think Palpatine is a clone of Sidious with the Force powers removed. That is why Yoda and Mace Windu do not sense the Force within Palpatine since he is a clone with no Force powers.
I think Palpatine is a clone of Sidious with the Force powers removed. That is why Yoda and Mace Windu do not sense the Force within Palpatine since he is a clone with no Force powers.
#29
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Lucas has stated that whatever you see on screen is canon. He also has said that Clone Wars is canon. It's his way of connecting episode II with Episode III without wasting time in Episode III introducing characters that will be used. But for the most part, Clone wars is very canon. You should take it like this. Everything you see on screen is canon. Things you read and Expanded Universe isn't. Clone wars is not Expanded, it's bridging.
#30
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by Jackskeleton
Lucas has stated that whatever you see on screen is canon. He also has said that Clone Wars is canon.
Lucas has stated that whatever you see on screen is canon. He also has said that Clone Wars is canon.
If he's backed off that recently, I'd be curious to see the quote.
#31
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by bboisvert
Can you provide a source/quote for this? To my knowledge, Lucas has always stated that ONLY the theatrical films are canon.
If he's backed off that recently, I'd be curious to see the quote.
Can you provide a source/quote for this? To my knowledge, Lucas has always stated that ONLY the theatrical films are canon.
If he's backed off that recently, I'd be curious to see the quote.
But I find it hard to believe that he said "everything on screen" or "only the theatrocal films" are canon. Because he officially stated that Shadows of the Empire is canon.
#33
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Because he officially stated that Shadows of the Empire is canon.
As far as I'm concerned, only the films are canon. Everything else is not.
Can you provide a source/quote for this? To my knowledge, Lucas has always stated that ONLY the theatrical films are canon.
#34
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
He may have said that BEFORE thinking about making the Clone Wars cartoons.
Lucas allowed them to use the universe because he thought he was never going to go back on it with the only item they couldn't touch was the prequel time line simply because there was a chance he may do it... which he currently is. But you get the point.
Clone wars is being used as a lead in. So it's canon. The characters are being introduced in it so that they don't waste time on that in episode III since there is a lot of ground to cover.
We can really go on all day about what is canon and what isn't since Lucas really makes it vauge on what is and isn't canon. But prior to the prequels, he said that the only thing that was canon was what was on the screen.
#35
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Terrell
Source please? Lucas to my knowledge has never claimed anything in the EU is canon. In fact, nothing in the EU is canon. In fact, Lucas even ignores EU, even contradicting some things in the films. The films, and only the films are canon. He may have said the Clone War shorts are canon, but I haven't heard that. Everything in the film supercedes everything else.
Source please? Lucas to my knowledge has never claimed anything in the EU is canon. In fact, nothing in the EU is canon. In fact, Lucas even ignores EU, even contradicting some things in the films. The films, and only the films are canon. He may have said the Clone War shorts are canon, but I haven't heard that. Everything in the film supercedes everything else.
Examples:
http://starwars.com/databank/charact...ywalker/?id=eu
http://starwars.com/databank/charact...thrawn/eu.html
Also, I'm not an EU expert but what EU stuff does he contradict in the films?
As for Shadows of the Empire, I remember reading that he recognized it, but here's something I found:
It may be true that none of the post-ROTJ ideas from the novels and comics are going to be in the prequels, but SOTE (Shadows of the Empire) is not post-ROTJ. It occurred in between Empire and ROTJ. Swoops, the Outrider and other creations from SOTE appeared in the special editions. Hence, I bet that Prince Xizor will be in the prequels while Thrawn (a post-ROTJ) creation will not be. (Source: Sealy) (Ed. Note: George has a great amount of respect for SOTE and he says it is a story he wishes he could have made into a movie. So it is not surprising that many of the ideas from SOTE made appearances in the special editions.)
#36
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
But the difference between that is that whole little wall between "THE MOVIE" and "Expanded Universe" when it comes to character profiles.
And just because they have their own toys doesn't mean much. They have toys on the concept art of troopers. Doesn't make it any more real. Lucas likes to market things.
Here is this stuff:
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Misc/Canon.html
http://www.sfdebris.com/faq02.html
So pretty much follows the ST view of it all, and that is where the "only canon is what is on screen". what was written for SW was before Clone wars and Lucas expansion to the small screen. But taking the whole "on screen" method of thinking, it would be justified to say that On screen can also mean what is on television.
And just because they have their own toys doesn't mean much. They have toys on the concept art of troopers. Doesn't make it any more real. Lucas likes to market things.
Here is this stuff:
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Misc/Canon.html
According to Lucasfilm, this is the Star Wars canon hierarchy:
1.
The movies
2.
The movie novelizations, screenplays, radio dramas, and DK companion materials (Visual Dictionary, Incredible Cross-Sections, Inside the Worlds)
3.
The rest of the "Expanded Universe". This is to be treated in much the same way as we treat real-life history books, so there is more uncertainty about events which take place long ago, ie- farther away from the movies on the timeline, and sources can be legitimately evaluated on the basis of their apparent quality of research or editorial bias. For example, the obvious anti-Empire bias among historians in the immediate post-Endor era can be credited for such outlandishly cretinous statements as the KJA claim that the construction of the Executor (an insignificant speck compared to either Death Star) "nearly bankrupted the Empire".
1.
The movies
2.
The movie novelizations, screenplays, radio dramas, and DK companion materials (Visual Dictionary, Incredible Cross-Sections, Inside the Worlds)
3.
The rest of the "Expanded Universe". This is to be treated in much the same way as we treat real-life history books, so there is more uncertainty about events which take place long ago, ie- farther away from the movies on the timeline, and sources can be legitimately evaluated on the basis of their apparent quality of research or editorial bias. For example, the obvious anti-Empire bias among historians in the immediate post-Endor era can be credited for such outlandishly cretinous statements as the KJA claim that the construction of the Executor (an insignificant speck compared to either Death Star) "nearly bankrupted the Empire".
http://www.sfdebris.com/faq02.html
ORDOVER: Abosultely nothing is canon that is not on-screen.......
ORDOVER: Let me ad one last thing...
ORDOVER: George Lucas has announced that he does not feel bound by what was developed about Boba Fett's background in the SW novels.
ORDOVER: Which means that the SW novels occupy the same status as the Trek novels.
ORDOVER: Let me ad one last thing...
ORDOVER: George Lucas has announced that he does not feel bound by what was developed about Boba Fett's background in the SW novels.
ORDOVER: Which means that the SW novels occupy the same status as the Trek novels.
So pretty much follows the ST view of it all, and that is where the "only canon is what is on screen". what was written for SW was before Clone wars and Lucas expansion to the small screen. But taking the whole "on screen" method of thinking, it would be justified to say that On screen can also mean what is on television.
Last edited by Jackskeleton; 10-26-04 at 10:11 AM.
#39
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally posted by Class316
Star Wars was on the small screen long before Clone Wars. Example, Droids cartoon series, Holiday Special.
Star Wars was on the small screen long before Clone Wars. Example, Droids cartoon series, Holiday Special.
#40
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally posted by bboisvert
Still waiting for these statements from Lucas that the Clone Wars and Shadows of the Empire are canon...
????
Still waiting for these statements from Lucas that the Clone Wars and Shadows of the Empire are canon...
????
?????
Please feel free to step in and actually do some work for your own belief, will you now. I've shown you something that has "on screen" as canon. This was before clone wars, but being that clone wars was done because lucas.. again.. wanted to have something linking AotC with RotS sounds like it's canon to me. Where as Shadows of the empire was just another of those EU stories Lucas later thought was neat, but didn't personally want it to be done.
In truth, Lucas hasn't made a formal announcment on what is actually canon and non-canon when it comes to tv. Sure, the holiday special pretty much is a smear on the windsheild of his creation, but he has expressed interest to let the SW saga continue on with a potential TV show after all is said and done. Now is that canon or not? Infact, the only thing that lucas really points to as Non-canon specificlly is the books
Many fans of the original Star Wars movies reject the literary works of the Expanded Universe, and insist only the films or statements George Lucas has made interpreting his own works, can be accepted as canonical.
We take the idea that lucas makes it clear that both the films on screen and the screen plays are canon. You have to think for a second. Those cartoons, they have scripts right? They are on screen.... hmmmm indeed. Till I see some formal knowledge that those are not canon, I'm sticking to believing they are canon. While along the lines of books, he has already made it clear that they are Expanded Universe stuff.
Last edited by Jackskeleton; 10-26-04 at 12:19 PM.
#41
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Jackskeleton
those never existed if you ask Lucas. While clone wars on the other hand, is going to get another go around. see the difference?
those never existed if you ask Lucas. While clone wars on the other hand, is going to get another go around. see the difference?
And actually, a couple of the Droids cartoons officially made it on DVD to coincide with the trilogy on DVD.
Note that the Holiday Special, despite being horribly bad, does not contradict anything.
For Shadows of the Empire, yea Lucas didn’t initially request it to be done, but once done he liked it and thought of it as linking ESB and ROTJ in much the same way he thinks of Clone Wars as linking AOTC and ROTS. Also, as I stated already many things from SOTE made it on the 97 SE. So really for all practical purposes it is as canon as the Clone Wars, even if it originated differently.
Coruscent was in SOTE before it was in any of the SW movies (though I’m not sure if it’s the first mention of Coruscent in all official SW stuff).
#42
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
So really for all practical purposes it is as canon as the Clone Wars, even if it originated differently.
Though, the whole idea is very loose and nothing official other than "books = no/ on scree = yes" has been stated. So it's a tough call.
#43
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by Jackskeleton
Please feel free to step in and actually do some work for your own belief, will you now.
Please feel free to step in and actually do some work for your own belief, will you now.
Lucas has stated that whatever you see on screen is canon. He also has said that Clone Wars is canon.
In truth, Lucas hasn't made a formal announcment on what is actually canon and non-canon when it comes to tv.
Here's a whole list of quotes from Lucas, Lucasfilm, and others on the subject of what is canonical and what isn't:
http://www.st-v-sw.net/STSWCanonquotes.html
You'll see that Lucas did address TV shows to a certain extent:
"Because I'm retiring from this part of my creative life, I'm open to more TV Product. but not more feature films, the story is complete. [and any other story wouldn't be my philosophy and views,] the books are not the same philosophy as the movies."
This was from a Q&A session w/Lucas in Nov. 2003, when Clone Wars was definitely already a reality. He's basically saying the same thing he's said since day 1: The movies are canon. Everything else is just fun speculation.
The Clone Wars program didn't develop any differently than any other EU material. Someone else (not Lucas) wrote it, Lucas/Lucasfilm approved or rejected parts of it, and it went to production. Just because it is on TV rather than in print, doesn't make it less EU.
#44
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
hmm, you got a point there.
Though I would still like to hear some actual reference to the clone wars cartoon as not being canon other than lumping it with "everything else" which seems to be pointing towards the books mostly.
Though I would still like to hear some actual reference to the clone wars cartoon as not being canon other than lumping it with "everything else" which seems to be pointing towards the books mostly.
#45
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Now that I walk away with my tail between my legs
here to answer the original question posed in this thread
spoiler ahead from episode III about sid/palp.
here to answer the original question posed in this thread
spoiler ahead from episode III about sid/palp.
Spoiler:
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by marioxb
Shadows of the Empire was a book? I thought it was just an N64 game? OK, yeah, I don't read books.
Shadows of the Empire was a book? I thought it was just an N64 game? OK, yeah, I don't read books.