Okay, I know that there are two versions of Robocop, the original 1987 movie. The editted version, and the unrated version with gory scenes put back in.

What I'd like to know is, does this DVD http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0...1.LZZZZZZZ.jpg contain the unrated version of the movie? Which is also part of the trilogy set: http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0...1.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

OR

Do I have to buy the more expensive Criterion Collection version? http://images.amazon.com/images/P/15...1.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

Thanks for the help.

I'd go with the MGM Trilogy set...its cheaper than the Criterion...has better extras...better Audio/Video...cooler packaging...and you get two other movies...one of which is actually pretty good...

I thought the R1 MGM Robocop wasn't unrated?

I'd hoped the single MGM version was unrated cuz it's cheap, and I'm not crazy about the sequels. But looks like the trilogy it is.

Thanks for your replies.

Razor Ramon. Cool nickname!

You can alsways sell the sequels.

The disc you had a picture of is the rated version.

The Critierion is the definitive version to have. It has the original Dolby 2.0 track, director's uncut version of the film, director approved aspect ratio (1.66:1), great commentary track, with a few extras, and it's OOP. I would not buy the trilogy because I do not want Robocop 3 in my collection.

Mikko Rasinkangas is correct. You can only get the unrated version in the Trilogy box set or the Criterion version. I found out the hard way buying the first movie separately. Anyone with the box set want to swap Robocops?

No version that's non-anamorphic can be "definitive" in my book. There is currently no "definitive" version, but the MGM comes close with an anamorphic transfer and the uncut version.

Yes, yet another reason why I don't get the draw to Criterion when they release non-anamorphic discs. For a company, such as Criterion to release non-anamorphic titles would be like Cadillac making a Chevy Cavalier and slapping a Cadillac label on it. Oh wait, they did...it was called the Cimeron.

I have the Criterion Version and absolutly love it. I even think the artwork is much cooler then the glossy MGM cover. RoboCop was a dark styled film and I think the CC captures it perfectly.

The Criterion is the only version that is (1) complete, (2) in the proper aspect ratio, and (3) correctly color-timed.

Robocop comparison:

http://207.136.67.23/film/DVDCompare3/robocop.htm

Because (yep, it's the obvious answer) they *stopped* releasing non-anamorphic discs.

But, you're totally right, they should go back and re-release 'Robocop' in anamorphic, even though they no longer own the copyright and would thus be sued. Otherwise, they're just another overrated DVD distributor. And over-priced too!

Does anyone know if this edition of Robocop, which has a different UPC than that of the current MGM/UA edition, is the "Unrated" version included the recently released Trilogy box-set?

It says 102 mins. which is the theatrical version. The uncut one is slightly longer...

Even though I really like my Criterion edition Robocop, if I was a casual buyer, I'd just get the MGM Trilogy. You get a better transfer (The CC edition was transfered from Laser Disc) and you get Robocop 2 and 3. Even though part 3 is kinda stinky compared to the first 2 you can have all 3 for what it will cost you to get the Criterion Robocop.

The trilogy has the same uncut scenes as the Criterion.

The MGM transfer looks a hell of a lot better than CC's.
The AR is somewhat inconsequential; 1.66 vs. 1.85 is no big deal and 1.85 was the intended ratio anyway, 1.66 the negative.
So while I would prefer 1.66, a better looking print takes precendence.

I saw that, but am hoping that dvdsoon has it wrong.

It also says rated "R". That might give you an indication it isn't unrated too!

The draw could be perhaps that they released the only "Unrated" version some 6 YEARS before this MGM version! So basically it's like getting a 2004 Cimeron (non-leather package) in 1998- rare and collectible!

I was just looking at my DVDs, seeing what I should trade in to Blockbuster and I have 3 versions of RoboCop on DVD. Trilogy Director's Cut, MGM Theatrical Cut and Criterion. I was wondering if the same transfer was used on both MGM versions. So if I decide to get rid of the trilogy version and keep the Criterion and Theatrical versions together in one slim-double case, am I really missing much, besides extras? I mean that way I can have both the enhanced transfer and theatrical aspect ratio (theatrical disc) and director prefered transfer and aspect ratio (criterion version). Right?

I'd say pick up the trilogy set. I have both the CE and boxset as the extra's are different.

Is there actually a 4th Robocop DVD?

I have the Image Robocop Trilogy...now is that the same as the MGM Version?

Im lost here...

Thanks

to put it blunty...no