La Dolce Vita Cover and Features
#51
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When I made the thread I certainly wasn't expecting to see a company representative speak on it. I would like to thank him for coming on to discuss one of my most looking forward to DVD's and whomever asked him the questions of the PAL issue as that was something I personally was unaware of. Insightful thread.
#52
Suspended
Originally posted by tim hinsley
I'm glad that you enjoyed Umbrellas, it was great to work with Anges Varda. We are hoping to announce another collaboration with the Demy estate in the very near future.
I'm glad that you enjoyed Umbrellas, it was great to work with Anges Varda. We are hoping to announce another collaboration with the Demy estate in the very near future.
If I understand you correctly, PAL-NTSC problems can be surmounted in such a way that the final transfer produces a correct speed rate without ghosting. Feel free to elaborate on technical advances you know about that we don't.
I had a feeling these problems were not terminal. It's just that nobody ever goes to any length to correct them in our material world.
I am looking forward to La Dolce Vita and the Fellini TV extras sound terrific.
#53
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: "Sitting on a beach, earning 20%"
Posts: 6,154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I'm very happy to see a representative from the company on here to clarify some issues. Correct me if I'm wrong:
Koch Lorber can only present what the rights holders give them. So if the rights holders only have a PAL master to give you, then that's all you've got and that's all you can release. You make an NTSC transfer from that PAL master. In the case of La Dolce Vita you can't get the original 35mm elements from the rights holders to do a proper NTSC transfer, so instead you do a PAL conversion.
Will La Dolce Vita, as released in R1 by Koch Lorber, be 4% shorter?
Will La Dolce Vita, as released in R1 by Koch Lorber, have the sound pitched slightly higer due to this speed up?
Koch Lorber can only present what the rights holders give them. So if the rights holders only have a PAL master to give you, then that's all you've got and that's all you can release. You make an NTSC transfer from that PAL master. In the case of La Dolce Vita you can't get the original 35mm elements from the rights holders to do a proper NTSC transfer, so instead you do a PAL conversion.
Will La Dolce Vita, as released in R1 by Koch Lorber, be 4% shorter?
Will La Dolce Vita, as released in R1 by Koch Lorber, have the sound pitched slightly higer due to this speed up?
#54
DVD Talk Reviewer
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Blu-ray.com
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Without being a member of the Koch company I can assure you that:
1. Yes
2. Yes
Format conversion and sourcing are two different areas. Unless the NTSC version is directly sourced from the original film negative the above mentioned issues will appear. Slight adjustments could be made however "ghosting" will still be present.
Pro-B
1. Yes
2. Yes
Format conversion and sourcing are two different areas. Unless the NTSC version is directly sourced from the original film negative the above mentioned issues will appear. Slight adjustments could be made however "ghosting" will still be present.
Pro-B
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by JayHM
La Dolce Vita was most likely shot at 25fps, like most European films. In which case, the shorter version is the actual original running time.
La Dolce Vita was most likely shot at 25fps, like most European films. In which case, the shorter version is the actual original running time.
#57
DVD Talk Special Edition
Can anybody here comment on the image quality of the Korean edition:
http://www.dvdasian.com/cgi-bin/dvda...ml?id=mMgwvuyY
http://www.dvdasian.com/cgi-bin/dvda...ml?id=mMgwvuyY
#58
DVD Talk Reviewer
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Blu-ray.com
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by skatefan20
Can anybody here comment on the image quality of the Korean edition:
http://www.dvdasian.com/cgi-bin/dvda...ml?id=mMgwvuyY
Can anybody here comment on the image quality of the Korean edition:
http://www.dvdasian.com/cgi-bin/dvda...ml?id=mMgwvuyY
Pro-B
#59
Suspended
Originally posted by pro-bassoonist
Without being a member of the Koch company I can assure you that:
1. Yes
2. Yes
Format conversion and sourcing are two different areas. Unless the NTSC version is directly sourced from the original film negative the above mentioned issues will appear. Slight adjustments could be made however "ghosting" will still be present.
Pro-B
Without being a member of the Koch company I can assure you that:
1. Yes
2. Yes
Format conversion and sourcing are two different areas. Unless the NTSC version is directly sourced from the original film negative the above mentioned issues will appear. Slight adjustments could be made however "ghosting" will still be present.
Pro-B
I think that's what the nice man from Koch was trying to say but didn't actually say and I sure wish he would say it.
Last edited by baracine; 06-24-04 at 09:30 AM.
#60
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by JayHM
La Dolce Vita was most likely shot at 25fps, like most European films. In which case, the shorter version is the actual original running time.
La Dolce Vita was most likely shot at 25fps, like most European films. In which case, the shorter version is the actual original running time.
Now that would be funny, but I think FilmFanSea is right.....
Tim Hinsley wrote:
PAL/NTSC conversion. We did have to use a PAL master for the restoration, as all 35mm and NTSC materials that we located were of very poor quality.
Thanks for the input.
#61
Suspended
Originally posted by pro-bassoonist
Without being a member of the Koch company I can assure you that:
1. Yes
2. Yes
Format conversion and sourcing are two different areas. Unless the NTSC version is directly sourced from the original film negative the above mentioned issues will appear. Slight adjustments could be made however "ghosting" will still be present.
Pro-B
Without being a member of the Koch company I can assure you that:
1. Yes
2. Yes
Format conversion and sourcing are two different areas. Unless the NTSC version is directly sourced from the original film negative the above mentioned issues will appear. Slight adjustments could be made however "ghosting" will still be present.
Pro-B
#62
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by baracine
My two cents: If the PAL original has the 24 discrete images per second of the original film in superior PAL resolution (plus one extra frame per seconf when played back in PAL, it is theoretically possible to do a transfer from this source just as it would be from the 24 frames per second of a regular film source with "today's improving technology". It's a question of tweaking the 3-to-2 pulldown, just as you would with film to make 24 images fit the 30 images per second of NTSC.
My two cents: If the PAL original has the 24 discrete images per second of the original film in superior PAL resolution (plus one extra frame per seconf when played back in PAL, it is theoretically possible to do a transfer from this source just as it would be from the 24 frames per second of a regular film source with "today's improving technology". It's a question of tweaking the 3-to-2 pulldown, just as you would with film to make 24 images fit the 30 images per second of NTSC.
#63
Suspended
Originally posted by Mark_vdH
There is no actual material lost when transferring a movie to video, is there?
There is no actual material lost when transferring a movie to video, is there?
Having said this, each individual frame of PAL (composed of two screen replenishes of 1/50th of a second each) contains the available information of a single frame of film in a format that has more resolution per frame than in NTSC, where the notion of "an individual frame of film" is problematic since the conversion of 24 frames per second into 30 frames per second (60 replenishes per second) necessitates a manipulation called a pulldown, of which there are several different varieties, each claiming to be better than the other but each presenting at least a few blurred (or repeating) frames per second.
So, all things considered, PAL is the ideal video format for preserving the information of each individual frame of a film, even though it is projected at a 4 % speed-up. Simply slowing down this speed during transfer to NTSC produces ghosting but, like I said, why would it not be possible to recreate the original 24 frames per second film from the individual higher resolution PAL frames and then transfer it to NTSC in the regular film-to-video fashion?
Last edited by baracine; 06-24-04 at 12:09 PM.
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by FilmFanSea
No--all modern films are shot to run at 24fps. The 25fps is the PAL television standard, whereas the NTSC standard is 30fps.
No--all modern films are shot to run at 24fps. The 25fps is the PAL television standard, whereas the NTSC standard is 30fps.
I understand that many European television productions are shot at 25fps, to ease the transition to the PAL format but AFAIK, European feature films are still shot and projected at the 24fps standard.
References:
Motion Picture Editor's Guild Magazine:
Overseas television producers run film cameras at 25 fps, do their post production at 25 fps and deliver PAL. But features are more complicated because they’re shot and projected at 24 fps.
With very few exceptions, non-silent films run with a speed of 24 fps (frames per second).
If the European sync speed standard has indeed changed to 25fps for theatrically projected feature films more recently, I would be interested to know the details (e.g. when the transition occurred).
Last edited by FilmFanSea; 06-24-04 at 10:12 AM.
#65
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by FilmFanSea
I am certainly no expert in this area: I've never been to film school; I've neither shot nor projected a film either here or abroad. But from everything I've read, a European feature film from 1960 would have been shot and projected at a sync speed of 24fps.
I am certainly no expert in this area: I've never been to film school; I've neither shot nor projected a film either here or abroad. But from everything I've read, a European feature film from 1960 would have been shot and projected at a sync speed of 24fps.
#66
Cool New Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And I DID go to film school, and you can blame one of my film professors for the misinformation. (I'm glad the internet is a more accurate source of info than a $100,000 education...)
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by JayHM
And I DID go to film school, and you can blame one of my film professors for the misinformation. (I'm glad the internet is a more accurate source of info than a $100,000 education...)
And I DID go to film school, and you can blame one of my film professors for the misinformation. (I'm glad the internet is a more accurate source of info than a $100,000 education...)
No problem--thanks for posting the follow-up.
Brian
#70
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by pro-bassoonist
Last but not least the 4% "problems" you mention are in the heart of the great debate - PAL vs NTSC. Some regard it as a "problem" I dont. My stance has always been that you could detect the speed-up only if you listen to your native tongue (I would assume Engilsh) and have been exposed to the original film product sans the 4% speed-up. . In my opinion even if one has a perfect pitch one will be unable to detect a difference (imagine Japanese, Korean, Italian, French or whatever film obviously in a language you dont understand....how will you know/detect the speed-up??...the obertones, nasal vibrations, etc., ARE absolutely unique for each language).
Last but not least the 4% "problems" you mention are in the heart of the great debate - PAL vs NTSC. Some regard it as a "problem" I dont. My stance has always been that you could detect the speed-up only if you listen to your native tongue (I would assume Engilsh) and have been exposed to the original film product sans the 4% speed-up. . In my opinion even if one has a perfect pitch one will be unable to detect a difference (imagine Japanese, Korean, Italian, French or whatever film obviously in a language you dont understand....how will you know/detect the speed-up??...the obertones, nasal vibrations, etc., ARE absolutely unique for each language).
Am I correct in assuming that if and when HD on disc becomes a reality this whole issue of conversion speedup (and ghosting) will go away (along with the rest of my life savings)?
#71
DVD Talk Reviewer
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Blu-ray.com
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont see how my post above which you have quoted states an opinion that disproves anything you have to say here. I did mention that there are 2 specific ways for anyone to detect the pitch correction-
1.If one has been exposed to a film source not affected by PAL conversion for a long period of time
2. The film happens to be in your native tongue and one has AGAIN been exposed to it for a long period of time hence knowing the obertones, specific pitch frequency, etc...
I am also with a perfect pitch and can recognize the orchestral standard of 440-436.
With this said I challenge you to listen to visiting European orchestras (if you happen to be in Chicago, LA, NY,Boston) they all perform at 441-444 pitch base. American orchestras perform at 338 often even lower. Not once have I heard someone complaining about the pitch difference. Keep in mind that a difference of 436-442 equates in a much bigger discrepancy than what you would encounter in a PAL to NTSC conversion which is arguably around 4%.
Pro-B
1.If one has been exposed to a film source not affected by PAL conversion for a long period of time
2. The film happens to be in your native tongue and one has AGAIN been exposed to it for a long period of time hence knowing the obertones, specific pitch frequency, etc...
I am also with a perfect pitch and can recognize the orchestral standard of 440-436.
With this said I challenge you to listen to visiting European orchestras (if you happen to be in Chicago, LA, NY,Boston) they all perform at 441-444 pitch base. American orchestras perform at 338 often even lower. Not once have I heard someone complaining about the pitch difference. Keep in mind that a difference of 436-442 equates in a much bigger discrepancy than what you would encounter in a PAL to NTSC conversion which is arguably around 4%.
Pro-B
#72
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by baracine
PAGING MR. HINSLEY! (Is this thing on?)
PAGING MR. HINSLEY! (Is this thing on?)
what questions do you have?
Couldn't the material that the PAL masters were made from be used?
Thanks for the input. [/B][/QUOTE]
As Tim mentioned before me, unfortunately, we only had the PAL master to work from.
The only 35 mm print we had access to was a different cut of the movie and there were scenes missing not to mention it was in horrible shape.
#73
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: You have moved into a dark place. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I realise I'm coming into this a little late...
Glad to hear that this is FINALLY coming to a decent quality DVD.
It's unfortunate that only a PAL master was available.
Hopefully it won't look too awful, but I may give this a rental before deciding on a purchase. I wasn't happy at all with Umbrellas of Cherbourg, which I believe was also converted from a PAL master?
Mostly my dissatisfaction with the new version of UoC (as opposed to the horrible looking Fox Lorber version from a few years ago) has to do with not including the original audio, and the lack of extras. A commentary would have been nice, and there are many facets of the film that could have been explored in featurettes.
In any case, I'm aware of the problems inherent in transfering a 25fps PAL telecine to a 29.97fps NTSC (NTSC isn't really quite 30fps, which makes for other fun problems) and hope that ghosting and jitter can be reduced to the point where it doesn't distract from the presentation.
If you've ever seen a PAL->NTSC conversion transfer generally the entire film is basically unwatchable and looks more like video than film - see the TLA version of "The Pianist" for a worst-case scenario of this effect.
Anyway, I trust that you'll do what you can to make the disc at least *watchable* without causing a seizure from the jitter, and I must thank you for including the original mono sound track. The lack of the original ST on the Cherbourg disc was irksome - I bought it, but I questioned whether I'd ever buy another Koch Lorber release again.
So I'm wary, now. That Koch name has a bad bad reputation in this business.
Glad to hear that this is FINALLY coming to a decent quality DVD.
It's unfortunate that only a PAL master was available.
Hopefully it won't look too awful, but I may give this a rental before deciding on a purchase. I wasn't happy at all with Umbrellas of Cherbourg, which I believe was also converted from a PAL master?
Mostly my dissatisfaction with the new version of UoC (as opposed to the horrible looking Fox Lorber version from a few years ago) has to do with not including the original audio, and the lack of extras. A commentary would have been nice, and there are many facets of the film that could have been explored in featurettes.
In any case, I'm aware of the problems inherent in transfering a 25fps PAL telecine to a 29.97fps NTSC (NTSC isn't really quite 30fps, which makes for other fun problems) and hope that ghosting and jitter can be reduced to the point where it doesn't distract from the presentation.
If you've ever seen a PAL->NTSC conversion transfer generally the entire film is basically unwatchable and looks more like video than film - see the TLA version of "The Pianist" for a worst-case scenario of this effect.
Anyway, I trust that you'll do what you can to make the disc at least *watchable* without causing a seizure from the jitter, and I must thank you for including the original mono sound track. The lack of the original ST on the Cherbourg disc was irksome - I bought it, but I questioned whether I'd ever buy another Koch Lorber release again.
So I'm wary, now. That Koch name has a bad bad reputation in this business.
#74
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by jough
I wasn't happy at all with Umbrellas of Cherbourg, which I believe was also converted from a PAL master?
Mostly my dissatisfaction with the new version of UoC (as opposed to the horrible looking Fox Lorber version from a few years ago) has to do with not including the original audio, and the lack of extras. A commentary would have been nice, and there are many facets of the film that could have been explored in featurettes.
The lack of the original ST on the Cherbourg disc was irksome - I bought it, but I questioned whether I'd ever buy another Koch Lorber release again.
I wasn't happy at all with Umbrellas of Cherbourg, which I believe was also converted from a PAL master?
Mostly my dissatisfaction with the new version of UoC (as opposed to the horrible looking Fox Lorber version from a few years ago) has to do with not including the original audio, and the lack of extras. A commentary would have been nice, and there are many facets of the film that could have been explored in featurettes.
The lack of the original ST on the Cherbourg disc was irksome - I bought it, but I questioned whether I'd ever buy another Koch Lorber release again.
We worked directly w/Eclair Labs in France. Agnes Varda was nice enough to make a 35 mm print available to us. Eclair Labs did major restoration work on the print and then went straight to NTSC Digibeta and did yet more work to clean things up.
As for the audio, the original mono track was transferred directly from the print. And that is what's on the DVD along with a 5.1 mix we had done at another facility. There was supposed to be a stereo track but Eclair Labs never delivered it. i found this out after that fact when the DVD was a week from release and Agnes called me to see if we could delay the release as our master only had the mono on not stereo. Apparently she origanally requested that Eclair labs provide it and they never did.
All of the work at Eclair Labs was done under the watchful eyes and with the final approval of Agnes Varda.
As for the extras, we tried to get more content but were unfortunately not able to secure anything in a timely manner.
We were bound by contract release thew film with in a specified amount of time and so we moved forward with what we had.