Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Archives > Archives > DVD Talk Archive
Reload this Page >

Alice in Wonderland - Widescreen?

Community
Search

Alice in Wonderland - Widescreen?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-04, 07:59 AM
  #1  
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: OOOOOlathe
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Alice in Wonderland - Widescreen?

Excuse me if this has been discussed (I did search), but I was looking for Alice in Wonderland this weekend, and all I saw at Target and FYE said Full Screen under the technical specifications. Is there a seperate widescreen version? Does it include both even though it only says full screen? Was the movie not widescreen in the first place?
ESUguy is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 08:06 AM
  #2  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Hail to the Redskins!
Posts: 25,295
Likes: 0
Received 49 Likes on 38 Posts
Alice is in it's proper aspect ratio.
DVD Josh is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 08:20 AM
  #3  
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: OOOOOlathe
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you very much, I just wasn't sure.
ESUguy is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 08:27 AM
  #4  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Hail to the Redskins!
Posts: 25,295
Likes: 0
Received 49 Likes on 38 Posts
You aren't the only one! I and many other people here watched as people asked Best Buy CSRs where the WS version was
DVD Josh is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 08:39 AM
  #5  
Suspended - needs to provide a working email
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This was discussed at length here:

http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthr...ighlight=alice
elise is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 10:57 AM
  #6  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not to berate anyone, honestly, but it should be obvious that a 1951 film would be in a 1.33:1 (or rather 1.37:1) ratio. Also, Disney has been releasing their animated classics in OAR always, so this wouldn't be an exception.
jmj713 is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 11:20 AM
  #7  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: You have moved into a dark place. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by jmj713
Not to berate anyone, honestly, but it should be obvious that a 1951 film would be in a 1.33:1 (or rather 1.37:1) ratio. Also, Disney has been releasing their animated classics in OAR always, so this wouldn't be an exception.
Why would it be obvious? How can the year that widescreen ratios began being used be obvious? You either know the history of aspect ratios, or you don't. It's not exactly common knowledge, and there's no way to know other than to ask or look it up.

Go easy on the noobs. Sheesh.
jough is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 01:11 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: OOOOOlathe
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why the hell would this be obvious? I had absolutely no idea exactly what year the movie came out. Besides, why do I even care when they started using various aspect ratios.

The first response to this thread was plenty. I did not need you to come in hear and crap all over me. I buy movies that I enjoy or that I think my family will enjoy. I buy widescreen because I do respect the director's vision, and enjoy the expanded shots. I have had a dvd player for 5 years now, and do not need to be talked down like a "noob"
ESUguy is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 01:30 PM
  #9  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Alice in Wonderland - Widescreen?

Originally posted by ESUguy
Excuse me if this has been discussed (I did search)
Not to treat you like a noob, but this thread would have answered your question.
Gerry P. is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 01:37 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by jmj713
it should be obvious that a 1951 film
It's not even obvious to me that this is a 1951 film. I can't recall seeing an original production year on the box of any of my classic Disney titles.

-AC
acostigan is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 01:43 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: OOOOOlathe
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Re: Alice in Wonderland - Widescreen?

Originally posted by Gerry P.
Not to treat you like a noob, but this thread would have answered your question.
Yeah, I searched again, and it is halfway down the second search results page. I must have missed it. Shit, most aspect ratio questions are 84 pages long and on the front page.
ESUguy is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 02:16 PM
  #12  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Re: Re: Alice in Wonderland - Widescreen?

Originally posted by ESUguy
Yeah, I searched again, and it is halfway down the second search results page. I must have missed it. Shit, most aspect ratio questions are 84 pages long and on the front page.
I only came up with three threads in my search.

http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/search....by=&sortorder=

EDIT

And not to be a jerk or anything, but if you collect DVDs, knowing a little something about the history of widescreen can be very helpful when shopping.

Last edited by Gerry P.; 02-09-04 at 02:23 PM.
Gerry P. is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 02:41 PM
  #13  
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: OOOOOlathe
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Re: Alice in Wonderland - Widescreen?

EDIT

And not to be a jerk or anything, but if you collect DVDs, knowing a little something about the history of widescreen can be very helpful when shopping. [/B][/QUOTE]

I do generally know exactly what I'm buying if out looking for a movie. I didn't know/care that this came out, my wife just mentioned it after seeing the commercial. I started the thread after visiting a couple of places. Also, I don't buy movies to collect, I only buy movies I really enjoy, or think I'll watch time and time again. I could care less is someone else likes my "collection"
ESUguy is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 02:53 PM
  #14  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Triangle, NC, USA
Posts: 9,415
Received 82 Likes on 70 Posts
I would think that barring some sort of knowledge that osmosed into the OP's head, or that was implanted at birth via some sort of cybernetic linkup, he may not be aware of the yearly changes that occur with regards to Aspect Ratios of the silver screen. Failing that, he came and asked a question the one place where he KNEW he could get an answer, and HOPED he wouldn't get jumped on. One out of two ain't bad, I guess.
Not everyone was born with massive amounts of movie trivia in their heads, and not everyone has had an interest or a need to answer specific questions about 'What happened to Cinemascope in 1951?'
tonyc3742 is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 03:50 PM
  #15  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FYI - there was a previous thread about it here
CheapBastid is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 03:53 PM
  #16  
AOD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Bruce Campbell invented the internet...and pants.
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Holy cow. I can't believe the way you guys are treating this long-time member. All he wanted to do was ask a simple question and get a simple answer. This thread should have ended with DVD Josh's answer, but no, some of you had to add your 2 cents to pad your thread count up. Next time why don't you help a fellow member out instead of belittling him (her). If they did a search and happened to miss the thread they were looking for (yes, some threads are VERY long), point them in the right direction (without adding "not to treat you like a NOOB"). I see this time and time again in numerous threads and its dis-heartening. To think, he even apologized in advance! And no, not everyone knows when the different aspect ratios started being used.

Last edited by AOD; 02-09-04 at 03:55 PM.
AOD is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 03:58 PM
  #17  
Moderator
 
Groucho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 71,383
Received 122 Likes on 84 Posts
Come on guys. 1951 is right on the cusp of widescreen films. I think it's a reasonable question.
Groucho is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 04:01 PM
  #18  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Docking Bay 94
Posts: 14,259
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by Gerry P.
And not to be a jerk or anything, but if you collect DVDs, knowing a little something about the history of widescreen can be very helpful when shopping.
And the first step towards "knowing a little something" is asking questions.

Which is exactly what he did. Now he knows.


Dear Lord, some people here act like they were BORN knowing everything there is to know about film.
bboisvert is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 04:15 PM
  #19  
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: OOOOOlathe
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jesus, you act like it's a tragedy that I didn't know something about a film about which I don't even care. Get over it.
ESUguy is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 04:44 PM
  #20  
AOD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Bruce Campbell invented the internet...and pants.
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually, ESUguy, the last couple of us are sticking up for you.
AOD is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 05:50 PM
  #21  
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lady and the Tramp was the first w/s release.
Bagheera is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 08:57 PM
  #22  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: You have moved into a dark place. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Bagheera
Lady and the Tramp was the first w/s release.
Not true. The first widescreen release was "The Robe" (1954).

L&tT was the first WS from Disney, though.
jough is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 09:24 PM
  #23  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: In my secret underground lair, plotting to TAKE OVER THE WORLD!!! Bwuaaahahahaha!!
Posts: 4,590
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Here is my post from the original thread, which I thought was courteous & helpful (to toot my own horn ) and pointed out some of the problems determining OAR on Disney DVDs...
Originally posted by littlefuzzy
Going back to the original reason for this thread...

Looking at the back of my Alice in Wonderland 2-disc set, all I see is "Fullscreen (1.33:1)" and given Disney's track record, I might be concerned that they DID chop it up into a P&S version, if not for this thread and other information.

Unfortunately, Disney seems to be one of the few companies that don't print detailed aspect ratio information on their cases, or even the year the film was made, which could show whether a film was made before widescreen became standard.

For instance, the Singin' in the Rain 2-disc set from Warner Bros has this (probably referring to the movie and a documentary): "Standard Version presented in a format preserving the aspect ratio of their original theatrical/television exhibitions."

While Warner Bros doesn't list a year on the case for this title, they DO have a copyright date (Singin' in the Rain © 1951 Turner Entertainment Co.) which, even in the absence of aspect ratio information, would tell me that this film was probably NOT filmed in widescreen.
littlefuzzy is offline  
Old 02-10-04, 04:07 AM
  #24  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by bboisvert
And the first step towards "knowing a little something" is asking questions.

Which is exactly what he did. Now he knows.

Dear Lord, some people here act like they were BORN knowing everything there is to know about film.
When I wrote "if you collect DVDs, knowing a little something about the history of widescreen can be very helpful when shopping" I was merely responding to the statement "Why the hell would this be obvious? I had absolutely no idea exactly what year the movie came out. Besides, why do I even care when they started using various aspect ratios." -- A reasonable response, if I say so myself.

Sorry I raised your ire. Moving along.
Gerry P. is offline  
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.