Has your "vision" of your DVD collection changed recently?
#101
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Woodbridge, Virginia
Originally posted by Artman
What happens when/if your tastes and preferences change? Do you keep everything and let it collect dust or admit it no longer appeals to you and part ways with it? This is basically where I'm coming from.
What happens when/if your tastes and preferences change? Do you keep everything and let it collect dust or admit it no longer appeals to you and part ways with it? This is basically where I'm coming from.
#102
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally posted by Artman
I think its pretty normal to make a purchase on impulse and regret it later. Its easy to get caught up in the marketing and promo hype at times. Happens to the best of us.
I think its pretty normal to make a purchase on impulse and regret it later. Its easy to get caught up in the marketing and promo hype at times. Happens to the best of us.
Of course this is all based on my college Psychology class, so take it for what it's worth . . .
#103
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by celluloidwisdom
Me, I wait for my tastes or preferences to change yet again, then I blow off the dust and voila! -- there's the film I am once again interested in, happily nestled in its alphabetized splendor there on my shelf. No fuss, no muss.
Me, I wait for my tastes or preferences to change yet again, then I blow off the dust and voila! -- there's the film I am once again interested in, happily nestled in its alphabetized splendor there on my shelf. No fuss, no muss.
#104
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Woodbridge, Virginia
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Has your "vision" of your DVD collection changed recently
Originally posted by DVD-ho78(DTS)
I apologize if I offended you. I did say "You have said on more than one occasion that someone isn't a collector if they don't buy to complete a collection right?" I was asking you not quoting you. I should have went back and retrieved the quote you provided. That was the one I was referring to with the most emphasis. When I quoted you I did so in the bottom two paragraphs.
Basically you are saying you're more of a collector than those that dispose of DVDs in large amounts or with regularity? I obviously want to possess DVDs but I have to have a means of finding those I which to do so. I might not just sell off 100 DVDs at once just to dispose of them but I still have the option to do so as does anyone else. You can respond to my other comments I quoted you on from my previous post if you would like.
Either way, you can "possess" movies you think are bad and I'll "possess" movies I think are good. If you feel you're more of a collector for doing so then so be it. I'll just think that is assinine and leave it at that. I mean I do "collect DVD's. Within DVD's, there are sub-categories which I collect. I also collect certain directors. This is all part of one collection." I just don't own them all but instead the ones I like. That's my collection.
I apologize if I offended you. I did say "You have said on more than one occasion that someone isn't a collector if they don't buy to complete a collection right?" I was asking you not quoting you. I should have went back and retrieved the quote you provided. That was the one I was referring to with the most emphasis. When I quoted you I did so in the bottom two paragraphs.
Basically you are saying you're more of a collector than those that dispose of DVDs in large amounts or with regularity? I obviously want to possess DVDs but I have to have a means of finding those I which to do so. I might not just sell off 100 DVDs at once just to dispose of them but I still have the option to do so as does anyone else. You can respond to my other comments I quoted you on from my previous post if you would like.
Either way, you can "possess" movies you think are bad and I'll "possess" movies I think are good. If you feel you're more of a collector for doing so then so be it. I'll just think that is assinine and leave it at that. I mean I do "collect DVD's. Within DVD's, there are sub-categories which I collect. I also collect certain directors. This is all part of one collection." I just don't own them all but instead the ones I like. That's my collection.
#105
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: on a river in a kayak..where else?
Originally posted by Artman
I think its pretty normal to make a purchase on impulse and regret it later. Its easy to get caught up in the marketing and promo hype at times.
I think its pretty normal to make a purchase on impulse and regret it later. Its easy to get caught up in the marketing and promo hype at times.
#106
Retired
Originally posted by EPKJ
No, it is not normal to do this with a film one does not want to own. My impulse buys are of films I want which become instant priorities because of a reduced price.
No, it is not normal to do this with a film one does not want to own. My impulse buys are of films I want which become instant priorities because of a reduced price.

It's normal because many people just blind buy movies, rather than going to the theater or renting.
I don't think the guys saying people buy films they know they don't want to own, but rather people just end up with DVDs of films they don't want to own after watching them, or when their tastes change, etc.
#107
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Florida
Originally posted by gutwrencher
EVERYONE is different and very seldom are 2 collections the same. similar maybe...but not identical. this is what makes sharing our collections through links so cool. I'd say about 50 or more discs in my library are there because of other member's collection or something as simple as a post in a thread.
EVERYONE is different and very seldom are 2 collections the same. similar maybe...but not identical. this is what makes sharing our collections through links so cool. I'd say about 50 or more discs in my library are there because of other member's collection or something as simple as a post in a thread.

If I ever need something new to check out (horror in particular) your list is a good place to get some ideas.

There are several members here whose lists have come in handy.
#108
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Woodbridge, Virginia
Originally posted by Josh Hinkle
If it wasn't "normal" there wouldn't be a highly active DVD exchange forum here. 'Nuff said.
It's normal because many people just blind buy movies, rather than going to the theater or renting.
I don't think the guys saying people buy films they know they don't want to own, but rather people just end up with DVDs of films they don't want to own after watching them, or when their tastes change, etc.
If it wasn't "normal" there wouldn't be a highly active DVD exchange forum here. 'Nuff said.

It's normal because many people just blind buy movies, rather than going to the theater or renting.
I don't think the guys saying people buy films they know they don't want to own, but rather people just end up with DVDs of films they don't want to own after watching them, or when their tastes change, etc.
#109
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Right behind you.
Originally posted by Artman
LOL! Well, I guess i'm just an impatient guy. I reeeaaally dont see myself staring at my DVD's a few yrs from now thinking "Boy I wish I still had Godzilla or Armageddon..."
LOL! Well, I guess i'm just an impatient guy. I reeeaaally dont see myself staring at my DVD's a few yrs from now thinking "Boy I wish I still had Godzilla or Armageddon..."
Ironically, I'm now regretting having gotten rid of it, as I'd like to write a paper on GODZILLA's aggressively internationalist political worldview -- evidenced by its rather heavy-handed depiction of both the environmental movement (and NGOs in general) and foreign operatives as intellectualist and heroic (personified in the characters played by Matthew Broderick and Jean Reno, respectively) -- compared with its cartoonish depiction of nationalism, represented by a US military revealed as a collection of hapless, aggressive buffoons with more firepower than smarts.
But alas, now I can't write that paper, because I no longer have the film for reference.
And the world of cultural studies is poorer for it.
#110
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: on a river in a kayak..where else?
Originally posted by EPKJ
How often do your tastes change? If they do change, how often is this likely to narrow your interests as opposed to broadening them?
How often do your tastes change? If they do change, how often is this likely to narrow your interests as opposed to broadening them?
#111
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Indiana
Originally posted by celluloidwisdom
I've been noticing a tiresome trend in recent posts wherein people who've decided to purge chunks from their libraries want to be congratulated for their turn toward "quality" over "quantity" -- the implication being that those with larger collections are somehow incapable of refinement and are simply hording titles to pad their collections. This pose strikes me as not a little bit defensive, to be honest, and quite presumptuous, to boot.
Let's face it: the size of a person's library does not necessarily correlate to a person's tastes or discernment (after all, you can find plenty of tiny, pared-down collections that are every bit as crappy now as they were before they were whittled down into smaller, less fragrant droppings).
Still, I could care less what anyone else has in his/her personal film library. In my case, I've included the link to my collection for those who (for whatever their reasons) might find it useful to peruse. Like Yakuza Bengoshi (above), I routinely scan the collections of those posters who seem knowledgeable about film looking for titles that I may not otherwise come across.
That's why I'm here, afterall...
I've been noticing a tiresome trend in recent posts wherein people who've decided to purge chunks from their libraries want to be congratulated for their turn toward "quality" over "quantity" -- the implication being that those with larger collections are somehow incapable of refinement and are simply hording titles to pad their collections. This pose strikes me as not a little bit defensive, to be honest, and quite presumptuous, to boot.
Let's face it: the size of a person's library does not necessarily correlate to a person's tastes or discernment (after all, you can find plenty of tiny, pared-down collections that are every bit as crappy now as they were before they were whittled down into smaller, less fragrant droppings).
Still, I could care less what anyone else has in his/her personal film library. In my case, I've included the link to my collection for those who (for whatever their reasons) might find it useful to peruse. Like Yakuza Bengoshi (above), I routinely scan the collections of those posters who seem knowledgeable about film looking for titles that I may not otherwise come across.
That's why I'm here, afterall...
#112
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Woodbridge, Virginia
Originally posted by celluloidwisdom
I had GODZILLA briefly (it was included in a lot I bought), but the film is so horrible (not the effects, mind you: those are quite good; but the story / writing / performances) that I quickly sold it off on eBay. My feeling at the time was that it diminished my library.
Ironically, I'm now regretting having gotten rid of it, as I'd like to write a paper on GODZILLA's aggressively internationalist political worldview -- evidenced by its rather heavy-handed depiction of both the environmental movement (and NGOs in general) and foreign operatives as intellectualist and heroic (personified in the characters played by Matthew Broderick and Jean Reno, respectively) -- compared with its cartoonish depiction of nationalism, represented by a US military revealed as a collection of hapless, aggressive buffoons with more firepower than smarts.
But alas, now I can't write that paper, because I no longer have the film for reference.
And the world of cultural studies is poorer for it.
I had GODZILLA briefly (it was included in a lot I bought), but the film is so horrible (not the effects, mind you: those are quite good; but the story / writing / performances) that I quickly sold it off on eBay. My feeling at the time was that it diminished my library.
Ironically, I'm now regretting having gotten rid of it, as I'd like to write a paper on GODZILLA's aggressively internationalist political worldview -- evidenced by its rather heavy-handed depiction of both the environmental movement (and NGOs in general) and foreign operatives as intellectualist and heroic (personified in the characters played by Matthew Broderick and Jean Reno, respectively) -- compared with its cartoonish depiction of nationalism, represented by a US military revealed as a collection of hapless, aggressive buffoons with more firepower than smarts.
But alas, now I can't write that paper, because I no longer have the film for reference.
And the world of cultural studies is poorer for it.
#113
Retired
Originally posted by EPKJ
How often do your tastes change? If they do change, how often is this likely to narrow your interests as opposed to broadening them?
How often do your tastes change? If they do change, how often is this likely to narrow your interests as opposed to broadening them?
I could see it more as going through a phase. Maybe you go on a "zombie movie phase" and buy a bunch of zombie movies, pretty much all you can find.
Then you snap out of it and have some DVDs you probably will never watch again.
#114
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: on a river in a kayak..where else?
Originally posted by Josh Hinkle
I could see it more as going through a phase. Maybe you go on a "zombie movie phase" and buy a bunch of zombie movies, pretty much all you can find.
Then you snap out of it and have some DVDs you probably will never watch again.
I could see it more as going through a phase. Maybe you go on a "zombie movie phase" and buy a bunch of zombie movies, pretty much all you can find.
Then you snap out of it and have some DVDs you probably will never watch again.
btw, I prefer "flesh-eater flicks".
#115
Suspended
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: You have moved into a dark place. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
I don't really collect DVDs as much as I collect the *movies.*
It's just that DVD is the first convenient and high-quality format to view the film. And I admit to loving special features - all of the documentaries, commentaries, etc. If VHS tapes had these features years ago and were priced as cheaply as DVD I probably would have bought more of them, but VHS wasn't really suited to the types of features that DVD offers.
I would personally like to have a copy on hand of every movie ever made. It would be nice if I could carry them all around with me in a smallish package that also had a screen that I could watch anywhere. I don't know what kind of storage capacity that would require, technologically, but it would be quite a lot.
That way I could watch any movie I wanted at any time I wanted.
People's DVD collections (for those who *collect* movies rather than just watch them once in awhile) are empowering - they give you choices to watch what you want rather than rely on television programming.
I've never sold a disc that wasn't replaced with a better version, but there are a couple of blind buys I would get rid of if I could get any decent money back for them. But most used DVD places around here only pay $4-5 a disc, maybe less for some of these titles, and for that little amount, it's worth it just to keep it in case I ever wanted to see it again, or just give it away to someone who expresses interest in it at some point.
It's just that DVD is the first convenient and high-quality format to view the film. And I admit to loving special features - all of the documentaries, commentaries, etc. If VHS tapes had these features years ago and were priced as cheaply as DVD I probably would have bought more of them, but VHS wasn't really suited to the types of features that DVD offers.
I would personally like to have a copy on hand of every movie ever made. It would be nice if I could carry them all around with me in a smallish package that also had a screen that I could watch anywhere. I don't know what kind of storage capacity that would require, technologically, but it would be quite a lot.
That way I could watch any movie I wanted at any time I wanted.
People's DVD collections (for those who *collect* movies rather than just watch them once in awhile) are empowering - they give you choices to watch what you want rather than rely on television programming.
I've never sold a disc that wasn't replaced with a better version, but there are a couple of blind buys I would get rid of if I could get any decent money back for them. But most used DVD places around here only pay $4-5 a disc, maybe less for some of these titles, and for that little amount, it's worth it just to keep it in case I ever wanted to see it again, or just give it away to someone who expresses interest in it at some point.
#116
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Right behind you.
Originally posted by jough
I would personally like to have a copy on hand of every movie ever made. It would be nice if I could carry them all around with me in a smallish package that also had a screen that I could watch anywhere. I don't know what kind of storage capacity that would require, technologically, but it would be quite a lot.
That way I could watch any movie I wanted at any time I wanted.
I would personally like to have a copy on hand of every movie ever made. It would be nice if I could carry them all around with me in a smallish package that also had a screen that I could watch anywhere. I don't know what kind of storage capacity that would require, technologically, but it would be quite a lot.
That way I could watch any movie I wanted at any time I wanted.
#117
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by brizz
Uhm, so 606 dvds is now a "Very Small Collection?"
although i will agree with your second piont....it is complete crap, and you should definately start selling them
Uhm, so 606 dvds is now a "Very Small Collection?" although i will agree with your second piont....it is complete crap, and you should definately start selling them
So far as selling them. I don't see it happening anytime soon.
#118
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Woodbridge, Virginia
Originally posted by Josh Hinkle
I haven't had it happen personally, but from these people cutting down their collections, it must happen some.
I could see it more as going through a phase. Maybe you go on a "zombie movie phase" and buy a bunch of zombie movies, pretty much all you can find.
Then you snap out of it and have some DVDs you probably will never watch again.
I haven't had it happen personally, but from these people cutting down their collections, it must happen some.
I could see it more as going through a phase. Maybe you go on a "zombie movie phase" and buy a bunch of zombie movies, pretty much all you can find.
Then you snap out of it and have some DVDs you probably will never watch again.
#119
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Woodbridge, Virginia
Re: Re: Re: Has your "vision" of your DVD collection changed recently?
Originally posted by gutwrencher
I'd say my taste has grown...but not changed. I grew up watching horror, thanks to my mom...god rest her soul. I've only loved horror more and more over the years. I still love the films I watched as a 10 year-old...and appreciate them even more, now. I cant think of one film, not one...that I liked years ago but hate now. now I just love the same old stuff but I'm discovering new stuff all the time. no...my tastes have not changed at all. wider? guilty.
I'd say my taste has grown...but not changed. I grew up watching horror, thanks to my mom...god rest her soul. I've only loved horror more and more over the years. I still love the films I watched as a 10 year-old...and appreciate them even more, now. I cant think of one film, not one...that I liked years ago but hate now. now I just love the same old stuff but I'm discovering new stuff all the time. no...my tastes have not changed at all. wider? guilty.
Last edited by EPKJ; 01-20-04 at 05:05 AM.
#120
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Re: Re: Re: Re: Has your "vision" of your DVD collection changed recently?
Originally posted by EPKJ
That is nonsense. Most members have not even responded to this thread. You have absolutely no basis for thinking that you represent the majority. Most collectors know what they are doing.
That is nonsense. Most members have not even responded to this thread. You have absolutely no basis for thinking that you represent the majority. Most collectors know what they are doing.
DJ
#121
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Woodbridge, Virginia
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Has your "vision" of your DVD collection changed recently?
Originally posted by djtoell
And what basis do you have for making statements about "most collectors"?
DJ
And what basis do you have for making statements about "most collectors"?
DJ
#122
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Has your "vision" of your DVD collection changed recently?
Originally posted by EPKJ
I am a collector. I have associated with collectors of all sorts for over 30 years. Most collectors know exactly what they are collecting and why. Perhaps you have no idea about what you collect and why you do so, but, I can assure you that that is not normal.
I am a collector. I have associated with collectors of all sorts for over 30 years. Most collectors know exactly what they are collecting and why. Perhaps you have no idea about what you collect and why you do so, but, I can assure you that that is not normal.
DJ
#123
Suspended
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: You have moved into a dark place. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
As a collector myself and having known innumerable collectors I can corroborate EPKJ's story: nearly every single collector has also been a student of the subject that interests them (fancy that) and has known a great deal about the things which they collect. It does, after all, stand to reason.
Generally those who pay too much for something that isn't as valuable as a collectable is mocked by the other collectors. "What? You paid $180 for the 'Evil Dead: Book of the Dead' edition on eBay? Why didn't you just go to Best Buy and get it for $30? Heck, if you need it that badly buy two or three when you're there."
I don't know how many of these forums you read, djtoell, but the DVD Talk membership, collectively, holds a staggering amount of knowledge on all aspects of DVD collecting, info about DVDs, upcoming DVDs, DVD features, editions, etc.
That you do not doesn't necessarily make you an object of derision - it just means that you cannot speak for the majority.
Generally those who pay too much for something that isn't as valuable as a collectable is mocked by the other collectors. "What? You paid $180 for the 'Evil Dead: Book of the Dead' edition on eBay? Why didn't you just go to Best Buy and get it for $30? Heck, if you need it that badly buy two or three when you're there."
I don't know how many of these forums you read, djtoell, but the DVD Talk membership, collectively, holds a staggering amount of knowledge on all aspects of DVD collecting, info about DVDs, upcoming DVDs, DVD features, editions, etc.
That you do not doesn't necessarily make you an object of derision - it just means that you cannot speak for the majority.
#124
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hero
Since this is my thread (
), I'll jump back in, only because I think EPKJ's thoughts on the subject are so far from my own.
I've "collected" lots of things in my life: sports cards, comics, action figures, shot glass, dvds, etc. I have 26 years of "collecting experience", so I think I'm on par with the arbitrary 30 year association requirement you state.
Collectors lose interest in things. I have friends who collected Magic (oh dear lord why) for years before stopping. This doesn't make them "false collectors", they just wanted to do something else.
Frankly, I think that my approach is the epitome of collection: I looked at what I had, decided it wasn't my "vision" any longer and decided to take a new direction. All that a collection is essentially (and is defined as) an accumulation. I'll take that one step further and say it is an accumlation of personal interests. *I* was no longer interested in collecting every movie I ever enjoyed on DVD, and I also did not see, personally, a huge amount of replay value for me. My interests shifted and along with it, my collection.
So basically, you and I fundamentally disagree with what a collection is, who a collector is, and what collecting is. And that's fine. But to say you know what's "normal" because you've been around like-minded people for a number of years is pretentious. I'm certain that if you met someone with a dissenting opinion (like me) you'd dismiss them as a lunatic, as you've done here.
All I'm saying is that just because your interests shift does not mean you are any less of a collector. As I stated, I think that shifting interests is, to me at least, the essense of collecting. You collected before DVDs, and you'll collect after DVDs and you'll be no less of a collector in my eyes.
I just want to leave you with this: there is perhaps nothing more personal to a person than his or her collection (and the reasons for keeping it). As such, you are in no position to say what is and what is not "normal".
(As a P.S., since message boards do not convey tone well, I say all of the above with courtesy in the spirt of friendly debate and haven't taken your comments otherwise).
), I'll jump back in, only because I think EPKJ's thoughts on the subject are so far from my own. I've "collected" lots of things in my life: sports cards, comics, action figures, shot glass, dvds, etc. I have 26 years of "collecting experience", so I think I'm on par with the arbitrary 30 year association requirement you state.
Collectors lose interest in things. I have friends who collected Magic (oh dear lord why) for years before stopping. This doesn't make them "false collectors", they just wanted to do something else.
Frankly, I think that my approach is the epitome of collection: I looked at what I had, decided it wasn't my "vision" any longer and decided to take a new direction. All that a collection is essentially (and is defined as) an accumulation. I'll take that one step further and say it is an accumlation of personal interests. *I* was no longer interested in collecting every movie I ever enjoyed on DVD, and I also did not see, personally, a huge amount of replay value for me. My interests shifted and along with it, my collection.
So basically, you and I fundamentally disagree with what a collection is, who a collector is, and what collecting is. And that's fine. But to say you know what's "normal" because you've been around like-minded people for a number of years is pretentious. I'm certain that if you met someone with a dissenting opinion (like me) you'd dismiss them as a lunatic, as you've done here.
All I'm saying is that just because your interests shift does not mean you are any less of a collector. As I stated, I think that shifting interests is, to me at least, the essense of collecting. You collected before DVDs, and you'll collect after DVDs and you'll be no less of a collector in my eyes.
I just want to leave you with this: there is perhaps nothing more personal to a person than his or her collection (and the reasons for keeping it). As such, you are in no position to say what is and what is not "normal".
(As a P.S., since message boards do not convey tone well, I say all of the above with courtesy in the spirt of friendly debate and haven't taken your comments otherwise).
#125
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Originally posted by jough
I don't know how many of these forums you read, djtoell, but the DVD Talk membership, collectively, holds a staggering amount of knowledge on all aspects of DVD collecting, info about DVDs, upcoming DVDs, DVD features, editions, etc.
That you do not doesn't necessarily make you an object of derision - it just means that you cannot speak for the majority.
I don't know how many of these forums you read, djtoell, but the DVD Talk membership, collectively, holds a staggering amount of knowledge on all aspects of DVD collecting, info about DVDs, upcoming DVDs, DVD features, editions, etc.
That you do not doesn't necessarily make you an object of derision - it just means that you cannot speak for the majority.
DJ



