LOTR trilogy VS. STAR WARS trilogy question
#52
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would tell George, "Sorry, but I don't own any of LOTR sets. You see, I'm in my 30's and the movies are OK, but I'm past the age where a fantasy movie can really capture my imagination like your original trilogy did." I thought LOTR was well made and "spectacular" but very hollow and contained little suspense. The good guys were all so good. The bad guys so bad. There was no "I am your father" type of twist. Everyone knows it is a trilogy filmed at once so that guarentees the survival of every major player, eliminating the treat of death in battle in the first two films. I'm sure if I was well versed in the book, it would make up for some of the shortcomings of the film, but I'm not so I've just got to go on the film's merits alone. I'm an adult and need more from a movie. That being said, the SWT is from a more innocent time and has massive nostalgia value that any movie you want to own has, not to mention effects more amazing than anything in LOTR for its time. I gasped when the Destroyer flew onto the screen in SW. I wanted to drive around in a landspeeder. LOTR was realistic, impressive, but not awe inspiring to me as a 30-something year old. So I'd make the trade for a Star Wars Trilogy SE in a second. That is if George would take something besides LOTR.
#53
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by westerbergrules
I would tell George, "Sorry, but I don't own any of LOTR sets. You see, I'm in my 30's and the movies are OK, but I'm past the age where a fantasy movie can really capture my imagination like your original trilogy did." I thought LOTR was well made and "spectacular" but very hollow and contained little suspense. The good guys were all so good. The bad guys so bad. There was no "I am your father" type of twist. Everyone knows it is a trilogy filmed at once so that guarentees the survival of every major player, eliminating the treat of death in battle in the first two films. I'm sure if I was well versed in the book, it would make up for some of the shortcomings of the film, but I'm not so I've just got to go on the film's merits alone. I'm an adult and need more from a movie. That being said, the SWT is from a more innocent time and has massive nostalgia value that any movie you want to own has, not to mention effects more amazing than anything in LOTR for its time. I gasped when the Destroyer flew onto the screen in SW. I wanted to drive around in a landspeeder. LOTR was realistic, impressive, but not awe inspiring to me as a 30-something year old. So I'd make the trade for a Star Wars Trilogy SE in a second. That is if George would take something besides LOTR.
I would tell George, "Sorry, but I don't own any of LOTR sets. You see, I'm in my 30's and the movies are OK, but I'm past the age where a fantasy movie can really capture my imagination like your original trilogy did." I thought LOTR was well made and "spectacular" but very hollow and contained little suspense. The good guys were all so good. The bad guys so bad. There was no "I am your father" type of twist. Everyone knows it is a trilogy filmed at once so that guarentees the survival of every major player, eliminating the treat of death in battle in the first two films. I'm sure if I was well versed in the book, it would make up for some of the shortcomings of the film, but I'm not so I've just got to go on the film's merits alone. I'm an adult and need more from a movie. That being said, the SWT is from a more innocent time and has massive nostalgia value that any movie you want to own has, not to mention effects more amazing than anything in LOTR for its time. I gasped when the Destroyer flew onto the screen in SW. I wanted to drive around in a landspeeder. LOTR was realistic, impressive, but not awe inspiring to me as a 30-something year old. So I'd make the trade for a Star Wars Trilogy SE in a second. That is if George would take something besides LOTR.
#55
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Atlanta, GA
I'd take the SW movies quicker than you can say 'Wookie'.
To claim that one is better than the other is ridiculous - while the acting in LOTR is better, the plot of Star Wars is far less muddled and much more focused. LOTR is spectacular and has raised trilogies' to the next level, but it is only a ghost of what Star Wars was and is.
Darth Vader, Lightsabres and the force are cultural icons. People will, believe it or not, forget the hoopla around LOTR in a few years and SW will still be there.
To claim that one is better than the other is ridiculous - while the acting in LOTR is better, the plot of Star Wars is far less muddled and much more focused. LOTR is spectacular and has raised trilogies' to the next level, but it is only a ghost of what Star Wars was and is.
Darth Vader, Lightsabres and the force are cultural icons. People will, believe it or not, forget the hoopla around LOTR in a few years and SW will still be there.
#56
Banned
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 6,154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: "Sitting on a beach, earning 20%"
Originally posted by Kerborus
People will, believe it or not, forget the hoopla around LOTR in a few years and SW will still be there.
People will, believe it or not, forget the hoopla around LOTR in a few years and SW will still be there.
Damn Right! Come and ask this question in 25 years and lets see what kind of answers we get.
#57
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Kerborus
People will, believe it or not, forget the hoopla around LOTR in a few years and SW will still be there.
People will, believe it or not, forget the hoopla around LOTR in a few years and SW will still be there.
I could say the same thing the other way around:
People will, believe it or not, have a place in their hearts for LOTR and forget about Star Wars in ten years.
What makes you right and me wrong?
#58
Banned
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 6,154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: "Sitting on a beach, earning 20%"
Originally posted by chucks888
People will, believe it or not, have a place in their hearts for LOTR and forget about Star Wars in ten years.
What makes you right and me wrong?
People will, believe it or not, have a place in their hearts for LOTR and forget about Star Wars in ten years.
What makes you right and me wrong?
LOTR may very well prove to be just as durable, but it has yet to be proven. Star Wars on the other hand has already proven itself.
Last edited by Pants; 01-09-04 at 05:02 PM.
#59
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That doesn't prove me wrong at all. I can't speak for everbody but Lucas has lost a lot of fans with the prequels. No matter how you may personally feel about these new episodes, you can't deny the fact that *many* people think they are awful (me included) I still love the original trilogy, but the new ones have left a "bad taste" so to speak. And depending on how good/bad Episode 3 is, Star Wars may continue to lose its luster.
"It's not like we will wake up tommorrow and the world will have turned their back on the film and no one will watch it anymore."
No of course not, but you are replying to a hypothetical statement that I stated to prove the ridiculous-ness of the post I was replying to. Do you think 'we will wake up tomorrow' and no one will watch LOTR anymore? It sure seems like it with your enthusiastic thumbs-up agreement with Kerborus.
Also for your information, the "proven durability and longevity" of The Lord of the Rings has lasted 50+ years, which makes you wrong.
"It's not like we will wake up tommorrow and the world will have turned their back on the film and no one will watch it anymore."
No of course not, but you are replying to a hypothetical statement that I stated to prove the ridiculous-ness of the post I was replying to. Do you think 'we will wake up tomorrow' and no one will watch LOTR anymore? It sure seems like it with your enthusiastic thumbs-up agreement with Kerborus.
Also for your information, the "proven durability and longevity" of The Lord of the Rings has lasted 50+ years, which makes you wrong.
Last edited by chucks888; 01-09-04 at 05:17 PM.
#60
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally posted by chucks888
Also for your information, the "proven durability and longevity" of The Lord of the Rings has lasted 50+ years, which makes you wrong.
Also for your information, the "proven durability and longevity" of The Lord of the Rings has lasted 50+ years, which makes you wrong.
#61
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Germany
Originally posted by chucks888
Also for your information, the "proven durability and longevity" of The Lord of the Rings has lasted 50+ years, which makes you wrong.
Also for your information, the "proven durability and longevity" of The Lord of the Rings has lasted 50+ years, which makes you wrong.
#62
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by RyoHazuki
The books are not the movies. Star Wars is more popular than LOTR.
The books are not the movies. Star Wars is more popular than LOTR.
But then again you are probably referring to the OT. Fine. Suppose they released the Original Trilogy this year on DVD as 3 individual releases- would those 3 sell more units than LOTR's previous two releases along with the upcoming ROTK? I'm not convinced.
#63
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally posted by chucks888
This is also only your opinion. Considering the box office performance of Episode 2, the 'popularity' of Star Wars may not be as high as you think.
But then again you are probably referring to the OT. Fine. Suppose they released the Original Trilogy this year on DVD as 3 individual releases- would those 3 sell more units than LOTR's previous two releases along with the upcoming ROTK? I'm not convinced.
This is also only your opinion. Considering the box office performance of Episode 2, the 'popularity' of Star Wars may not be as high as you think.
But then again you are probably referring to the OT. Fine. Suppose they released the Original Trilogy this year on DVD as 3 individual releases- would those 3 sell more units than LOTR's previous two releases along with the upcoming ROTK? I'm not convinced.
#64
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by RyoHazuki
Yes I think they would. Dvd sales dont equal popularity either.
Yes I think they would. Dvd sales dont equal popularity either.
And you're right, I guess more people buying a DVD so they can watch the movie doesn't make it more popular. What was I thinking.
#65
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Well I think the original intent of the thread has now been accomplished. 
But just to join in, I think what Star Wars had going for it was that there really was nothing after it for a long time to take it off people's minds. I mean, for the longest time, a fat guy was "Jabba". If you wanted to be a hero, you were "Luke". Any wise-guy type person was either "Yoda" or "Obi-Wan"(heck, even upto now). LOTR for the longest time was what I would call "under the radar". Yes, it was popular but it wasn't something that those who weren't into Fantasy really latched onto, but almost everyone latched onto Star Wars.
As for losing fans, you guys really think this happens? That some person actually goes, "I don't like Star Wars anymore. I'm not gonna watch it ever again." Cuz I criticize the prequels just as much as those who bash it that sometimes it's hard to determine which camp I'm in, but I know that in May 2005, I know where I'll be at midnight. I reeeaaaly think this "losing fans" phenomena is just an internet thing. Cuz every Halloween whenever I go to the mall, members of the 501st legion go around in groups, one's usually dressed as Vader with some Imperial guards and Storm Troopers with him(last year they actually had a Jango Fett) and people flock to them for pictures every year. Every year. It just puts a smile on my face when I see that.

But just to join in, I think what Star Wars had going for it was that there really was nothing after it for a long time to take it off people's minds. I mean, for the longest time, a fat guy was "Jabba". If you wanted to be a hero, you were "Luke". Any wise-guy type person was either "Yoda" or "Obi-Wan"(heck, even upto now). LOTR for the longest time was what I would call "under the radar". Yes, it was popular but it wasn't something that those who weren't into Fantasy really latched onto, but almost everyone latched onto Star Wars.
As for losing fans, you guys really think this happens? That some person actually goes, "I don't like Star Wars anymore. I'm not gonna watch it ever again." Cuz I criticize the prequels just as much as those who bash it that sometimes it's hard to determine which camp I'm in, but I know that in May 2005, I know where I'll be at midnight. I reeeaaaly think this "losing fans" phenomena is just an internet thing. Cuz every Halloween whenever I go to the mall, members of the 501st legion go around in groups, one's usually dressed as Vader with some Imperial guards and Storm Troopers with him(last year they actually had a Jango Fett) and people flock to them for pictures every year. Every year. It just puts a smile on my face when I see that.
#66
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally posted by chucks888
They could, I'm not saying they couldn't. But you think they would I think they wouldn't.
And you're right, I guess more people buying a DVD so they can watch the movie doesn't make it more popular. What was I thinking.
They could, I'm not saying they couldn't. But you think they would I think they wouldn't.
And you're right, I guess more people buying a DVD so they can watch the movie doesn't make it more popular. What was I thinking.
#67
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Up State NY
Originally posted by chucks888
Considering the box office performance of Episode 2, the 'popularity' of Star Wars may not be as high as you think.
Considering the box office performance of Episode 2, the 'popularity' of Star Wars may not be as high as you think.
#68
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by RyoHazuki
The LOTR movies hit in the prime of the dvd market. Star Wars was released in '77 when dvds were far far away. Star Wars is more popular. I dont know how you can doubt that. Its part of our culture. People know what a wookie is. People know what a jedi is. Most don't know an orc or a ringwraith.
The LOTR movies hit in the prime of the dvd market. Star Wars was released in '77 when dvds were far far away. Star Wars is more popular. I dont know how you can doubt that. Its part of our culture. People know what a wookie is. People know what a jedi is. Most don't know an orc or a ringwraith.
Yes, SW came out a long time ago. And it was 'popular' long time ago. If Star Wars was more 'popular' than LOTR right now, it would sell more DVDs.
Originally posted by cactusoly
over $300 million domestic is poor boxoffice?
over $300 million domestic is poor boxoffice?
#69
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally posted by chucks888
Uh, people know what a hobbit is. People know "Gandalf".
Uh, people know what a hobbit is. People know "Gandalf".
Yes, SW came out a long time ago. And it was 'popular' long time ago. If Star Wars was more 'popular' than LOTR right now, it would sell more DVDs.
A. Never really find out, if Lucas doesn't release the CLASSIC OT (which *is* the version stipulated by the thread)
B. Have a more reasonable discussion on by this time next year if the rumored release of the SE is true.

I think 3 pages of rehashed "my movie can beat up your movie" is plenty. Closing thread. - Static




