Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Archives > Archives > DVD Talk Archive
Reload this Page >

Pirates Full & Widescreen?

Community
Search

Pirates Full & Widescreen?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-03 | 06:13 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Sweden
I can't imagine them selling so few dvds that this won't pay off. Producing both widescreen and fullscreen editions must cost a whole lot more than just one edition, and I don't think there are gonna be so many people returning their films that it's not gonna be profitable.
Yocke is offline  
Old 12-04-03 | 06:16 PM
  #27  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
this is the way it should be...people NEED to watch Widescreen...good call Disney...for a change...
QuiGonJosh is offline  
Old 12-04-03 | 06:30 PM
  #28  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: USA
Originally posted by GMLSKIS
Not happy about being forced to buy 2.35:1 which I hate but probably will buy anyway. They screwed up by not putting out wide and full in my opinion.
You should have your DVD buying card revoked immediatly!!!! Baliff whack his.....!
Frank S is offline  
Old 12-04-03 | 08:03 PM
  #29  
Alan Smithee's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer & TOAT Winner
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,107
Received 462 Likes on 345 Posts
From: USA
When DVD was conceived, the idea was to have BOTH widescreen AND pan n scan on the SAME DISC. If space won't allow that then they can boot the pan n scan version, but this separate release crap has got to STOP!
Alan Smithee is offline  
Old 12-04-03 | 10:34 PM
  #30  
milo bloom's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 18,992
Received 1,664 Likes on 1,204 Posts
From: Chicago suburbs
Originally posted by Alan Smithee
When DVD was conceived, the idea was to have BOTH widescreen AND pan n scan on the SAME DISC. If space won't allow that then they can boot the pan n scan version, but this separate release crap has got to STOP!
I hear you man. Warner seems to be the worst offender with this, and everytime I see those separate releases, I can't help but think that's money they could have used for something like clearing up BladeRunner's legal issues. Or even back in the day, when BladeRunner was first released, instead of a fullscreen version, they could have put the voiceover version on the other side.

Fullscreen DVDs are almost an insult to the advances that DVD has brought to movie watching. Disney is definitely in the right on this one.
milo bloom is offline  
Old 12-05-03 | 06:43 AM
  #31  
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: R2
Originally posted by Alan Smithee
When DVD was conceived, the idea was to have BOTH widescreen AND pan n scan on the SAME DISC
I disagree, I think this feature was added to attract 'certain people' who would otherwise not buy the film. DVD was conceived for film lovers.
aam1 is offline  
Old 12-05-03 | 07:24 AM
  #32  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,778
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
From: Midwest
Originally posted by aam1
I disagree, I think this feature was added to attract 'certain people' who would otherwise not buy the film. DVD was conceived for film lovers.
I agree
steebo777 is offline  
Old 12-06-03 | 05:31 PM
  #33  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Central Hoosierland
Originally posted by QuiGonJosh
this is the way it should be...people NEED to watch Widescreen...good call Disney...for a change...


Now, where's my widescreen Snow Dogs ??







indianajdp is offline  
Old 12-06-03 | 05:59 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My reaction was the opposite. I just picked this up, and seeing only one version of a Disney title was sure that it must be P&S. I read the box multiple times to make sure that wasn't the case.
Trinitron is offline  
Old 12-12-03 | 02:18 AM
  #35  
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: R2
Strikes me as a bit odd that most of the deleted scenes are in a much squarer ratio than the film.
aam1 is offline  
Old 12-12-03 | 02:44 AM
  #36  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Portland, Oregon
Originally posted by DonnachaOne
Ergyu, no, he's not joking. GMLSKIS has the distinction of being just about the only person on here who doesn't appreciate OAR as much as everyone else here.

In this case, it's not an issue worth pursuing.
Thanks for Clarifying. In that case, yes, nuts is the answer.
Ergyu is offline  
Old 12-12-03 | 12:43 PM
  #37  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,602
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by Matt Millheiser
Funny, when they're releasing a MAJOR release in OAR only, they're Disney, not Di$ney. Fascinating.
Disney is a business, so it must of made business to release in wide only.

I believe 98% of the people do not care if it is released in wide only, but there would be a loud out cry from the DVD junkies if it was release in 4:3 only.
Iron_Giant is offline  
Old 12-13-03 | 11:19 PM
  #38  
Defiant1's Avatar
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I read that POTC sold 11M copies in its first week, the most sold for a live-action movie ever. Since these were all widescreen DVDs, I find this very interesting.

Democracy's overrated - I say the studios should release all movies in OAR only and ignore the wishes of the masses.
Defiant1 is offline  
Old 12-14-03 | 09:34 AM
  #39  
JimRochester's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 18,060
Received 68 Likes on 31 Posts
From: Rochester, NY. USA
Three cheers for Disney. I don't criticize anyone for their preferences, after all, it's their hard earned money. But I do find it ironic, that people can tolerate the 1.85:1 ratio but not the 2.35:1. What makes it not make sense, is that so many 1.85:1 movies are open matte when they are full frame, vs. most 2.35:1 are P&S's to achieve FF. So in effect they are willing to tolerate the P&S more than open matte.

"Pan and Scan is an abomination and should be banned" - Richard Fleisher, director Tora Tora Tora
JimRochester is offline  
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.