Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Archives > Archives > DVD Talk Archive
Reload this Page >

Poll: Warner Bros. and the "evil" Looney Tunes?

Community
Search
View Poll Results: What should Warner Bros. do with the "politically incorrect" Looney Tunes?
Release them with the rest of the cartoons . . . everyone should see them!
58
47.15%
I can't believe they were made to begin with . . . keep them for historical record, but certainly don't release them.
5
4.07%
Release a special collection of the "questionable" toons for those who are interested . . .
59
47.97%
Other . . . ? (elaborate below)
1
0.81%
Voters: 123. You may not vote on this poll

Poll: Warner Bros. and the "evil" Looney Tunes?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-03 | 11:45 AM
  #26  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,147
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by garolo
What do 40 year olds have to do with these toons? And WB could not "destroy" the prints. They may own the rights to them (for now) but they don't have in their possesion all of the copies in existence.
Its only the 30-40 year old people that are complaining about not having these. You won't hear some kid asking for them.

Yes Warner might not own every copy but they are the ones that would create the DVDs. Who cares if Joe Smoe has the cartoon on video, but if Warner doesn't own a copy, they can't put it out.
resinrats is offline  
Old 12-03-03 | 11:52 AM
  #27  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 18,537
Received 444 Likes on 313 Posts
From: Formerly known as Groucho AND Bandoman/Death Moans, Iowa
Originally posted by dtcarson
I don't know what will happen with the gay marriage things, but that's another major shift--if gay marriages are institutionalized in all 50 states, should we ban movies where gays are ostracized?
I think the difference with films where gays are ostracized is that in these films they are rarely shown in a negative light. Gay people are show as otracized in "Philadelphia" and "Bent," but no one would say that it was intended to portray homosexuals in a negative way. Not to hijack this thread, but are there any movies that portray homosexuals in a negative way?
majorjoe23 is offline  
Old 12-03-03 | 12:16 PM
  #28  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Exit 10, NJ
Originally posted by resinrats
Its only the 30-40 year old people that are complaining about not having these. You won't hear some kid asking for them.

Yes Warner might not own every copy but they are the ones that would create the DVDs. Who cares if Joe Smoe has the cartoon on video, but if Warner doesn't own a copy, they can't put it out.
You won't hear a kid asking for them because a kid doesn't know about them. LT and MM were not made for kids. Many of the "complainers" are baby boomers (mostly 50+) and grew up on a steady diet of Looney Tunes. The war propaganda toons used to be shown regularly on TV.
Some of us are completists. Some just love anything from Termite Terrace. We complain because it's something we can't have (at least for now). No one that I know, whines about it.

IIRC, Coal Black is without a doubt, Clampett's masterpiece of animation. Yes it politically incorrect and offensive by today's mores. But unlike Amos and Andy, black actors voiced the characters. I don't know if that makes a difference to caricatures but it does lend credence to the notion that the intent was not malicious or exploitive.

I happen to own these cartoons on VHS. They are really grainy, nth generation copies. I would love to have a digital copy of them. But that will probably not happen soon.

Once these cartoons pass into the public domain, that is the copyrights expire, anyone is free to sell it. Copyrights don't last forever.

And if you want to read some whining, take a look at any Star Wars thread.

Last edited by garolo; 12-03-03 at 12:19 PM.
garolo is offline  
Old 12-03-03 | 01:07 PM
  #29  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,147
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I'm sure Warners will do something so they don't loose the copywrites.
resinrats is offline  
Old 12-03-03 | 02:26 PM
  #30  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Chicago
Originally posted by RyoHazuki7
Take them all and throw them into the bonfire.
Sprechen Sie Deutsch?
Scorpio is offline  
Old 12-04-03 | 07:35 AM
  #31  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Exit 10, NJ
Originally posted by resinrats
I'm sure Warners will do something so they don't loose the copywrites.
I'm not a lawyer but I play one on TV.

Film copyrights expire after 90 years after the initial release. They could expire sooner if not renewed regularly. Music copyrights are generally kept in sync with the film and story but I believe 70 years is the limit on music. So around 2034, most of the WB WWII propaganda and race cartoons will be available for use and sale by PD distributors. But DVD and maybe even HD-DVD will have gone the way of the kinescope by then.

And I don't mean to get too pedantic but copywrite(r) is someone who writes advertising or publicity releases. A copyright is the right or entitlement to reproduce or sell a musical, written or otherwise artistic piece of work.
garolo is offline  
Old 12-04-03 | 10:50 AM
  #32  
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: R2
Perhaps they should release them all as a set also containing documentaries explaining why they feel they are offensive now and why they felt they were not offensive before.
aam1 is offline  
Old 12-04-03 | 01:09 PM
  #33  
PatrickMcCart's Avatar
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Georgia, USA
It's the 40-year-olds who want to see these cartoons!

It's the pinheads who want supress anything that is slightly offensive that are the problem. (Of course, we can't have Coal Black, but it's OK to have someone shot to bits or use the F-word 287 times)
PatrickMcCart is offline  
Old 12-04-03 | 04:31 PM
  #34  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,445
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 16 Posts
From: A secret rebel stronghold in the Republic of San Marcos
It's the pinheads who want supress anything that is slightly offensive that are the problem.
I would hardly classify a piece of work called Coal Black and de Sebben Dwarfs as "slightly" offensive. Lets be realistic, folks, WB would never actively call attention to an embarrasing era of their history.

It'd be like Volkswagon releasing a special, limited edition "built with slave labor" New Beetle.
Fielding Mellish is offline  
Old 12-04-03 | 05:18 PM
  #35  
PatrickMcCart's Avatar
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Georgia, USA
I would hardly classify a piece of work called Coal Black and de Sebben Dwarfs as "slightly" offensive. Lets be realistic, folks, WB would never actively call attention to an embarrasing era of their history.
It's more raunchy than offensive, anyways.

How is it part of an embarassing era in their history? Coal Black was produced in the 1940's... Warner Bros. was releasing some of their best stuff in the first half of that decade.

If we encourage WB in releasing these objectionable shorts, we'll see them. If we keep applying our modern viewpoints, we won't.
PatrickMcCart is offline  
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.