DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   DVD Talk Archive (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/dvd-talk-archive-54/)
-   -   why not release separate WS and FS version of Finding Nemo? (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/dvd-talk-archive/322821-why-not-release-separate-ws-fs-version-finding-nemo.html)

dbmottle 10-09-03 07:12 AM

why not release separate WS and FS version of Finding Nemo?
 
This seems like it would make more sense as a DTS-ES track could be added. Anybody agree?

PalmerJoss 10-09-03 07:22 AM

I actually like the idea of combining both--it gives the viewer the option of seeing it either way without paying any extra $. It might even give someone who's never watched a movie in WS the opportunity to, and maybe show them what they've been missing.

Static Cling 10-09-03 07:55 AM

From a financial perspective, I think it makes more sense to them. They don't have to track FS discs and WS discs... whatever they put out, either camp will be interested in.

Plus, it's Pixar. I'm sure the DD 5.1 sound will be just fine.

wordtoyamotha 10-09-03 10:18 AM

For those of us that order a lot of discs via internet, having both versions in one edition is infinitely less troublesome. E-tailers LOVE to ship FS copies to people that ordered WS.

Groucho 10-09-03 10:23 AM


Originally posted by Static Cling
Plus, it's Pixar. I'm sure the DD 5.1 sound will be just fine.
YOUR WRONG DTS IS LIKE LISTENING TO A CLOUD AND ANYONE WHO THINKS DIFFERENTLY IS A *********.

PixyJunket 10-09-03 10:26 AM

I hope nothing is censored! -eek-

WillySi7 10-09-03 10:33 AM

im sure another reason for this is because children may be more apt to watching a fullscreen version ("why the black bars daddy") and so you give an option to both preferences... it was the same for monsters inc. even though i would agree to seperate them to possibly add a 5.1 EX score, i remember monsters having exceptional video and audio quality. hopefully the nemo disc will turn out the same if not better..

Rypro 525 10-09-03 10:35 AM

if its anything like the theaters, this will be one of the most aggressive dvd's ever with side to side panning and surround activity since the fish are constantly swimming around the screen.

Kal-El 10-09-03 10:43 AM

Cuz Pixar's not greedy that way.

Giles 10-09-03 11:11 AM

well, the UK has the common sense to drop the full/widescreen thing and add a DTS track on their Pixar titles (sans Toy Story 1 and 2) ... the full/widescreen option is a waste of space IMO.

Hokeyboy 10-09-03 11:17 AM

This all goe$ to $how how Di$ney i$, once again, trying to $crew the con$umer out of their hard earned dollar$!!!! No other $tudio would ever attempt to even charge a $ingle red cent for their DVD$... but Ei$ner ha$ naked picture$ of all the other $tudio heads and $o they were blackmailed into following $uit!!

DVD$ would have been free if it weren't for DI$NEY!!!!!! :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

And to answer your question, I'm sure the DD 5.1 track will be fine enough.

MEJHarrison 10-09-03 01:00 PM


Originally posted by WillySi7
im sure another reason for this is because children may be more apt to watching a fullscreen version ("why the black bars daddy") and so you give an option to both preferences...
My kids have never, ever questioned the decision to watch widescreen. Ok, the youngest just turned one and doesn't say much beyond DA, but the six year old has never seemed to notice and Lord know he questions everything else under the sun. Do kids really do this? Or do only older kids ask why?

milo bloom 10-09-03 01:00 PM


Originally posted by Giles
well, the UK has the common sense to drop the full/widescreen thing and add a DTS track on their Pixar titles (sans Toy Story 1 and 2) ... the full/widescreen option is a waste of space IMO.
:up: :up: :up:

It's the year 2003, can we get rid of this modifiying films to fit some preconceived notion of the shape of our furniture yet?

Groucho 10-09-03 01:09 PM


Originally posted by Giles
well, the UK has the common sense to drop the full/widescreen thing and add a DTS track on their Pixar titles (sans Toy Story 1 and 2) ... the full/widescreen option is a waste of space IMO.
Bear in mind that the market penetration of widescreen televisions is much higher in the UK.

WillieTheShakes 10-09-03 01:14 PM


Originally posted by WillySi7
im sure another reason for this is because children may be more apt to watching a fullscreen version ("why the black bars daddy") and so you give an option to both preferences...
Not if you bring em up right.
My four year old son will always, always opt for ws when it's an option (Bug's Life and Jimmy Neutron are the first ones to come to mind). I asked him why at one point and he said "Because I get to see more of the picture".

<wiping away tear>

I'm so proud...

DonnachaOne 10-09-03 01:15 PM


Originally posted by WillySi7
im sure another reason for this is because children may be more apt to watching a fullscreen version ("why the black bars daddy") and so you give an option to both preferences...
At this point, you make them watch OAR. Don't raise fools.

PixyJunket 10-09-03 01:25 PM

Wow.. just, wow.

TylerDurden_73 10-09-03 01:44 PM


Originally posted by WillieTheShakes
Not if you bring em up right.
My four year old son will always, always opt for ws when it's an option (Bug's Life and Jimmy Neutron are the first ones to come to mind). I asked him why at one point and he said "Because I get to see more of the picture".

<wiping away tear>

I'm so proud...

You are raising him well...I see harvard or yale in his future.

greatjedi 10-09-03 01:55 PM

I have a 4 year old and a 2 year old, and they have never ever complained about the black bars. In fact, I've never seen any little kid complain about widescreen. I've never understood why studios think it's so important to release kids movies in full frame. Kids are adaptable, it's the parents who have problems.

davidh777 10-09-03 02:37 PM

I was watching the Kim Possible DVD with my 6-year-old and comparing it to the episode we had taped from Disney Channel. She had a good time spotting all the stuff she could see on the sides that didn't appear on the TV broadcast version.

talemyn 10-09-03 03:42 PM


Originally posted by greatjedi
Kids are adaptable, it's the parents who have problems.
Sooooo true . . .

I have no kids of my own, but I work with a youth group and have movie nights for them from time-to-time. They love widesceen (or maybe they just love it on a 61" TV :) ). My parents, on the other hand, can't stand to watch widescreen.

How I ever came out normal, I'll never know. :D

bboisvert 10-09-03 03:59 PM

http://whacked.net/blog/archives/nemo.jpg

talemyn 10-09-03 04:09 PM


Originally posted by bboisvert
http://whacked.net/blog/archives/nemo.jpg
I love that picture . . . saw it a few weeks ago. rotfl

Jim 10-09-03 04:13 PM


Originally posted by greatjedi
I have a 4 year old and a 2 year old, and they have never ever complained about the black bars. In fact, I've never seen any little kid complain about widescreen. I've never understood why studios think it's so important to release kids movies in full frame. Kids are adaptable, it's the parents who have problems.
We have a 4 and a 6 year old and it's the exact same way. They never comment one way or the other. It's the grandparents we have to do the splainin' to.

slop101 10-09-03 05:13 PM

Actually Pixar always goes in and adds information on the top & bottom of the image for the fullscreen versions - they did this with Bugs Life, TS2 and Monsters Inc. So Bug's Life full-screen actually has more "picture" than the wide-screen. Natch.

I'm guessing they'll do the same thing here. It's not OAR, but it's a hell of a lot better than pan-n-scan.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.