The One and Only Blue Underground Thread
#201
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Originally posted by EPKJ
Since prior to this post you provided no sources, no one knew what you were talking about. That was the problem. Now you have provided a source. You should have done so to begin with.
Since prior to this post you provided no sources, no one knew what you were talking about. That was the problem. Now you have provided a source. You should have done so to begin with.
And no one knew what gutwrencher was talking about? I sure did. Please don't project your own lack of knowledge onto everyone else.
Finally, I never said that you could not discuss the matter. I said that it was unworthy of discussion. This has nothing to do with attempting to moderate anything.

It was a statement of fact. Unsubstantiated rumors are a waste of time
You may not feel that rumors are worth your time, but others do. If something posted here isn't worth your time, move on. Rumors will be discussed here, whether you like it or not. Please don't waste my time with your proclamations or what is and isn't worthy of discussion. It doesn't contribute anything to the conversation.
DJ
#202
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Originally posted by EPKJ
Obviously the people in that thread share my desire to have verifiable sources. Was Vincent attempting to be a moderator? No, he was requesting sourcing as was I.
Obviously the people in that thread share my desire to have verifiable sources. Was Vincent attempting to be a moderator? No, he was requesting sourcing as was I.
DJ
#203
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Woodbridge, Virginia
djtoell, let me make this very clear to you. I posted a one word response to gutwrencher's post. It read as follows:
Now that is a civil and rational question to ask. Gutwrencher later responded in a civil and rational manner. No problem. In between, you decided that you wanted to pick a fight. If you had not attacked my one word question, there would be no argument. What is your problem? You are arguing pointlessly, as my one word question was 100% valid and warranted. So why did you object to my asking, "Source?". What exactly was wrong with asking that? Why did you attack me for that? I really want to see how you can describe "Source?" as anything but a civil and rational question.
Source?
#204
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Originally posted by EPKJ
Now that is a civil and rational question to ask. Gutwrencher later responded in a civil and rational manner. No problem. In between, you decided that you wanted to pick a fight. If you had not attacked my one word question, there would be no argument.
Now that is a civil and rational question to ask. Gutwrencher later responded in a civil and rational manner. No problem. In between, you decided that you wanted to pick a fight. If you had not attacked my one word question, there would be no argument.
What is your problem? You are arguing pointlessly, as my one word question was 100% valid and warranted. So why did you object to my asking, "Source?".
What exactly was wrong with asking that? Why did you attack me for that?
Just move along. You're now making stuff up in order to defend yourself, so it's clearly time to cut your losses.
DJ
Last edited by djtoell; 01-12-04 at 06:37 PM.
#205
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Woodbridge, Virginia
Everything to which you refer would never have been posted if you had not attacked my one word post, "Source?". That is a fact. So, yes, I am for real. You started this whole argument by attacking that one word post. If you skip all the posts except my dialog with gutwrencher, there is no problem. Your saying that you didn't instigate a fight is belied by your posts. That is a fact. Live with it. Let me show you what started this so that people can see that you are the one making things up. Gutwrencher posted the following:
I responded as follows:
RichDB10 then posted:
I responded:
Note that this is all civil up to this point. Now you start the fight with the following:
Your post is sarcastic for no reason. You insult me for no reason. You offer no verifiable sources either. You simply resort to an appeal to authority, i.e. "just about every other horror board". That is what started the fight, your sarcastic response to civil and rational posts. That is reality. Live with it and move on yourself.
Originally posted by gutwrencher
from the Chiller convention:
BU has announced Argento's Four Flies On Grey Velvet and the remastered Zombie.
from the Chiller convention:
BU has announced Argento's Four Flies On Grey Velvet and the remastered Zombie.
Originally posted by EPKJ
Source?
Source?
Originally posted by RichDB10
Not knowing about the actual convention mentioned, but i would guess that if it wasn't Bill Lustig giving some kind of presentation then it would have been a Blue Underground representative.??..i could of course be totally wrong!
Not knowing about the actual convention mentioned, but i would guess that if it wasn't Bill Lustig giving some kind of presentation then it would have been a Blue Underground representative.??..i could of course be totally wrong!
Originally posted by EPKJ
Well, until this is sourced in a verifiable manner, this is an unsubstantiated rumor and unworthy of further discussion.
Well, until this is sourced in a verifiable manner, this is an unsubstantiated rumor and unworthy of further discussion.
Originally posted by djtoell
It was said in front of a big crowd by Bill Lustig at the Fangoria/Chiller Theatre Convention this past weekend. It is now being discussed by just about every horror board on the net. Pick any one at random to read multiple reports on it from people who attended. Is that "worthy" enough for you?
DJ
It was said in front of a big crowd by Bill Lustig at the Fangoria/Chiller Theatre Convention this past weekend. It is now being discussed by just about every horror board on the net. Pick any one at random to read multiple reports on it from people who attended. Is that "worthy" enough for you?
DJ
#206
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Originally posted by EPKJ
Everything to which you refer would never have been posted if you had not attacked my one word post, "Source?".
Everything to which you refer would never have been posted if you had not attacked my one word post, "Source?".
Stop lying already and move on. Anyone with a brain will have already figured out that you're just lying, anyway, so it's not as if you can suddenly make progress by lying even more.
Your post is sarcastic for no reason.
You insult me for no reason.
You offer no verifiable sources either.
That is what started the fight, your sarcastic response to civil and rational posts.
That is reality. Live with it and move on yourself.
Please, for the love of god, enough with the lies and the Twilight Zone version of reality. Please just cut it out and let the thread move along. This was a very productive thread until you declared that an on-topic post was "unworthy of further discussion." If you want to make up lies, just do it to yourself so that the rest of us can actually get on with the topic. It's a very exciting time for Blue Underground, and your childish antics are nothing more than an annoyance.
DJ
#209
Admin Emeritus
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,842
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
From: Texas, our Texas! All hail the mighty state!
Closing thread. I haven't read through this all the way yet, but right now, I'm agreeing with everyone who says that it's the job of the mods & admins to decide what topics are okay for discussion. If you think something shouldn't be talked about on here, report the topic to us... don't post that opinion in the thread.




