Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Archives > Archives > DVD Talk Archive
Reload this Page >

New T2 info...

Community
Search

New T2 info...

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-03 | 09:25 AM
  #26  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 9,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Chicago, IL
Oh god, this has been debated endlessly already. Basically there are some people who believe it is an unneccesary release (like me) others think they need to own it. Basically, to me, this release sounds like a gigantic promo for Microsoft and Windows Media players.

And no DTS!
chanster is offline  
Old 05-01-03 | 09:37 AM
  #27  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,463
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Chanster,

What if the transfer is MUCH better than the UE? Or, does video quality make little difference to you? Just wondering.
DavidH is offline  
Old 05-01-03 | 09:53 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Somerville, MA
The video quality only makes a difference to me if I notice it. I don't watch DVD's with a critical eye towards the transfer and I have no complaints about the UE's quality. Looks to me just as good on the UE as it looked in theaters (if not better).
C Roberts is offline  
Old 05-01-03 | 10:00 AM
  #29  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 9,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Chicago, IL
DavidH-

Yes video quality to me is important. But also very important to me is the ability to watch the theatrical and special edition anytime I want, without having to resort to my computer (and especially Windows Media Player, which blows goats in my mind).
chanster is offline  
Old 05-01-03 | 11:36 AM
  #30  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,463
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I understand wanting to have the theatrical version. For myself, I like the extended version better and that is all I watched. Having a 61" TV and being obsessed with video quality, I look forward to the Extreme Edition. Hopefully, we'll see reviews soon.
DavidH is offline  
Old 05-01-03 | 12:20 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by chanster
DavidH-

Yes video quality to me is important. But also very important to me is the ability to watch the theatrical and special edition anytime I want, without having to resort to my computer (and especially Windows Media Player, which blows goats in my mind).
For those of us that have HTPC's this isn't an issue. I watch WM clips through ZoomPlayer on my HDTV as easily as you watch a DVD using a STB.

So far the WM9 demo clips I have viewed equal the video quality I receive via OTA HD broadcasts, both of which exceed the quality of DVD. It certainly seems that Microsoft's WM9 codec is a viable way to get HD-DVD's in my hand now, while we wait for BluRay standards to be sorted out.

I suspect that before long somebody will come out with a STB DVD player that can handle the WM9 HD DVDs...
jim_cook87 is offline  
Old 05-01-03 | 02:07 PM
  #32  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Just got this from another thread:

From a technical standpoint, the HD WMV 9 version of T2 should be impressive, unlocking visual details that are impossible to see in the low-resolution standard DVD version. Also, thanks to the disc's 5.1-channel Windows Media Audio (WMA) 9 surround sound, this version will also feature a stunning, thumping soundtrack and sound effects. Artisan has completely digitally remastered the Windows Media version of the film, frame by frame, Microsoft says.
Interesting...that last part. Says nothing about the regular DVD version being remastered.
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 05-01-03 | 02:33 PM
  #33  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I'll be buying it, I don't own the UE, as I didn't really enjoy the documentaries much. But the documentaries on this DVD seem far more interesting, and the James Cameron comentary is a welcome. I'm no home-theatre fanatic, so no DTS doesn't really mean much to me, so count me in.
theneobez is offline  
Old 05-01-03 | 03:37 PM
  #34  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Clearwater, FL
Originally posted by digitalfreaknyc
Just got this from another thread:


Interesting...that last part. Says nothing about the regular DVD version being remastered.
Not in the article but the press release says the DVD version is created from a brand new Hi-Def master (frame by frame).

So, hopefully they lock the door so the guy who remastered the UE version is kept out, we should have a stellar transfer.

Doug
Doug Schiller is offline  
Old 05-01-03 | 03:41 PM
  #35  
Rypro 525's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 28,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: a frikin hellhole
Since artisan is known for drasticly changing transfers for better or worse (reservior dogs anyone, I personally like it better then the non anamorphic), what if they got rid of the blue tint, and made everything regular colors.
Rypro 525 is offline  
Old 05-01-03 | 04:21 PM
  #36  
New Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the original post that quotes Video Business is incorrect.

Standing in the Shadows of Motown is 2x DVD resolution

T2 Extreme is at least 3.5x DVD resolution....though I believe they are being conservative. It has been encoded into WM9 at 1920x1080 from the D5 of a new transfer
ideations is offline  
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.