Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD Reviews and Recommendations
Reload this Page >

How's The Butterfly Effect for a blind buy?

Community
Search
DVD Reviews and Recommendations Read, Post and Request DVD Reviews.

How's The Butterfly Effect for a blind buy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-04 | 10:36 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
See I don't think I agree.

I would watch the theatrical first. Then watch th directors cut.

Each is different enough and puts a different spin on things. And frankly I think both are good. And after seeing one vs the other it is easy to see why the studio liked the theatrical best.
Old 07-29-04 | 12:25 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by MacKenzieIII
See I don't think I agree.

I would watch the theatrical first. Then watch th directors cut.

Each is different enough and puts a different spin on things. And frankly I think both are good. And after seeing one vs the other it is easy to see why the studio liked the theatrical best.
When I said it really doesn't matter, I was meaning that there's nothing that you'd have to see in the theatrical cut first in order to understand the Director's Cut. Thinking about it though, I would watch the Theatrical Cut first because if I saw the Director's Cut first, I'd be really let down by the ending of the Theatrical version since it doesn't take the kind of risk that the Director's Cut does.

And I too can see why the studio picked the Theatrical version for release. The Director's Cut isn't very mainstream-friendly.
Old 07-31-04 | 02:54 AM
  #28  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,656
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
From: Los Angeles
This movie pissed me off, for wasting a really interesting idea. *rant activated*
Spoiler:
First of all, the whole point of the butterfly effect in nature is that a very small thing can create a massive change as things progress. In this movie, everything that he does to try to change things is something massive, it is never small. Even when he tries to prove his gift to his cellmate. He slams his hands down on the two paper spikes? Why not just give himself a bad papercut or something.

And I never got a good sense of what he was going to back to change, he never had a real gameplan, it all seemed like he made it up as he went. If he knows the consequences of his actions by having already gone back to change things, then why wouldn't he begin to plan ahead, to try to find an easy and non-disruptive way to undo stuff? It seemed like the film was being tragic just to be tragic, with nothing really driving it other than stupidity.

And the whole idea that his father, and potentially grandfather, had the same illness...what does that add to his story other than some idea of fate, which according to this movie, is bullshit, because you can change your destiny at will.


Just my thoughts from just having rented this for the first and only time. I'm mostly frustrated that this was such an interesting idea wasted on this film. I would like to have seen an intelligent director tackle something like this, like Christopher Nolan. I would have like to have seen him try to change things in small ways, but still have something turn out wrong. That would have been more tragic in the end. The fact that he completely turns everything upside down everytime he goes back is just pointless in the end. I never really felt sorry for him, because he brought it all on himself eventually, but not out of hubris or anything, but by pure stupidity.
Old 08-01-04 | 11:17 AM
  #29  
New Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Durham, England
I was pleasantly surprised with this movie and enjoyed it. Ok there was nothing that really stood out for me, it was just entertaining and the directors cut is by far the better movie.
Old 08-02-04 | 01:41 PM
  #30  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Clarkston, MI
Originally posted by FinkPish
Spoiler:
First of all, the whole point of the butterfly effect in nature is that a very small thing can create a massive change as things progress. In this movie, everything that he does to try to change things is something massive, it is never small. Even when he tries to prove his gift to his cellmate. He slams his hands down on the two paper spikes? Why not just give himself a bad papercut or something.
Spoiler:
His prison mate was a Jesus freak and he told him that Jesus talked to him in his dreams. He wanted to proove to him that he had great powers. The two spikes in his hands were supposed to resemble the two nails in JC's hands when he was crucified.


Anyways... enough of that. I enjoyed the movie a lot... the theatrical version anyway. Pretty depressing at times, but I thought it was really interesting to watch.
Old 08-03-04 | 03:20 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: New Mexico
I rented this movie and only saw the director cut version first (the disc wouldn't play the other version for some reason)
But I would of bought it anyway...I liked it!!
Out of all of AK movies...I liked this one the best other than,Dude Where's My Car

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.