How's The Butterfly Effect for a blind buy?
#26
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
See I don't think I agree.
I would watch the theatrical first. Then watch th directors cut.
Each is different enough and puts a different spin on things. And frankly I think both are good. And after seeing one vs the other it is easy to see why the studio liked the theatrical best.
I would watch the theatrical first. Then watch th directors cut.
Each is different enough and puts a different spin on things. And frankly I think both are good. And after seeing one vs the other it is easy to see why the studio liked the theatrical best.
#27
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by MacKenzieIII
See I don't think I agree.
I would watch the theatrical first. Then watch th directors cut.
Each is different enough and puts a different spin on things. And frankly I think both are good. And after seeing one vs the other it is easy to see why the studio liked the theatrical best.
See I don't think I agree.
I would watch the theatrical first. Then watch th directors cut.
Each is different enough and puts a different spin on things. And frankly I think both are good. And after seeing one vs the other it is easy to see why the studio liked the theatrical best.
And I too can see why the studio picked the Theatrical version for release. The Director's Cut isn't very mainstream-friendly.
#28
DVD Talk Limited Edition
This movie pissed me off, for wasting a really interesting idea. *rant activated*
Just my thoughts from just having rented this for the first and only time. I'm mostly frustrated that this was such an interesting idea wasted on this film. I would like to have seen an intelligent director tackle something like this, like Christopher Nolan. I would have like to have seen him try to change things in small ways, but still have something turn out wrong. That would have been more tragic in the end. The fact that he completely turns everything upside down everytime he goes back is just pointless in the end. I never really felt sorry for him, because he brought it all on himself eventually, but not out of hubris or anything, but by pure stupidity.
Spoiler:
Just my thoughts from just having rented this for the first and only time. I'm mostly frustrated that this was such an interesting idea wasted on this film. I would like to have seen an intelligent director tackle something like this, like Christopher Nolan. I would have like to have seen him try to change things in small ways, but still have something turn out wrong. That would have been more tragic in the end. The fact that he completely turns everything upside down everytime he goes back is just pointless in the end. I never really felt sorry for him, because he brought it all on himself eventually, but not out of hubris or anything, but by pure stupidity.
#29
New Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Durham, England
I was pleasantly surprised with this movie and enjoyed it. Ok there was nothing that really stood out for me, it was just entertaining and the directors cut is by far the better movie.
#30
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Clarkston, MI
Originally posted by FinkPish
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Anyways... enough of that. I enjoyed the movie a lot... the theatrical version anyway. Pretty depressing at times, but I thought it was really interesting to watch.
#31
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: New Mexico
I rented this movie and only saw the director cut version first (the disc wouldn't play the other version for some reason)
But I would of bought it anyway...I liked it!!
Out of all of AK movies...I liked this one the best other than,Dude Where's My Car
But I would of bought it anyway...I liked it!!
Out of all of AK movies...I liked this one the best other than,Dude Where's My Car




