Just watched The Fifth Element-Superbit
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just watched The Fifth Element-Superbit
Very upset with this one!!! The bit rate was much lower then Desperado. I don't have a non superbit Fifth to compare to, but the graph showed high 7 to 8 and sometime spiking to the nines. The sound was good, but why was this not released in 1.85???? I didn't bother to read the back because I thought all Superbit was 1.85.
I can't wait to check out "Airforce One"
I can't wait to check out "Airforce One"
#2
DVD Talk Godfather & 2020 TOTY Winner
As an old-timer at DVD Talk, there aren't too many terms that trip me up, but what do you mean "released in 1.85"? Are you talking about the OAR or something?
#4
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Suwanee, GA
I disagree, I thought that the Fifth Element Superbit had a great picture. The colors were more vibrant than anything I had seen, and it was very clear, at least on my old 27" tv.
#5
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I always thought DVDs(any) looked excellent on a 27 or a 36. But Since I bought a 65 16x9, details are much more noticeable. Desperado was done really well. The proof is in the bit rate. Desperado was higher throughout the entire movie compare to T5E.
#8
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Suwanee, GA
Originally posted by Berkowitz
I always thought DVDs(any) looked excellent on a 27 or a 36. But Since I bought a 65 16x9, details are much more noticeable. Desperado was done really well. The proof is in the bit rate. Desperado was higher throughout the entire movie compare to T5E.
I always thought DVDs(any) looked excellent on a 27 or a 36. But Since I bought a 65 16x9, details are much more noticeable. Desperado was done really well. The proof is in the bit rate. Desperado was higher throughout the entire movie compare to T5E.
#9
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Seattle, WA
Originally posted by MACD23
correct me if i'm wrong, but i thought i read that 2:35 was the best aspect ratio and used in the highest quality films... i prefer it to the other ratios because its extremely wide.
correct me if i'm wrong, but i thought i read that 2:35 was the best aspect ratio and used in the highest quality films... i prefer it to the other ratios because its extremely wide.
There are simply some films which wouldn't make much sense with a 2.35 AR -- just as there are some films that wouldn't make much sense in 1.85. This doesn't mean that one AR is better than the other in general, just that certain ratios are prefered for certain types of movies.
Steven Spielberg shoots exclusively in 1.85, but I think most people would say Schindler's List is still a "high quality film."




