Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD & Home Theater Gear
Reload this Page >

Which $200 Receiver should i buy?

Community
Search
DVD & Home Theater Gear Discuss DVD and Home Theater Equipment.

Which $200 Receiver should i buy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-05 | 09:10 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Baltimore
Which $200 Receiver should i buy?

I want to buy something that does 5.1 to watch movies in my basement. I have $250 in Best Buy credit and found these 4 on their website:


Yamaha HTR-5730

Pioneer VSXD514K
Sony STRDE597
Kenwood VR-806

Thanks
Old 01-20-05 | 09:16 AM
  #2  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 12,349
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
From: USA
If that is where you need to spend the money and those are the choices I would take the Yamaha.
Old 01-20-05 | 09:52 AM
  #3  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: State of perpetual confusion
Don't forget they're doing an open-box/display clearance right now; you may find a nice deal on something at your local Best Buy.
Old 01-20-05 | 10:17 AM
  #4  
dollfins1's Avatar
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NJ
Originally Posted by Brian Shannon
If that is where you need to spend the money and those are the choices I would take the Yamaha.
based on what? according to the description that model doesn't even have component video inputs/outputs. that would be the last one i would pick for that reason alone. i would go with one of the models that offers 6.1 sound (just in case you want to upgrade one day) and has at least 2 component video inputs and one component video output. and of course you should listen to them first in person.

chris
dollfins1
Old 01-20-05 | 10:27 AM
  #5  
tommyp007's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,707
Received 204 Likes on 139 Posts
From: Kingsport, TN
Of those listed.....the Kenwood seems the best bet. 6.1 sound and a better warranty.
Old 01-20-05 | 11:19 AM
  #6  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: State of perpetual confusion
I also see that the Yamaha 5740 and Pioneer 814, both of which are 6.1 and have component video switching, are each on sale for $280 on the website. Something to consider if you're willing to chip in a little on top of your $250 in BB credit.
Old 01-20-05 | 12:25 PM
  #7  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 12,349
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
From: USA
according to the description that model doesn't even have component video inputs/outputs
Personally I never switch through a receiver for video. It is always better to run the video straight to the display.

Next I like the two year warranty, Pioneer and sony do not have that.

i would go with one of the models that offers 6.1 sound (just in case you want to upgrade one day)
Based on the amount of media out for 6.1 I am not convinced that someone at this price point needs that feature.

Lastly I have used and I am using Yamaha in my home theater. I have never been a fan of Kenwood, the Sony non es products are poorly made.
Old 01-20-05 | 02:53 PM
  #8  
dollfins1's Avatar
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NJ
Originally Posted by Brian Shannon
Personally I never switch through a receiver for video. It is always better to run the video straight to the display.

Next I like the two year warranty, Pioneer and sony do not have that.



Based on the amount of media out for 6.1 I am not convinced that someone at this price point needs that feature.

Lastly I have used and I am using Yamaha in my home theater. I have never been a fan of Kenwood, the Sony non es products are poorly made.

touche. all i know is right now i have 3 progressive scan dvd mega-changers (with a 4th on the way) hooking everything up through my rptv is not a feasible option since at most there will be 2 component video inputs. i'm interested in getting the best picture too. i would never recommend something that i would not purchase myself. but you're right maybe the op isn't interested in such nonsense, or doesn't mind getting up and unhooking his x box or satellite every time he wants to play a dvd. perhaps he should have been more specific as to what his needs/wants were out of the reciever. as far as the sony non es products being poorly made, they are as "poorly made" as any other brands in this price range. although i use sony products, i would not recommend them over other brands simply because i use them. from personal experience the few times i have had any problems with one of my sony products (usually because of my own ignorance) sony has sent me a refurb unit within 1 week of reciept. their customer service is top notch in my book.

chris
dollfins1
Old 01-20-05 | 03:23 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do yourself a favor and pick up the Onkyo TX-SR502 from CircuityCity.com. It is on sale for $254.99 and it well worth the extra money. If budget is tight, head over to ecost.com and pick up a factory refurb 502 with a one year warranty for $179 shipped.

Check out what people have to say about the 502 over at the Spot and you will see why I recommend it.

Ah.. just saw the BB credit thing. Still go buy the 502 and use the credit on something else.
Old 01-20-05 | 08:06 PM
  #10  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 37,631
Received 742 Likes on 640 Posts
From: Home again, Big D
Originally Posted by sq240
Do yourself a favor and pick up the Onkyo TX-SR502 from CircuityCity.com. It is on sale for $254.99 and it well worth the extra money. If budget is tight, head over to ecost.com and pick up a factory refurb 502 with a one year warranty for $179 shipped.

Check out what people have to say about the 502 over at the Spot and you will see why I recommend it.

Ah.. just saw the BB credit thing. Still go buy the 502 and use the credit on something else.
What he said!
Old 01-20-05 | 08:36 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: State of perpetual confusion
Originally Posted by dollfins1
all i know is right now i have 3 progressive scan dvd mega-changers (with a 4th on the way) hooking everything up through my rptv is not a feasible option since at most there will be 2 component video inputs. i'm interested in getting the best picture too.
Old 01-20-05 | 08:56 PM
  #12  
dollfins1's Avatar
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NJ
thanks Dah-Dee! i am aware of the component switcher boxes. i really don't have a problem running some of my component cables through my reciever. i was just trying to make a point that this is one option that every "good" digital av reciever should have at least 2 component inputs and 1 output. that way it wouldn't be necessary to have to buy additional equiptment to have to hook things up. personally i think all recievers and tvs should have as many input/output options as possible to accomodate everyone from the beginner to the enthusiast. buying a reciever w/o these options is a bad choice imo.
chris
dollfins1
Old 01-20-05 | 10:28 PM
  #13  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Houston, TX
Can someone explain to me what's so bad about running video through a receiver??

Oh and as for which receiver I would go with??
Either the Pioneer or the Yamaha.
Old 01-20-05 | 11:26 PM
  #14  
dollfins1's Avatar
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NJ
Originally Posted by jessecrx
Can someone explain to me what's so bad about running video through a receiver??

Oh and as for which receiver I would go with??
Either the Pioneer or the Yamaha.

there's nothing wrong with it. for dvd's it doesn't degrade the signal to the extent that can be noticed by the human eye. my whole point is that the yamaha that the op is interested in has no component video connections at all. i can't understand brand loyalty at the cost of what i would consider "necessary" features.
Old 01-21-05 | 05:04 AM
  #15  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 5,230
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: New York City
Doesn'tmanyone care about SOUND QUALITY>>> Don't be fooled by the specs either. The Yammy amps are high-current too. I'd pick the Yammy, followed bythe Pioneer or Kenwood. Sorry Dollfin, but the low-end Sony's are poorly-made,and sound crappy to boot.
Old 01-21-05 | 09:52 AM
  #16  
dollfins1's Avatar
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NJ
Originally Posted by drmoze
Doesn'tmanyone care about SOUND QUALITY>>> Don't be fooled by the specs either. The Yammy amps are high-current too. I'd pick the Yammy, followed bythe Pioneer or Kenwood. Sorry Dollfin, but the low-end Sony's are poorly-made,and sound crappy to boot.

i did not say i would pick the sony if you read my posts more closely. i said "and of course you should listen to them first in person". but i most certainly would not recommend buying ANY reciever without component inputs/switching and at least 6.1 sound. why should someone have to buy a new reciever or additional hardware if they decide to upgrade? sorry dr. moze there are too many other models in this price pont that sound just as good to recommend buying a reciever w/o component inputs (or s video!). thats just blind brand loyalty and bad advice. let me guess you own a yamaha too lol
Old 01-21-05 | 11:43 AM
  #17  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Baltimore
Thanks for the advice guys. I ended up picking an open box Yahmaha HTR-5730 for $160.

This is basically for a secondary system for my basement and I only need 5.1. I'm using a PS2 as the DVD player and some old mirage speakers/sw so top shelf is not needed . If i upgrade and get a DVD player that does composite video i'll run it straight to the tv. For the most part this is just keeping me happy until I can afford to set up my primary HT. so far i am happy with it.
Old 01-21-05 | 08:18 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
>>so far i am happy with it.

This is all that matters.
Old 01-22-05 | 01:24 PM
  #19  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 5,230
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: New York City
Originally Posted by dollfins1
thats just blind brand loyalty and bad advice. let me guess you own a yamaha too lol
Nope. Have a Denon now. Used to have a Yammy tho and would buy one again. (Happy with the Denon now!) The Yammy sounded great with my NHTs. (Actually started with a Sony that sounded crappy, and have heard more Sonys since that sound just as bad. Their DSP modes suck IMO, and all of their non-ES receivers are rated *way* above their actual anemic power output. Check any testing results....)
Old 01-22-05 | 03:34 PM
  #20  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 35,913
Received 280 Likes on 229 Posts
From: East County
Good job picking the Yamaha, schlitzy. Definitely the best of the four listed above.
Old 01-23-05 | 10:02 PM
  #21  
Deftones's Avatar
DVD Talk God
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 83,694
Received 2,078 Likes on 1,401 Posts
From: Arizona
i have been completely happy w/ my Yamaha receiver for over 4 years now.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.