is it worth getting thx surround ex reciever?
#1
Thread Starter
New Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Fort Lee , NJ
is it worth getting thx surround ex reciever?
Some receivers have THX surround ex technology which is basically having 1 or 2 more surround speakers for more surround sound.(6.1 or 7.1)
There are only a handful of DVDs that actually have this sound format available such as Terminator 2.
So the question:
Is there a difference in sound for a 5.1 dolby digital DVD that is heard with 5.1 dolby digital theater versus the THX surround ex theater. In other words does the sound have to be formatted on the DVD specifically as THX surround ex to really enjoy a THX surround ex theater or does the theater bring something extra for regular 5.1 dobly digital dvds as well?
There are only a handful of DVDs that actually have this sound format available such as Terminator 2.
So the question:
Is there a difference in sound for a 5.1 dolby digital DVD that is heard with 5.1 dolby digital theater versus the THX surround ex theater. In other words does the sound have to be formatted on the DVD specifically as THX surround ex to really enjoy a THX surround ex theater or does the theater bring something extra for regular 5.1 dobly digital dvds as well?
#2
Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: is it worth getting thx surround ex reciever?
Originally posted by Tonylava
It's similiar to using DPL on stereo material. Some like it, some don't, which of course depends on the source also.
More important, do you really have the room to add one or two additional speakers behind you?
#3
New Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a Denon THX-EX/DTS-ES amplifier.
Rember when you upgraded from Pro-Logic to Dolby Digital it made you say wow! Well EX gets close to that, it made me go through my entire disc collection just to see what new effects would pop out of the new rears.
To answer your question a DVD dosen't have to be encoded in EX to sound good in a 7.1/6.1 set up. Its not how the director intended it, but I like it.
on my model amp if you dont like THX post processing you can select DD 6.1 matrix.
DTS-ES 6.1 discret is AWSOME! although there are only a handfull of discs out there.
If more rear speakers aren't a problem in your home I recomend it.
Rember when you upgraded from Pro-Logic to Dolby Digital it made you say wow! Well EX gets close to that, it made me go through my entire disc collection just to see what new effects would pop out of the new rears.
To answer your question a DVD dosen't have to be encoded in EX to sound good in a 7.1/6.1 set up. Its not how the director intended it, but I like it.
on my model amp if you dont like THX post processing you can select DD 6.1 matrix.
DTS-ES 6.1 discret is AWSOME! although there are only a handfull of discs out there.
If more rear speakers aren't a problem in your home I recomend it.
Last edited by Malcolm Burns; 07-16-01 at 09:58 PM.
#4
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Long Island
Unlike Malcolm, I do think there's a difference but it's no way the improvement DD brought us over DPL. If you have the room and the $$$ to buy decent rear speakers it's definitely worth it but don't expect miracles.
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: USA
IMHO, if you are interested in sound quality, you should probably focus
your funds on seperate amplifiers to significantly boost HT performance,
and not the latest surround sound flavor.
Hook your reciever up to this inexpensive amp and watch your speakers
dance:
http://www.outlawaudio.com/products/750.html
Later, you can add a preamp/processor (there are inexpensive models from
Acurus and Parasound), or just leave the receiver hooked up.
your funds on seperate amplifiers to significantly boost HT performance,
and not the latest surround sound flavor.
Hook your reciever up to this inexpensive amp and watch your speakers
dance:
http://www.outlawaudio.com/products/750.html
Later, you can add a preamp/processor (there are inexpensive models from
Acurus and Parasound), or just leave the receiver hooked up.
#7
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by M i c h a e l
IMHO, if you are interested in sound quality, you should probably focus
your funds on seperate amplifiers to significantly boost HT performance,
and not the latest surround sound flavor.
Hook your reciever up to this inexpensive amp and watch your speakers
dance:
http://www.outlawaudio.com/products/750.html
Later, you can add a preamp/processor (there are inexpensive models from
Acurus and Parasound), or just leave the receiver hooked up.
IMHO, if you are interested in sound quality, you should probably focus
your funds on seperate amplifiers to significantly boost HT performance,
and not the latest surround sound flavor.
Hook your reciever up to this inexpensive amp and watch your speakers
dance:
http://www.outlawaudio.com/products/750.html
Later, you can add a preamp/processor (there are inexpensive models from
Acurus and Parasound), or just leave the receiver hooked up.
#8
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: USA
Originally posted by robertmee
I'm in the wrong business...Since when did $1000 bucks become inexpensive?
I'm in the wrong business...Since when did $1000 bucks become inexpensive?
In the world of Home Theater, $200 per channel for real amplification
is about as cheap as it gets.

But in my initial post, I was implying to transfer the cost of a new EX
receiver, to a new amplifier instead.
How much is the receiver you are looking at? Subtract its price from the
Outlaw amp, and your bottom line $$ will only be affected by that much.
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: ...Madison
Originally posted by robertmee
I'm in the wrong business...Since when did $1000 bucks become inexpensive?
I'm in the wrong business...Since when did $1000 bucks become inexpensive?




