Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Comic Book Talk
Reload this Page >

DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

Community
Search
Comic Book Talk The Place to talk about Comics

DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-13, 04:31 PM
  #1826  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

WTF are the covers made out of if they will melt like that?
Old 09-04-13, 04:41 PM
  #1827  
DVD Talk Legend
Thread Starter
 
The Valeyard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Building attractions one theme park at a time.
Posts: 10,800
Received 82 Likes on 49 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

Originally Posted by Supermallet
Comics that self-destruct 30 seconds after you finish reading?
Divx Comics.


Originally Posted by Trevor
Anyone read any of it yet, particularly the actual Forever Evil book?
I read Forever Evil and it's not bad. I'm definitely interested in seeing where the story goes.

From what I understand, only a few of the villain books tie into Forever Evil (like Grodd & Two-Face). Most were origin or one-shot stories.

I stuck with the 2D versions and only picked up titles I was interested in reading. It's not the 90s anymore. I should thank taffer for reminding me of that.
Old 09-04-13, 04:46 PM
  #1828  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

You're welcome I guess.

Although if these 3D covers are prone to melting, maybe they will actually be rare and worth something in the future.

I heard the Joker issue gave Joker an definitive origin. I haven't read it, so I can't confirm it, but that's what I heard.

Fuck the New 52 giving definitive origins to characters that worked best being ambiguous. First Phantom Stranger and now Joker...

Yeah, I know The Killing Joke gave an origin story too, but Joker was narrating it, and he was an unreliable narrator because he says he can't remember what actually happened and was basically making it up as he went along.
Old 09-05-13, 03:11 PM
  #1829  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

DC manages to once again piss off their employees. The Batwoman creative team is leaving after issue #26 due to editorial influence.


Dear Batwoman readers -

From the moment DC asked us to write Batwoman — a dream project for both of us — we were committed to the unofficial tagline “No Status Quo.” We felt that the series and characters should always be moving forward, to keep changing and evolving. In order to live up to our mantra and ensure that each arc took Batwoman in new directions, we carefully planned plotlines and story beats for at least the first five arcs well before we ever wrote a single issue. We’ve been executing on that plan ever since, making changes whenever we’ve come up with a better idea, but in general remaining consistent to our core vision.

Unfortunately, in recent months, DC has asked us to alter or completely discard many long-standing storylines in ways that we feel compromise the character and the series. We were told to ditch plans for Killer Croc’s origins; forced to drastically alter the original ending of our current arc, which would have defined Batwoman’s heroic future in bold new ways; and, most crushingly, prohibited from ever showing Kate and Maggie actually getting married. All of these editorial decisions came at the last minute, and always after a year or more of planning and plotting on our end.

We’ve always understood that, as much as we love the character, Batwoman ultimately belongs to DC. However, the eleventh-hour nature of these changes left us frustrated and angry — because they prevent us from telling the best stories we can. So, after a lot of soul-searching, we’ve decided to leave the book after Issue 26.

We’re both heartbroken over leaving, but we feel strongly that you all deserve stories that push the character and the series forward. We can’t reliably do our best work if our plans are scrapped at the last minute, so we’re stepping aside. We are committed to bringing our run to a satisfying conclusion and we think that Issue 26 will leave a lasting impression.

We are extremely thankful for the opportunity to work on Batwoman. It’s been one of the most challenging and rewarding projects of our careers. We’ll always be grateful to everyone who helped us realize 26 issues: Mike Siglain, who brought us onto the project originally; Greg Rucka for inspirationally setting the stage; our amazing artists Amy Reeder, Trevor McCarthy, Pere Perez, Rob Hunter, Walden Wong, Sandu Florea, Richard Friend, Francesco Francavilla, Guy Major, Dave Stewart, and Todd Klein; Larry Ganem, for listening in tough times; and editors Mike Marts, Harvey Richards, Rickey Purdin, and Darren Shan.

And most of all, a huge thank you to everyone who read the book. Hearing your voices, your reactions, your enthusiasm every month was such a joy, so humbling, so rewarding. You guys rock! Because so many of you embraced the series, we were able to complete four arcs, and your passion for Batwoman encouraged us to push ourselves to do our best work with each and every issue.

Thank you for loving Batwoman as much as we do.

Goodbye for now,

Haden & J H
Old 09-05-13, 04:05 PM
  #1830  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Travis McClain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Western Hemisphere
Posts: 7,775
Received 191 Likes on 125 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

I saw that about Batwoman on Twitter earlier. It seems DC wants to be gay for attention (Alan Scott) but not gay for reals (Kate & Maggie). And given the debacle of Forever Evil, I can't for the life of me fathom what the hell difference it would have made if they'd just let these guys give Killer Croc whatever origin they had in mind for him.

I think what's actually surprising about this is that so far, Batwoman was the one Bat-book that seemed to have some kind of autonomy. They've been allowed to adhere to their serialized graphic novel concept without being roped into "Night of the Owls" or "Death of the Family", and it's one of the books that was skipped during this month's "Forever Evil" mess. In fact, to date its only participation in any of the events was last year's #0 issue - which was confusing enough since there had already been a Batwoman #0 that was considered part of this series, published prior to The New 52 launch.

Other than the shady way they treated Amy Reeder, the word of mouth on this book had been pretty positive. They won some acclaim for it, including an award from GLAAD as I recall. DC made sure to tout that recognition at the time. I'm sure their official line would be something about how they didn't feel that Kate should marry right now, and that it wasn't about Maggie or their being two women, etc. But there's something about the way DC has behaved about everything else so far that makes me think they originally bought a Kate/Maggie relationship because someone thought it would be hot and then when they found it was, you know, like an actual relationship with "emotions" and "maturity" and whatnot, they were like, "Booooooring!"
Old 09-05-13, 07:36 PM
  #1831  
Banned by request
 
Supermallet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Termite Terrace
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

Old 09-05-13, 07:52 PM
  #1832  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Josh-da-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Bible Belt
Posts: 45,105
Received 3,127 Likes on 2,120 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

http://hasdcdonesomethingstupidtoday.com/



It has been 0 days since DC Comics did something stupid.

Previously, DC went less than 1 day without doing something stupid.
Old 09-06-13, 06:38 PM
  #1833  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Sunny Hawaii
Posts: 8,280
Received 500 Likes on 344 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

Originally Posted by Travis McClain
I'm sure their official line would be something about how they didn't feel that Kate should marry right now, and that it wasn't about Maggie or their being two women, etc.
Actually, it was about just marriage specifically, not gay marriage, as admitted by Haden, and confirmed by DC:

http://comicsalliance.com/batwoman-j...rial-marriage/

That said, it's a shame about that editorial edict. It seems like Kate and Maggie had a real, organic relationship, and it seems like marriage would have been a natural step.
Old 09-06-13, 06:51 PM
  #1834  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Travis McClain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Western Hemisphere
Posts: 7,775
Received 191 Likes on 125 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

Originally Posted by TheBang
Actually, it was about just marriage specifically, not gay marriage, as admitted by Haden, and confirmed by DC:

http://comicsalliance.com/batwoman-j...rial-marriage/

That said, it's a shame about that editorial edict. It seems like Kate and Maggie had a real, organic relationship, and it seems like marriage would have been a natural step.
This is consistent with the clumsy and obsolete views held by DC. In the past, the thinking against having a superhero get married is that the readers find domesticity boring and that, on some level, readers like the idea of heroes being unattached and able to score. Even if those views are still common, they don't apply to Kate and Maggie. Readers really responded to their relationship. It was the best thing about the book through the two arcs I've read. Hell, their relationship is easily one of the best things about The New 52.

At a time when the LGTBQ community is celebrating major victories for marriage equality, it seems pointless for DC to deny Batwoman readers that vicarious victory without any stronger editorial reason than a reluctance toward marriage for their characters. It'd be one thing if the relationship and marriage proposal had been a stunt of some kind, but it's been, as you said, a real, organic relationship. The characters deserve a wedding and so do the readers.
Old 09-06-13, 06:54 PM
  #1835  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

Originally Posted by Travis McClain
This is consistent with the clumsy and obsolete views held by DC. In the past, the thinking against having a superhero get married is that the readers find domesticity boring and that, on some level, readers like the idea of heroes being unattached and able to score. Even if those views are still common, they don't apply to Kate and Maggie. Readers really responded to their relationship. It was the best thing about the book through the two arcs I've read. Hell, their relationship is easily one of the best things about The New 52.

At a time when the LGTBQ community is celebrating major victories for marriage equality, it seems pointless for DC to deny Batwoman readers that vicarious victory without any stronger editorial reason than a reluctance toward marriage for their characters. It'd be one thing if the relationship and marriage proposal had been a stunt of some kind, but it's been, as you said, a real, organic relationship. The characters deserve a wedding and so do the readers.
To be fair, its not just DC. Marvel doesn't like their superheroes being married either. Need I remind you of Spider-Man's One More Day...
Old 09-06-13, 07:22 PM
  #1836  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Travis McClain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Western Hemisphere
Posts: 7,775
Received 191 Likes on 125 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

Originally Posted by taffer
To be fair, its not just DC. Marvel doesn't like their superheroes being married either. Need I remind you of Spider-Man's One More Day...
I don't actually read Marvel Comics...which is kind of funny since the first comics I ever read were published by them (G.I. Joe and The Transformers, plus some of the STAR Comics line). But in the big picture, I'm definitely aware that those views I described are held throughout the industry. I still maintain that even if they're still supported by readers' views, that Batwoman and its relationship with its readers is unique and ought to have been exempted from such closed-mindedness.

But, of course, no one asked me.
Old 09-06-13, 11:25 PM
  #1837  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

Dan DiDio made a comment on Twitter today about Batwoman needing to be more integrated into the larger shared universe. Apparently whatever crossing-over into the rest of the New 52 Universe she had done thus far wasn't enough, and perhaps those themselves were just editorial mandates of the time. I wouldn't be surprised if the new creative team was forced to bring her into the fold with the rest of the Bat-events and stop having her (largely) hang out in her own corner of the New 52 universe. Moreso than not wanting anyone, gay or straight, to be married, it seems like editorial wanted Batwoman to be more integrated to probably build up awareness of her for movies/TVs/toys/video games/etc. GLAAD awards or Eisner nominations are nice but for Warners/DC, they're not extra money and they're not as marketable as Batwoman being tied into the next Bat-event and/or joining some other team book. JHW3 wasn't going to be able to tell the stories he wanted to tell (including a marriage), so he walked. Even if there was no marriage in play I'm sure they would have pushed his buttons in a way to make him quit like they have with multiple other writers and artists. The DC editors either need to write the books themselves or just find writers who are slaves to the vision of the DC editors.
Old 09-07-13, 12:04 AM
  #1838  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Travis McClain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Western Hemisphere
Posts: 7,775
Received 191 Likes on 125 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

Originally Posted by kodave
Dan DiDio made a comment on Twitter today about Batwoman needing to be more integrated into the larger shared universe.
Of course that would be DiDio's perspective. He seems to be obsessed with commingling of DCU characters, like a child who keeps yelling, "Oh! You know what would be cool is if (X) and (Y) got teamed up! Oh! And (Z), too! That would be awesome!" Naturally, Batwoman's isolation from The New 52 is one of the things that appealed to me most about that book when I read it.

Moreso than not wanting anyone, gay or straight, to be married, it seems like editorial wanted Batwoman to be more integrated to probably build up awareness of her for movies/TVs/toys/video games/etc.
I get that line of thinking, but I guess the issue I have is that I don't understand how the book as it was was incompatible with merchandising her. If Warner Animation believed in her as a character (which they don't), they could easily just put her into Beware the Batman or a DTV animated feature, and not be beholden to comic continuity at all. There's no reason she can't be a playable character in any DC/Batman games; hell, I'd love to have her in a LEGO Batman 3!

Aside from DiDio's fixation on teamups and crossovers, I think the other chief problem is that Williams and Blackman have essentially crafted Batwoman as a serialization of graphic novels. Their arcs are conceived five, six months ahead of time, and clearly DC is more interested in being able to micromanage on the fly. Which, you know, seems like a brilliant way to promote quality storytelling.

The DC editors either need to write the books themselves or just find writers who are slaves to the vision of the DC editors.
The first part of this frightens me, and I'm afraid the second part is precisely what they've been doing all along.
Old 09-07-13, 02:15 AM
  #1839  
Banned by request
 
Supermallet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Termite Terrace
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

Seems like so long ago that they were giving Alan Moore and Frank Miller almost whatever they wanted to craft engaging, original stories. Granted, many of those were not in continuity, but there's no way you could find something as good as Alan Moore's run on Swamp Thing in a mainstream DC comic today.

Also, DC really fucked up with this one: http://www.theouthousers.com/index.p...-outraged.html

Basically, DC had a half good idea; let readers submit panels for a Harley Quinn comic, and give them a chance to connect with people in the industry. They then required that one of the panels be Harley naked in a bathtub as she prepares to commit suicide. This did not go over well. It did not go over well at all. The writers then explain that these panels were actually being done as a spoof, that Harley is breaking the fourth wall and complaining about how she's being treated by DC. But none of that was communicated beforehand.
Old 09-07-13, 02:36 AM
  #1840  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Travis McClain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Western Hemisphere
Posts: 7,775
Received 191 Likes on 125 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

Originally Posted by Supermallet
Also, DC really fucked up with this one: http://www.theouthousers.com/index.p...-outraged.html


Oh, and I actually made the mistake of reading the comments, too.

Old 09-07-13, 10:16 AM
  #1841  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 43,205
Received 36 Likes on 20 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

Originally Posted by Supermallet
Seems like so long ago that they were giving Alan Moore and Frank Miller almost whatever they wanted to craft engaging, original stories. Granted, many of those were not in continuity, but there's no way you could find something as good as Alan Moore's run on Swamp Thing in a mainstream DC comic today.

Also, DC really fucked up with this one: http://www.theouthousers.com/index.p...-outraged.html

Basically, DC had a half good idea; let readers submit panels for a Harley Quinn comic, and give them a chance to connect with people in the industry. They then required that one of the panels be Harley naked in a bathtub as she prepares to commit suicide. This did not go over well. It did not go over well at all. The writers then explain that these panels were actually being done as a spoof, that Harley is breaking the fourth wall and complaining about how she's being treated by DC. But none of that was communicated beforehand.
The thing that gets me about that contest is this -- let's leave aside the way the content looks offensive out of context (knowing Jimmy and Amanda's work, I'd bet it works just fine in context).

It's four disconnected panels. If you're looking to do a contest where people can show off how well they can pencil a page of sequential art, give them a page of sequential art. How is any editor supposed to judge how weel the artist can handle panel-to-panel continuity, storytelling, transitions, or any of the other artistic elements of comic book art?

DC is stupid.
Old 09-07-13, 11:55 AM
  #1842  
Banned by request
 
Supermallet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Termite Terrace
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

Yep. All they had to do was list any other four panels and it would have been fine. The issue would have appeared, the offending panels would have been in their proper context, and someone would have gotten their art featured in it. It's just unbelievable that DC could be this utterly retarded.
Old 09-07-13, 02:45 PM
  #1843  
DVD Talk Hero
 
PhantomStranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Phantom Zone
Posts: 28,046
Received 939 Likes on 793 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
I shudder to imagine what kind of forced-scarcity gimmick Marvel is concocting.
I've grown to absolutely despise these gimmicks but they seem to work on comic book readers.
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
This is consistent with the clumsy and obsolete views held by DC. In the past, the thinking against having a superhero get married is that the readers find domesticity boring and that, on some level, readers like the idea of heroes being unattached and able to score. Even if those views are still common, they don't apply to Kate and Maggie. Readers really responded to their relationship. It was the best thing about the book through the two arcs I've read. Hell, their relationship is easily one of the best things about The New 52.

At a time when the LGTBQ community is celebrating major victories for marriage equality, it seems pointless for DC to deny Batwoman readers that vicarious victory without any stronger editorial reason than a reluctance toward marriage for their characters. It'd be one thing if the relationship and marriage proposal had been a stunt of some kind, but it's been, as you said, a real, organic relationship. The characters deserve a wedding and so do the readers.
I think I understand where DC is coming from on the lesbian marriage issue. It would be a public relations nightmare in the future for DC if they ever went in another direction with the character and divorced them or discarded the marriage.

Marrying them off now would basically confine that character to being married for time immemorial. It would greatly limit the type of stories you could do for Batwoman.
Old 09-07-13, 03:48 PM
  #1844  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Greg MacGuffin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Formerly known as "Jeffy Pop"/Denver
Posts: 3,038
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
I've grown to absolutely despise these gimmicks but they seem to work on comic book readers.

I think I understand where DC is coming from on the lesbian marriage issue. It would be a public relations nightmare in the future for DC if they ever went in another direction with the character and divorced them or discarded the marriage.

Marrying them off now would basically confine that character to being married for time immemorial. It would greatly limit the type of stories you could do for Batwoman.
Or it could create the opportunity to tell new and different kinds of stories that have never been done in mainstream superhero comics. Depends on how you look at it.
Old 09-07-13, 04:30 PM
  #1845  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

Why are they rebooting these franchise's!? I want them to just keep the same stuff they have and start a justice league movie. By now we will never get one.
Old 09-07-13, 06:59 PM
  #1846  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Travis McClain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Western Hemisphere
Posts: 7,775
Received 191 Likes on 125 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
I think I understand where DC is coming from on the lesbian marriage issue. It would be a public relations nightmare in the future for DC if they ever went in another direction with the character and divorced them or discarded the marriage.

Marrying them off now would basically confine that character to being married for time immemorial. It would greatly limit the type of stories you could do for Batwoman.
I'm unconvinced of this. We've seen these things happen to much more important characters over the years. Batwoman is only a few years old. If we can accept Lois & Clark or Peter & Mary Jane un-marrying, why not Kate & Maggie?
Old 09-07-13, 07:59 PM
  #1847  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Formerly known as Groucho AND Bandoman/Death Moans, Iowa
Posts: 18,352
Received 375 Likes on 269 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

Originally Posted by Armymanis
Why are they rebooting these franchise's!? I want them to just keep the same stuff they have and start a justice league movie. By now we will never get one.
?
Old 09-07-13, 08:36 PM
  #1848  
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
 
Adam Tyner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 29,491
Received 2,102 Likes on 1,386 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
I think I understand where DC is coming from on the lesbian marriage issue. It would be a public relations nightmare in the future for DC if they ever went in another direction with the character and divorced them or discarded the marriage.
DC has made it clear they're anti-married superheroes in general. Heck, they just said that Mera is no longer married to Aquaman, despite the fact that she was introduced in the New 52 as his queen.
Old 09-08-13, 12:45 PM
  #1849  
DVD Talk Legend
Thread Starter
 
The Valeyard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Building attractions one theme park at a time.
Posts: 10,800
Received 82 Likes on 49 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

They commented on that. She may be Aquaman's queen but at no time in the New52 has she ever been referred to as his "wife." Just "Queen."

We then clarified that, against expectations, Aquaman and Mera were no longer married in New 52 continuity. And that Geoff Johns had very carefully written them in Aquaman and Justice League as if they were still married but had avoided any mention of that fact, or anyone actually referring to them as “husband” or “wife” of the other.

Yes. DC has no idea WTF they're doing or saying.

Last edited by The Valeyard; 09-08-13 at 12:51 PM.
Old 09-08-13, 01:02 PM
  #1850  
DVD Talk Hero
 
PhantomStranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Phantom Zone
Posts: 28,046
Received 939 Likes on 793 Posts
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide

Originally Posted by Travis McClain
I'm unconvinced of this. We've seen these things happen to much more important characters over the years. Batwoman is only a few years old. If we can accept Lois & Clark or Peter & Mary Jane un-marrying, why not Kate & Maggie?
Well, those two examples met with a firestorm of criticism and many fans abandoned the books over those two "divorces." Some completely stopped reading Marvel Comics after Spidey's divorce. But the issue would get magnified in the mainstream press with gay and lesbian characters.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.