Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Book Talk
Reload this Page >

Stephen King should go back and correct "Carrie" [spoilers]

Community
Search
Book Talk A Place To Discuss Books and Audiobooks

Stephen King should go back and correct "Carrie" [spoilers]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-03 | 12:01 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,410
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: New York
Stephen King should go back and correct "Carrie" [spoilers]

I noticed a huge mistake in the novel. Carrie was King's first published novel, in 1974, and the novel explains how Carrie's father, Ralph White, was dead before she was born. Then, later in the story, it is revealed that Carrie was spied by her mother, Margaret White, levitating a rattle from the crib during infancy. Margaret had almost killed her then. Ralph had stopped her reads the passage. The passage is erroneous because Ralph was already dead.

Shouldn't King and his publishers have gone back and corrected that?
Old 10-21-03 | 12:59 PM
  #2  
Jason Bovberg's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer Emeritus
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,644
Received 189 Likes on 114 Posts
From: Fort Collins, CO
Maybe the way he stopped her was to reach his hand out of his grave?
Old 10-21-03 | 04:25 PM
  #3  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 8,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Arch City
Yeah, go back and correct it. Then maybe Carrie might finally sell some copies... and maybe even get a movie deal?


Old 10-21-03 | 05:51 PM
  #4  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 4,806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Grounded in reality. For the most part.
Originally posted by BoatDrinks
Yeah, go back and correct it. Then maybe Carrie might finally sell some copies... and maybe even get a movie deal?


::

Wait a minute, that could be the reason why the TV series was never picked up.
Old 10-21-03 | 07:30 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,410
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: New York
I don't understand all the sarcasm. I have never seen a discrepancy in a Stephen King book before (or I've never noticed it), and this is kinda confusing to someone who is really reading the story as opposed to the rest of you who don't think it really matters.

Would it really take a lot of effort to correct the story, since it is a terrific story and one worth printing in perfection.
Old 10-21-03 | 08:33 PM
  #6  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: not CT
http://www.slipups.com/items/454.html

Many more King errors here: http://www.horrorking.com/mistakes1.html
Old 10-22-03 | 09:20 AM
  #7  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: New Jersey, where the state motto should be Leave No Tree Standing
I'd also venture a guess that the vast majority of published books, especially mainstream fiction by authors who publish at least once a year, contain similar minor errors.
Old 10-22-03 | 09:23 AM
  #8  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,410
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: New York
Okay, so then King has to at least be aware of it. My job is done.
Old 10-22-03 | 09:43 AM
  #9  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Taxachusetts
Spoilers below--be warned!

Stephen King even admits that he makes mistakes in his books. When The Green Mile was published serially there is a scene where Percy is put in a straitjacket, and a few paragraphs later he is not. When the trade paperback was published Mr. King admitted that he screwed up in the foreword and fixed it for that and all future editions, so him screwing up isn't something new.
Old 10-22-03 | 12:52 PM
  #10  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 8,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Arch City
Originally posted by Buttmunker
I don't understand all the sarcasm.
Would it really take a lot of effort to correct the story, since it is a terrific story and one worth printing in perfection.
Well, perhaps if the book had been published more recently... like within the last 25 years, then maybe the thought would be taken more seriously?

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.