Spiderman 3 to be the last
#1
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Thread Starter
Spiderman 3 to be the last
http://www.latinoreview.com/intervie...onspidey3.html
How stupid is it that if Raimi wants to do more that they are telling him this is it? You would think the studio would see the millions/billions to be made by continuing to makes these movies, especially if they continued to be quality films. I hope someone comes to their senses on making more of these movies, especially if Raimi is on board.
How stupid is it that if Raimi wants to do more that they are telling him this is it? You would think the studio would see the millions/billions to be made by continuing to makes these movies, especially if they continued to be quality films. I hope someone comes to their senses on making more of these movies, especially if Raimi is on board.
Last edited by Ketamine; 10-11-04 at 09:41 AM.
#2
Yeah, Rami will let Spider Man 3 be his last, but is this a guarantee Columbia Pictures won't pimp it out to some other directors? We could see Spider-Man 5: Spidey and Frog Man sometime in the future......
If Rami uses Black Cat in the final movie, that will be great, but if not, I will be left wanting more.
If Rami uses Black Cat in the final movie, that will be great, but if not, I will be left wanting more.
#3
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Thread Starter
Originally posted by calhoun07
Yeah, Rami will let Spider Man 3 be his last, but is this a guarantee Columbia Pictures won't pimp it out to some other directors? We could see Spider-Man 5: Spidey and Frog Man sometime in the future......
Yeah, Rami will let Spider Man 3 be his last, but is this a guarantee Columbia Pictures won't pimp it out to some other directors? We could see Spider-Man 5: Spidey and Frog Man sometime in the future......
"One thing that Amy Pascal told me was that she wants to make this a proper ending to the Spider-Man saga. I'd like to keep directing Spider-Man movies but I think she's thinking that the audience feels they want to see one more and no more."
#5
Originally posted by Mutley Hyde
That's no good. Spider-man could be the James Bond franchise of the 21st century.
That's no good. Spider-man could be the James Bond franchise of the 21st century.
I think they should leave it open ended. If the right director/script comes along, green light it. If not, don't do a fourth movie for the sake of doing a fourth movie.
#6
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell
Posts: 34,139
Received 741 Likes
on
543 Posts
Originally posted by Mutley Hyde
That's no good. Spider-man could be the James Bond franchise of the 21st century.
That's no good. Spider-man could be the James Bond franchise of the 21st century.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: North Carolina (in two weeks!)
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by devilshalo
it's just not cost effective. Sony has spent in excess of $400M on 2 Spider-man films.
it's just not cost effective. Sony has spent in excess of $400M on 2 Spider-man films.
#9
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Thread Starter
Originally posted by devilshalo
Sony can do more Bonds (since they now have rights to the franchise from the MGM deal). But while Spider-man is a great franchise, I can't see the studio wanting more beyond a trilogy, it's just not cost effective. Sony has spent in excess of $400M on 2 Spider-man films. That's more than what New Line spent on the whole LOTR trilogy.
Sony can do more Bonds (since they now have rights to the franchise from the MGM deal). But while Spider-man is a great franchise, I can't see the studio wanting more beyond a trilogy, it's just not cost effective. Sony has spent in excess of $400M on 2 Spider-man films. That's more than what New Line spent on the whole LOTR trilogy.
#10
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Thread Starter
Originally posted by devilshalo
So you'd be ok with spending $300M on the next installment? $400 on part 4, $500M on part 5?
So you'd be ok with spending $300M on the next installment? $400 on part 4, $500M on part 5?
BTW: why not film Spiderman 4,5, and 6 all at the same time like with LOTR. Think about how much money they would pull in if they did something like this with a good story. Oh the possibilities.
#11
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Let's wait until we get a more reliable source than this. Considering how well the Spiderman films do, do you really think the studio won't want more. Normally it is the director not wanting to do more.
A mistake I noticed, they said Harry as the Hobgoblin. I might not be the biggest SM fan but I know that the Hobgoblin IS NOT an Osborn. Just some other guy. Harry went on to be another Green Goblin.
A mistake I noticed, they said Harry as the Hobgoblin. I might not be the biggest SM fan but I know that the Hobgoblin IS NOT an Osborn. Just some other guy. Harry went on to be another Green Goblin.
#12
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Thread Starter
Originally posted by resinrats
Let's wait until we get a more reliable source than this. Considering how well the Spiderman films do, do you really think the studio won't want more. Normally it is the director not wanting to do more.
A mistake I noticed, they said Harry as the Hobgoblin. I might not be the biggest SM fan but I know that the Hobgoblin IS NOT an Osborn. Just some other guy. Harry went on to be another Green Goblin.
Let's wait until we get a more reliable source than this. Considering how well the Spiderman films do, do you really think the studio won't want more. Normally it is the director not wanting to do more.
A mistake I noticed, they said Harry as the Hobgoblin. I might not be the biggest SM fan but I know that the Hobgoblin IS NOT an Osborn. Just some other guy. Harry went on to be another Green Goblin.
As for the hobgobin, this is a very common mistake and I don't think it hurts the credibility of the info given about SM4.
#13
DVD Talk Godfather
Originally posted by devilshalo
So you'd be ok with spending $300M on the next installment? $400 on part 4, $500M on part 5?
So you'd be ok with spending $300M on the next installment? $400 on part 4, $500M on part 5?
Anyway, haven't we heard before that it was Raimi who didn't want to do anymore then 3? I find it hard to believe that its the studio wanting to slow things down.
#14
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by resinrats
A mistake I noticed, they said Harry as the Hobgoblin. I might not be the biggest SM fan but I know that the Hobgoblin IS NOT an Osborn. Just some other guy. Harry went on to be another Green Goblin.
A mistake I noticed, they said Harry as the Hobgoblin. I might not be the biggest SM fan but I know that the Hobgoblin IS NOT an Osborn. Just some other guy. Harry went on to be another Green Goblin.
#16
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Texas! Damn right.
Posts: 11,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by calhoun07
Or the Star Trek franchise....slowly going down hill.
I think they should leave it open ended. If the right director/script comes along, green light it. If not, don't do a fourth movie for the sake of doing a fourth movie.
Or the Star Trek franchise....slowly going down hill.
I think they should leave it open ended. If the right director/script comes along, green light it. If not, don't do a fourth movie for the sake of doing a fourth movie.
As for how much the films are costing, uh... how much do they bring in again?
#17
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell
Posts: 34,139
Received 741 Likes
on
543 Posts
Originally posted by Mutley Hyde
As for how much the films are costing, uh... how much do they bring in again?
As for how much the films are costing, uh... how much do they bring in again?
#18
DVD Talk Hero
I can't really see Sony/Columbia stopping the franchise until they start to see diminishing returns unless there's another reason.
How many movies did they license out from Marvel? If they only did three, which were hugely successful, then I can certainly see Marvel holding out for more money.
Also, if Sony is only allowed to make three movies, that wouldn't necessarily preclude Marvel from shopping the franchise around to other studios.
How many movies did they license out from Marvel? If they only did three, which were hugely successful, then I can certainly see Marvel holding out for more money.
Also, if Sony is only allowed to make three movies, that wouldn't necessarily preclude Marvel from shopping the franchise around to other studios.
#21
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Thread Starter
Originally posted by taa455
Hmmm....
"Spierman"? Never heard of it.
Sorry, couldn't resist.
Hmmm....
"Spierman"? Never heard of it.
Sorry, couldn't resist.
#22
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I hope they do leave it open ended. No matter how they wrap up the story arc, there's still going to be room to make more Spiderman movies. Cuase I doubt Pascal is asking Raimi to either kill or have Spiderman quit being Spiderman. What they'll do is wrap up the story arc they've created in 1 and 2, but since Spiderman is still around, his character can be taken to more sequels, which could probably at that point perhaps use a new director actor who knows. But it seems it's more about wrapping up this particular section of the series.
#23
Banned by request
Frankly, I would have no problem if they ended it with 3. Everyone here is presuming 3 will be as good or better than 2. We don't know if that's how it will be. And there are very few franchises that maintain quality past the third film. Unless they want to do Spider-Man like Zatoichi, where each successive film basically has nothing to do with the previous ones.
#25
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
As for the hobgobin, this is a very common mistake and I don't think it hurts the credibility of the info given about SM4.