Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Video Game Talk
Reload this Page >

XBOX 360 Backwards Compatability List revealed

Community
Search
Video Game Talk The Place to talk about and trade Video & PC Games

XBOX 360 Backwards Compatability List revealed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-06 | 12:11 PM
  #301  
Save Ferris's Avatar
2017 TOTY Winner
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Well, "Black" works on the 360 so thats saying something right?
Old 04-07-06 | 01:00 PM
  #302  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Decatur, IN
yeah that game was kinda cool
Old 04-07-06 | 02:00 PM
  #303  
sracer's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 15,380
Received 60 Likes on 38 Posts
From: Prescott Valley, AZ
Originally Posted by Save Ferris
Well, "Black" works on the 360 so thats saying something right?
Yeah, it's saying that if you have "Black" or want to play "Black" then you're okay... but if you want to play, say... "The Sims", then you are SOL.
Old 04-07-06 | 02:17 PM
  #304  
Save Ferris's Avatar
2017 TOTY Winner
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
well im glad to see new titles like black and battlefront 2

i might get them now
Old 04-07-06 | 02:31 PM
  #305  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think I've become more skeptical because of how few updates the BC list has had and it's difficult for me to believe they will put more effort in to making old titles BC rather than focusing on the future of the 360. Black is great, and runs well too, it all comes back to the quote above for me that they said EVERY title and it's just not going to happen.
Old 04-07-06 | 06:10 PM
  #306  
JM
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bravesmg
I think I've become more skeptical because of how few updates the BC list has had and it's difficult for me to believe they will put more effort in to making old titles BC rather than focusing on the future of the 360. Black is great, and runs well too, it all comes back to the quote above for me that they said EVERY title and it's just not going to happen.
I believe they said they are aiming to have every game. I do not believe they guaranteed it. Nevertheless, as I understand it, Microsoft has a small team dedicated to BC. Other teams are working on the rest of the 360's future. I suspect that the BC team will continue its task until it gets as close to 100% perfect emulation as possible. It may not be possible, but I think updates will continue for a while before they hit that wall.

BTW, I read that Microsoft pulled some of the Xbox programmers to work on the next version of Windows (Vista) as it needs some performance boosts. I would not be surprised if some of the BC guys were temporarily put on that since perfect emulation requires squeezing every last drop out of the hardware. Once Vista is released, perhaps BC updates will be more frequent. You have to realize that IF that is what happened (and I don't know, it is speculation) it is understandable. The Xbox division is currently a money loser for MS. Windows and Office are its bread and butter and, in a way, have subsidized the gaming division that delivered the Xbox and 360 to us!
Old 04-07-06 | 06:41 PM
  #307  
sracer's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 15,380
Received 60 Likes on 38 Posts
From: Prescott Valley, AZ
Originally Posted by JM
I believe they said they are aiming to have every game. I do not believe they guaranteed it. Nevertheless, as I understand it, Microsoft has a small team dedicated to BC. Other teams are working on the rest of the 360's future. I suspect that the BC team will continue its task until it gets as close to 100% perfect emulation as possible. It may not be possible, but I think updates will continue for a while before they hit that wall.
BC is critical now.... not a year from now. No one will care what titles are BC then. Backward Compatibility serves 2 purposes... first, it allows those with the original XBox to preserve their investment in games when moving to the 360. Second, it helps supplement the handful of 360-specific titles. But as time goes on, there will be more 360 titles and so less reason to seek out an XBox game. And those with XBoxes will grow tired of those old games and either trade them in, or sell them. No one will care or want BC a year from now.

Microsoft oversold and overhyped a few capabilities of the 360.... Backward Compatibility and Media playback via Windows Media Connect are two of them. Rather than address those issues more vigorously, they're moving forward with more Marketplace content. They've already got our money on the system, so there is no incentive to deliver on the missing pieces. They're focused on separating us from more of our money.
Old 04-07-06 | 07:09 PM
  #308  
JM
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sracer
BC is critical now.... not a year from now. No one will care what titles are BC then. Backward Compatibility serves 2 purposes... first, it allows those with the original XBox to preserve their investment in games when moving to the 360. Second, it helps supplement the handful of 360-specific titles. But as time goes on, there will be more 360 titles and so less reason to seek out an XBox game. And those with XBoxes will grow tired of those old games and either trade them in, or sell them. No one will care or want BC a year from now.
I have had a 360 since launch. I have used BC 0 times. There are plenty of quality Xbox 360 titles out there right now, more at this early stage than any other console in history. I did not expect BC, and it was a rather late addition to the feature list. Given the incredible difficulty adding it involves, we are lucky to have it at all.

MS is working on both BC and better media connectivity, but programming and testing such features takes time. I for one like what they are doing with the Marketplace. I have gotten FAR more use and enjoyment out of Marketplace via XBL Arcade and Demos than I ever would from BC and and media connectivity. Different strokes I guess.
Old 04-07-06 | 07:23 PM
  #309  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,453
Received 1,377 Likes on 943 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
Originally Posted by sracer
BC is critical now.... not a year from now. No one will care what titles are BC then. Backward Compatibility serves 2 purposes... first, it allows those with the original XBox to preserve their investment in games when moving to the 360. Second, it helps supplement the handful of 360-specific titles. But as time goes on, there will be more 360 titles and so less reason to seek out an XBox game. And those with XBoxes will grow tired of those old games and either trade them in, or sell them. No one will care or want BC a year from now.
Precisely. there will be plenty of 360 games a year from now to choose from and seeking out old games will fade out. BC is key NOW to bide your time between the lack of [quality] 360 releases.

There are only a few left I would like to play and they are smaller titles, so unlikely they will see support and by the time they do I will have likely moved on.
Old 04-07-06 | 08:21 PM
  #310  
JM
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
Precisely. there will be plenty of 360 games a year from now to choose from and seeking out old games will fade out. BC is key NOW to bide your time between the lack of [quality] 360 releases.

There are only a few left I would like to play and they are smaller titles, so unlikely they will see support and by the time they do I will have likely moved on.
There have been a lot of quality 360 releases in the past month, with more just around the corner.
Old 04-08-06 | 04:49 AM
  #311  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,426
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Indiana
Is there any reason why Prince of Persia: Sands of Time is BC but the other two PoP games are not? All three games use the same graphic engine, so I would think that if one works, they should all work.
Old 04-08-06 | 09:34 AM
  #312  
sracer's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 15,380
Received 60 Likes on 38 Posts
From: Prescott Valley, AZ
Originally Posted by JM
I have had a 360 since launch. I have used BC 0 times. There are plenty of quality Xbox 360 titles out there right now, more at this early stage than any other console in history. I did not expect BC, and it was a rather late addition to the feature list. Given the incredible difficulty adding it involves, we are lucky to have it at all.
I've had my 360 since launch as well. I have used BC for one title... Halo 2. (There's about 5 XBox games not on the BC list that I would like to play). BC was NOT a rather late addition to the feature list. The Actual list of BC titles was though. We are lucky?! It was Microsoft that promised BC. They promised eventual 100% BC. No one made them say it. They said it because it would help sell consoles.

I never owned an XBox. I fell for Microsoft's sales pitch of the 360 being a media hub... play next-gen games, play XBox games, video, music, photos, online marketplace, etc.

There are NOT "plenty" of quality 360-specific titles. There's probably 1/2 dozen that stand out.

Originally Posted by JM
MS is working on both BC and better media connectivity, but programming and testing such features takes time. I for one like what they are doing with the Marketplace. I have gotten FAR more use and enjoyment out of Marketplace via XBL Arcade and Demos than I ever would from BC and and media connectivity. Different strokes I guess.
I'm a software developer and I know what is required to design, code, and test. The complexity of the task does not excuse Microsoft from failing to deliver on what they promised. Microsoft still has refused to acknowledge the inability for the 360 to stream video via Windows Media Connect.

The Marketplace is for suckers. Why? Because the content you purchase is non-transferrable and non-refundable. What good is buying add-ons for PGR3 and Oblivion, if you can't transfer them when you get rid of the game? Downloadable content is nice, but shipping out a CDROM with what I paid for would be better.

Don't get me started on the Arcade titles...
Old 04-08-06 | 12:03 PM
  #313  
JM
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sracer
BC was NOT a rather late addition to the feature list.
As late as May 13, 2005, Microsoft still didn't know if the 360 would be BC. See http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/busine...boxback13.html . IIRC, they started assembling systems in late August for the November 2005 release. BC was indeed a late addition.

They promised eventual 100% BC. No one made them say it. They said it because it would help sell consoles.
I don't recall such a promise. I recall saying that was the ultimate goal. Please provide a source.

There are NOT "plenty" of quality 360-specific titles. There's probably 1/2 dozen that stand out.
You are apparently missing out. FNR3, CoD2, PDZ, Condemned, GRAW, PGR3, Oblivion, Far Cry Instincts Predator, Burnout Revenge, Kameo, DOA4, and Top Spin 2 are all quality titles. Yes, some of those were released on other consoles too, but it is not like they are direct ports with no improvements. For a console that is not even 6 months old yet, that is plenty.

I'm a software developer and I know what is required to design, code, and test. The complexity of the task does not excuse Microsoft from failing to deliver on what they promised. Microsoft still has refused to acknowledge the inability for the 360 to stream video via Windows Media Connect.
Again, please show me where they promised 100% BC. Prior to launch, Microsoft indicated that Windows MCE was required for streaming video. Vista will be able to stream video, and MS is looking at adding the feature to XP.

The Marketplace is for suckers. Why? Because the content you purchase is non-transferrable and non-refundable. What good is buying add-ons for PGR3 and Oblivion, if you can't transfer them when you get rid of the game? Downloadable content is nice, but shipping out a CDROM with what I paid for would be better.

Don't get me started on the Arcade titles...
If Marketplace content were transferable, piracy would be rampant. It is a necessary evil. I have seen some of your rants about Arcade games. You are in the minority. I have enjoyed them a lot. XBL Arcade is a great idea that allows smaller development houses to get into the console gaming world cheaply. MS has bigger plans for this from what I understand, so it will only get better.
Old 04-08-06 | 04:34 PM
  #314  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,453
Received 1,377 Likes on 943 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
Originally Posted by JM
You are apparently missing out. FNR3, CoD2, PDZ, Condemned, GRAW, PGR3, Oblivion, Far Cry Instincts Predator, Burnout Revenge, Kameo, DOA4, and Top Spin 2 are all quality titles.
Maybe if you like every genre, but to me I'm not into boxing, RPGs, Fighting games or stealth FPSs. Add to that PDZ was crap and shouldn't be mentioned among the quality titles. So I'm down to a half dozen games to play. I'm sure I'm not the only one that doesn't play every genre either. So I'd say the half dozen comment is accurate to the average gamer.
Old 04-08-06 | 04:36 PM
  #315  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd have to say, even half a dozen quality games six months away from launch is a pretty decent number. Unless, you don't remember other system launches.
Old 04-08-06 | 05:12 PM
  #316  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JM
You are apparently missing out. FNR3, CoD2, PDZ, Condemned, GRAW, PGR3, Oblivion, Far Cry Instincts Predator, Burnout Revenge, Kameo, DOA4, and Top Spin 2 are all quality titles. Yes, some of those were released on other consoles too, but it is not like they are direct ports with no improvements. For a console that is not even 6 months old yet, that is plenty.
FNR3 was really incredible when i played it on a 60+" LCD Screen for the first time. However, a couple matches later, and it felt like the first Fight Night i played on ps2. Graphics are amazing tho. PDZ, Condemned, GRAW, FCI and COD2 are all FPS games, which i cannot stand. So those are out for me. PGR3 i liked a lot, but not sure id spend 50 on it, 20 for sure. Burnout revenge is hardly an upgrade from the ps2 version IMO, so no way id be spending $$$ on that.

That leaves Kameo (which i felt was slow paced and not really too intresting for the 30 min i played it), Top Spin 2 (Sorry, but no game will touch Virtua Tennis, that is the ultimate!), and DOA4 (I really liked this one!). So yah, the 360 game library HARDLY caters to all types. Its game library resembles that of the old xbox, FPS games, Sports games and Racing games with the occasional fighting game.

That being said, once i see more then just SF2 up on the Xbox Live Arcade that fully supports online with no issues, i will buy a 360 just for those titles and maybe DOA4 as well (itll be cheaper used by then). You see, even with all the "standard" titles release, the Xbox Live Arcade opened up new doors for new types of xbox owners, such as myself. I hope to see MK1, MK2, and some awesome Neo Geo fighters all aval on XLA, i will own all of them immediately!
Old 04-08-06 | 05:41 PM
  #317  
sracer's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 15,380
Received 60 Likes on 38 Posts
From: Prescott Valley, AZ
Originally Posted by JM
You are apparently missing out. FNR3, CoD2, PDZ, Condemned, GRAW, PGR3, Oblivion, Far Cry Instincts Predator, Burnout Revenge, Kameo, DOA4, and Top Spin 2 are all quality titles. Yes, some of those were released on other consoles too, but it is not like they are direct ports with no improvements. For a console that is not even 6 months old yet, that is plenty.
PGR3, Condemned, Oblivion, Kameo, CoD2, and GRAW are the only "quality" titles even though I don't care for war games and RPGs.


Originally Posted by JM
Prior to launch, Microsoft indicated that Windows MCE was required for streaming video. Vista will be able to stream video, and MS is looking at adding the feature to XP.
Not True. Microsoft stated days before launch that streaming media (including video) would be accessible via Windows XP PCs running Windows Media Connect. There are still plenty of links to references on the XBox forums where Microsoft STILL claims that streaming video is capable with a Windows XP PC.

Originally Posted by JM
If Marketplace content were transferable, piracy would be rampant.
In your opinion. Microsoft never said that.

Originally Posted by JM
It is a necessary evil. I have seen some of your rants about Arcade games. You are in the minority. I have enjoyed them a lot. XBL Arcade is a great idea that allows smaller development houses to get into the console gaming world cheaply. MS has bigger plans for this from what I understand, so it will only get better.
Yeah, MS has bigger plans to separate suckers from their money. Bizarre Creations would rather produce a for-pay add-on for PGR3 than fix the bugs that currently exist. This epitomizes what the 360 and XBox Live is about... nickel and diming.

I know that I'm in the minority...and it is irrelevant. I don't want to change anyone's opinion on XBLM or XBLA. You think that spending $2.50 for horse armor in Oblivion is great, well, that's good for you. Me, I think it's stupid.
Old 04-08-06 | 07:47 PM
  #318  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: McKinney, TX
Originally Posted by sracer
PGR3, Condemned, Oblivion, Kameo, CoD2, and GRAW are the only "quality" titles even though I don't care for war games and RPGs.
Who put you in charge of naming the quality games?

Lot's of people enjoyed DOA 4, Burnout Revenge, and FN 3.

Originally Posted by sracer
Not True. Microsoft stated days before launch that streaming media (including video) would be accessible via Windows XP PCs running Windows Media Connect. There are still plenty of links to references on the XBox forums where Microsoft STILL claims that streaming video is capable with a Windows XP PC.


In your opinion. Microsoft never said that.
It was announced MONTHS ahead of time that MCE was required. I got a copy of MCE in September for that very reason and I sat on the idea for a while.

I don't remember seeing video streaming ever associated with media connect, can you post those links on the Xbox forums?

Originally Posted by sracer
Yeah, MS has bigger plans to separate suckers from their money. Bizarre Creations would rather produce a for-pay add-on for PGR3 than fix the bugs that currently exist. This epitomizes what the 360 and XBox Live is about... nickel and diming.

I know that I'm in the minority...and it is irrelevant. I don't want to change anyone's opinion on XBLM or XBLA. You think that spending $2.50 for horse armor in Oblivion is great, well, that's good for you. Me, I think it's stupid.
I'm not familiar with the PGR 3 situation because I don't play racing games. So I'll stay away from that one.

I agree that the horse armor for $2.50 was a major rip off, but it was Bethesda who set that price. They say that they were experimenting trying to figure out the market.

The next DLC for Oblivion contains quests, new areas, and new abilities for a cheaper price than the horse armor.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.