Play GUILD WARS for Free May 12-14
#26
Video Game Talk Reviewer
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Formerly known as "Vryce"/Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 13,856
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Pretty cool game. I jumped in and created a character last night.
I think I might create a new one, as the class I picked doesn't seem to be working out as well as I'd like. I picked a necromancer/elementalist. heh.
But it was a lot of fun. The graphics and sound were very impressive.
I had a lot of fun.
I had to pick a different name then I wanted, but created a character Canis Firebrand.
I think I might create a new one, as the class I picked doesn't seem to be working out as well as I'd like. I picked a necromancer/elementalist. heh.
But it was a lot of fun. The graphics and sound were very impressive.
I had a lot of fun.
I had to pick a different name then I wanted, but created a character Canis Firebrand.
#30
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Groucho
How so?
How so?
#31
Moderator
Thread Starter
(I haven't played WoW so I can't comment...but it's good to see a comparison of the two games)
I agree that the submenus were a bit awkward, but not I've seen a lot worse. Bear in mind that GW is still in Alpha, and that the UI is often one of the last things to be finished. Hopefully, Arena.net will allow some customization of the UI (and the HUD for that matter).
Crafting is not the focus of GW, so I agree that if it's something you like to do there's a lot better games for it.
The lack of variety in classes and races is probably the #1 criticism I've seen of Guild Wars. My guess is that they're holding out in the initial release in order to offer them up in the expansion packs.
But the real key seems to be skills. There's only a handful available right now, so it's hard to tell the difference, but depending on the skills one pursues there could be big differences among people who are in the same class. Note that this is all speculation based on what I've read...it hasn't been fully implemented in the E3 build.
I agree that the submenus were a bit awkward, but not I've seen a lot worse. Bear in mind that GW is still in Alpha, and that the UI is often one of the last things to be finished. Hopefully, Arena.net will allow some customization of the UI (and the HUD for that matter).
Crafting is not the focus of GW, so I agree that if it's something you like to do there's a lot better games for it.
The lack of variety in classes and races is probably the #1 criticism I've seen of Guild Wars. My guess is that they're holding out in the initial release in order to offer them up in the expansion packs.
But the real key seems to be skills. There's only a handful available right now, so it's hard to tell the difference, but depending on the skills one pursues there could be big differences among people who are in the same class. Note that this is all speculation based on what I've read...it hasn't been fully implemented in the E3 build.
#32
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New York, N.Y.
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think its fair to compare Wow to guild wars.
Wow is an mmorg, but GuildWars is not a true MMORG.
It is more in the line of diablo where u don't pay a monthly fee.
Wow is an mmorg, but GuildWars is not a true MMORG.
It is more in the line of diablo where u don't pay a monthly fee.
#33
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by timewaster
I don't think its fair to compare Wow to guild wars.
Wow is an mmorg, but GuildWars is not a true MMORG.
It is more in the line of diablo where u don't pay a monthly fee.
I don't think its fair to compare Wow to guild wars.
Wow is an mmorg, but GuildWars is not a true MMORG.
It is more in the line of diablo where u don't pay a monthly fee.