Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Video Game Talk
Reload this Page >

Behind Infinium Phantom Console

Community
Search
Video Game Talk The Place to talk about and trade Video & PC Games

Behind Infinium Phantom Console

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-22-04 | 02:25 PM
  #51  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by PinwiZ
This forum cracks me up sometimes with how people with absolutely no knowledge of something are able to judge it.
I guess being a system admin for a major corporation would give me no background on systems, etc? Nor would having a business degree qualify me to speak about business models

I don't disagree with the statement that the problem with PC games is the loading, patching, hardware config, etc.

But consoles address this situation at a lower price point and generally without a subscription required just to play (I realize some specific console games have subscriptions and that some PC games, like Everquest have been successful using a subscription model).

My point with this thing is that they are asking for a bigger initial investment than the consoles, as well as solely depending on a broadband connection for any ability to play games (XBL depends on broadband, but playing an X-Box game itself does not). These are risks, that a company without substantially deep pockets is probably unlikely to be able to deal with and overcome in a reasonable timeframe (i.e. to turn a profit before they run out of capital)

Also, they are probably taking a bigger hit on the initial sale of this thing than the current console makers are taking on selling the current gen of consoles; i.e. losing more money up front. If the phantom is cannibalized for parts or hacked in significant numbers and their revenue stream is affected by this, then it will most certainly cause the Phantom to be a failure. At that point they would have harmed their reputation severely with the early adopter crowd who bought the thing for legitimate use because most likely the content would not continue to be provided.

I don't see it as a viable business plan at this point, especially keeping in mind that a substantial userbase would probably be required to cover the cost of supplying the promised content.

Last edited by sniper308; 01-22-04 at 02:41 PM.
Old 01-22-04 | 02:28 PM
  #52  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 47,792
Received 2,293 Likes on 1,423 Posts
From: Rosemount, MN
Originally posted by PinwiZ
But some people on this board seem to be so fixed on the "anything different is bad" idea that unless it's just a PS2 with more memory, it seems like a stupid idea. The game industry has always thrived on innovation, not just renovation. For every few product ideas that fail, there's 1 that succeeds and takes the industry in a new direction. This may not neccessarily be one of the successes, but I'm willing to wait until it's released to find out.

It took me exactly .5 seconds of thought to see a lot of problems with this machine.

I can't believe that people are going to pay for games that they don't actually own.

Console owners and PC owners (you know, the people who would buy this thing) are used to buying games, bringing them home and putting them in the machine. I can't believe they would trust that they could pay for a game that they "own" but all it would take is the bankruptcy of the company and the closing of the servers to completely wipe out their game collection.

People can still play their Dreamcast games, even though it is a dead system. What happens if the Phantom dies?

Sorry, no, that is NOT going to fly.

Last edited by Draven; 01-22-04 at 02:31 PM.
Old 01-22-04 | 02:29 PM
  #53  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 18,386
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Banging your mother
Originally posted by PinwiZ
This forum cracks me up sometimes with how people with absolutely no knowledge of something are able to judge it.
Do you give all the spam you get the benefit of the doubt?
Old 01-22-04 | 11:29 PM
  #54  
Member
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lansing, MI USA
Almost all the regular contributors to the forum are very knowledgable about video games, and have been playing them for a long time. We've come to know what is likely to fail, what is likely to succeed, and what needs to be improved.
yes, I know this, which is why I come to the forum in the first place.

My point was not that people here aren't knowledgeable, but between this thread and the new Nintendo gizmo thread, there's just a lot of people making broad comments based on very limited information (more so in the Nintendo thread than this one).

I'm certainly not saying the Phantom is the greatest idea ever. But it's an interesting one. I think it will have a broad appeal to the average gamer.

I do however think that everyone should be excited to see this kind of innovation coming from various companies. It can only help the gaming industry as a whole, which in the end, is what we are all looking for I'd hope.
Old 02-26-04 | 08:25 PM
  #55  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: MD
lol, the drama that is the Phantom continues. I forgot about them actually but they keep trying to bring themselves back in the spotlight. Now they're trying to sue HardOCP.com for that article posted at the beginning of this thread, which has been there since September.

Attorneys for the company, which created the Phantom gaming console, and Infinium founder Tim Roberts are threatening to sue the video- game site HardOCP.com


You can read HardOCP's response here

http://www.hardocp.com/news.html?new...FyeSAsMjAwNA==

And if that wasn't funny enough, Infiniums owner Tim Roberts made a post a few days ago on Infiniums message board (which he now deleted) stating that the guys at Penny Arcade called him on the phone to tell him he was they were intentially joking with him with their recent comics, which it turns out (as you might have guessed) PA stated on the site that they never called them nor have any intention to ever do.

this guy at Infinium is so full of crap its amazing.
Old 02-26-04 | 09:17 PM
  #56  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 18,386
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Banging your mother
http://www.penny-arcade.com/images/2004/20040223l.jpg
Old 02-27-04 | 08:49 AM
  #57  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hilarious...
Old 03-04-04 | 10:31 AM
  #58  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 3,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Nestled amidst Angeleno faults.
Originally posted by Outlaw
lol, the drama that is the Phantom continues. I forgot about them actually but they keep trying to bring themselves back in the spotlight. Now they're trying to sue HardOCP.com for that article posted at the beginning of this thread, which has been there since September.



You can read HardOCP's response here

http://www.hardocp.com/news.html?new...FyeSAsMjAwNA==

And if that wasn't funny enough, Infiniums owner Tim Roberts made a post a few days ago on Infiniums message board (which he now deleted) stating that the guys at Penny Arcade called him on the phone to tell him he was they were intentially joking with him with their recent comics, which it turns out (as you might have guessed) PA stated on the site that they never called them nor have any intention to ever do.

this guy at Infinium is so full of crap its amazing. [/B]
HardOCP is now fighting back. They've filed a lawsuit against Infinium.

http://www.gamespot.com/news/2004/03...s_6090525.html

...On February 27, Bennett filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, "to clear the air and terminate the flurry of demands, allegations, and defamatory Internet posts directed against HardOCP.com, by Infinium Labs and law firms representing Infinium Labs and its CEO, Tim Roberts." Documents were served to Infinium Labs representatives in Florida yesterday.

In a press release soon to be made public, lawyers representing KB Networks (the Bennett-founded entity that owns HardOCP), refers to the suit as one based on a legal statue commonly referred to as the "Declaratory Judgment Act." HardOCP lawyers explain the act as one that "permits a person or entity being threatened with lawsuits from another party to force the issue to be decided, rather than having to operate under a cloud of uncertainty and intimidation." ...
Old 03-04-04 | 10:41 AM
  #59  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Blu-Ray: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Petition
I think everyone is pulling for HardOCP. Infinium should have just dropped this issue, but now it will cause them embarrasment when they lose this case in court.
Old 03-04-04 | 11:27 AM
  #60  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
haha, hardocp will own infinium.
Old 03-04-04 | 03:12 PM
  #61  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: MD
lol! They probably weren't expecting that. I hope they finally expose Infinium and Tim Robert's for the scam artist that he is. I liked PA's headline: "Stop pretending like you're a real company!"

edit:uhh...because people are being sued for so called alledged "defamatory comments," i need to point out that I didn't really mean what I said up above. Its uh, only what I heard, or something.

Last edited by Outlaw; 03-04-04 at 04:32 PM.
Old 03-04-04 | 07:13 PM
  #62  
Guest
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,484
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Glendale, next to L.A.

edit:uhh...because people are being sued for so called alledged "defamatory comments," i need to point out that I didn't really mean what I said up above. Its uh, only what I heard, or something.

Too late!

Chris
Old 12-16-08 | 10:42 AM
  #63  
Guest
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,484
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Glendale, next to L.A.
Holy Thr........

http://www.gamesindustry.biz/article...l-distribution

Phantom launches as digital distribution

James Lee
09:46 (BST) 16/12/2008

Phantom Entertainment, in partnership with GameStreamer, has launched its online game store, featuring a catalogue of over 2,600 PC titles.

The store allows for the outright purchasing of games, such as FarCry 2 or Fallout 3, or try before you buy, and uses a content licensing management system to track all games purchased, so the user owns the license forever and can freely return to re-download the game.

The Phantom was originally announced in 2003 as a disc-less PC to operate as a console by relying entirely on a broadband connection to download and play games, however, years later the PC-console failed to materialise.

The company has also announced the impending launch of its Phantom Lapboard, a keyboard and mouse peripheral designed to facilitate PC gaming while sitting on a couch, saying that the company now has a contact to mass manufacture the product.
Might as well put to a close, to this 5 year story!

Chris
Old 12-16-08 | 12:06 PM
  #64  
Raul3's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 10,706
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Picture a cup in the middle of the sea
They were too ahead of times.
Old 07-07-15 | 05:00 PM
  #65  
fumanstan's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 55,349
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
From: Irvine, CA
Re: Behind Infinium Phantom Console

A part of me really wanted to bump some of the even older threads about this

http://forum.dvdtalk.com/video-game-...hlight=phantom

http://forum.dvdtalk.com/video-game-...hlight=phantom

http://forum.dvdtalk.com/video-game-...hlight=phantom

Anyway, apparently someone found a functional prototype of the console.

http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2015/0...antom-console/

Old 07-08-15 | 10:48 AM
  #66  
chuckd21's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 10,708
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Florida
Re: Behind Infinium Phantom Console

So many guests and banned users up in here.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.